Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
    • Thanks for your interest dx100. Didn’t reach a hearing. Although they filed court papers, they withdrew a few days beforehand, and admitted it was statute barred and I have it in writing that they say the matter is now closed. Once again, many thanks for all your help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Adidas/DWF Claimform - Supposed Non-Return of Refunded Items.


Nongki

Recommended Posts

Just been directed to this forum as the result of receiving a claim form from Adidas via small claims court, looks like I am 1 of many

Unfortunately me being directed here may well be too late as I have already filed a defence, which seems to go against advice given

Any assistance would be massively appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum.

 

If you would read the following link and then complete and copy paste your responses back here so we have all the details of the claim. Some of the Q,s wont be applicable to your type of claim but just complete as N/A.

 

Also, a copy of your defence submitted would be helpful.

 

Andy

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which Court have you received the claim from ? 

County Court Business Centre, Northampton

Name of the Claimant ? Adidas

Date of issue –  24th January 2023

Particulars of Claim

What is the claim for – 

1. The claimant sold and delivered goods to the defendant.

2. The defendant subsequently invoked the claimants returns and withdrawal policy.

3. Whilst the claimant processed a refund to the defendant in the sum of £966.02, it discovered that the goods were never received back.

4. The claimant had, therefore, made the payment to the defendant as a result of a mistake.

5. It then demanded repayment of the said sum on 28/04/2023.

6. The defendant has failed to repay all or part of that sum.

7. In the premises, the claimant is entitled to repayment of the said sum

and, further claims interest pursuant to s.69 of the county courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% from the date the claimant demanded payment totalling £109.87 and continuing at a daily rate of £0.34

AND the claimant claims against the defendant.

1  The sum of £966.02

2  Damages in the alternative

3  Interest as foresaid

4  Costs

 

What is the total value of the claim? £ 1235.89
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? 2 letters and an email
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? no
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? no
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? after
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? online
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? no
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original - Adidas
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? n/a
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? n/a
 

Why did you cease payments? n/a
 

What was the date of your last payment? n/a
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? n/a
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? n/a

 

Defence

Firstly, I wish to state that I have received no correspondence whatsoever on this matter and I am deeply shocked and stressed to receive a court document in this way.

I have never been requested to repay any amount to Adidas, if I had done so I would have provided them with the information below which they can check on their own account.

On discussion with my bank and checking all my bank and card statements I have not received any such refund as described from Adidas.

On contacting Adidas for my membership details they sent me evidence of the following transactions on my account:

30th July 2021 I placed an order AUKxxxxx to the value of £441.80 for 11 items.

6 items were returned using Royal Mail label provided by Adidas with tracking DAxxxxx. 

5th August 2021 I received a refund of £190.70 on receipt of returned goods 

3 items were later returned using Royal Mail label provided by Adidas with Tracking DAxxxxx. 25th August 2021 I received a refund of £202.10 on receipt of returned goods

20th September 2021 I placed an order AUxxxxx to the value of £371.12 for 9 items, 7 items were returned using Royal Mail label provided by Adidas with tracking DAxxxxx. 24th September 2021 I received a refund of £335.37 on receipt of
returned goods

In summary, I placed 2 orders to the value of £812.92

Returned items on 3 occasions using Royal Mail labels provided by Adidas with tracking numbers above.

I received refunds on receipt of goods to the value of £728.17.

Therefore the information that is contained in this application is incorrect and I respectfully request copies of all details
submitted to the Court by the Solicitor in this claim and that this claim be rejected

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not how a defence goes sadly.

 

That's more like a witness statement better for that later 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all.... if 24th is the date top right on the Claimform you have 33 days as long as you have done AOS...

 

You've weeks to file a correct and CPR compliant defence we'll help as you are now not alone. 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops you say you uploaded that to mcol?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Adidas/DWF Claimform - Supposed Non-Return of Refunded Items.

surprised that fitted.

 

can you just pop up on mcol and show us the status of the claim page there please

omit the claim number 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Status Summary

 

Please read this page carefully. From here you can decide what action you wish to take next.

If you do nothing, judgment may be entered against you.

Claim Summary
Claimant
Adidas (uk) Limited
Claim Number
K
Defendant
Mr 
Amount Claimed
£1,075.89
Court Fee
£80.00
Solicitor Costs
£80.00
 
 
Total Amount
£1,235.89
Issue Date
24/01/2023
Claim History

A claim was issued against you on 24/01/2023

Your defence was submitted on 31/01/2023 at 09:37:32

Your defence was received on 31/01/2023 at 12:05:35



 

Available options

You have submitted a Defence or Part Admission. You can view, print and save your Defence or Part Admission.

Acknowledgment of Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't worry too much about your defence not conforming to our standard defence your claim is different to say a credit card or loan type of claim there really isn't a right or wrong response...you have put them to strict proof to disclose otherwise, you have proof of what was credited what was returned.

 

It's now for the claimant to prove otherwise and will be very difficult that goods were not returned more of a case of not received which will involve third parties which is not your problem.

 

Await allocation now if they wish to proceed and if so, we can sharpen your defence into an effective witness statement.

 

Andy.

 

 

.

 

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fine so now you are waiting for the claim to move to allocation to your local county court and will receive notice by way of the N149 a and submit a directions questionnaire...comeback when you get this form.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

DQ N180 will be mentioned on claim status when/if the court send them out.

if the claimant wants to move it forward

 

dx

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Nongki said:

Is there a timescale for receiving N149 ?

 

Depends if/when the claimant informs the court they wish to proceed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the claimant has 33 days in total to consider a defence and decide if they wish to move to allocation (submitting DQ,s)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No .....the last entry in the status would be Defence filed.

 

If they wish to proceed the last entry would be DQ sent to Claimant/Defendant date xxxxx

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi again

Just a question about when the 33 days would be taken from ?

Filed defence on 31st January so 33 days would have been 5th March

Received letter from court acknowledging defence on 3rd Feb, presuming Adidas got at same time 33 days would be tomorrow

Letter actually said they had 28 days which would have been 3rd March

 

Cheers

Edited by Nongki
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its 28 + 5 for service (33) same as for you to submit your defence. You submitted your defence early.

 

Date of issue –  24th January 2023 

Defence due =  25th Feb (Sat) 33 days + 33  = Wed 29th Mar

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...