Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All   After a bit of advice to see where I stand. Bought a car in Sept 2022 on pcp. Been told it had a big inspection and was good to go. Had many issues with it throughout the year including trims coming off the car and sunroof not closing.   While getting the sunroof repaired at month 12, in Sept 2023, the bodyshop guy said your cars been in a bad accident. Garage said it hasn't but offered to take the car back at half of what I paid for it as long as I buy a replacement from them before inspecting it (probably damage control) (car was £78k, said they'd offer £40k "trade in value" as if doing me a favour).   Ended up getting a forensic inspection done for £2400 in Dec 2023, confirmed car was in a bad smash (write off level but unrecorded on hpi) and potentially unsafe to drive - front end is slightly bent towards 1 side, what looks like a hairline crack on the chasis, overspray, bonner with patches of filler all over it, damaged rubbers etc   Raised complaint to finance company and few weeks ago to FOS... just wondering what people's experiences have been like going through the FOS, main thing that concerns me is that it was 12-13 months after I bought the car that I realised what caused these issues and raised the issue to the garage/ finance co but the damage/ misaligned panels are actually visible in the advert photos which I saved thankfully.    Dealership has had my car for 4 weeks to let a few bodyshops look at it (without giving me a courtesy car!!!) Not giving me any updates either because I went to the FOS about it and didnt want to speak to them over the phone anymore as opposed to emails. Note: hanging trim was reported within 3 months but due to part delays it didn't come until like July 2023, within 2 months the piece came off again, claimed under repairers warranty for another replacement 6 weeks ago and within 2 weeks this time the trim is coming off AGAIN (assuming it won't stay on due to the car being actually bent out of shape slightly)   Any idea if I have a good case or if there's anything else I can do?   Thanks
    • After the dealer failed to refund the money I checked the sort code and account number to reveal which bank received the money. It turned out to be HSBC BUSINESS DIRECT ONLINE. I called them and they confirmed the account name wasn’t Langley Cars though obviously didn’t tell me the correct account name. My bank contacted HSBC after I reported this to be fraud and they did in fact do a charge back but reversed the decision when the dealer sent a copy of the receipt he gave me for the deposit where it said it was non-refundable. I said that doesn’t mean anything when the car should never have been put on the forecourt when it was a death trap, and not fit for purpose.   The MOT revealed only a few of the faults which he agreed to correct in a week as I needed the car to travel out of London for work. He didn’t meet that deadline either because there were other more serious problems as identified by my independent car check. The same mechanic informed the dealer of these faults. The car wasn’t fixed by the agreed date due to the extensive repairs needed. So he was in breach of our contract on many levels.    I requested the bank find out the correct name of the account and they said the only information they had was like you said was the account number and sort code. I challenged the bank stating that whenever I create a new payee if the name doesn’t match the registered account name, it declines the creation of the proposed payee. So what happened in this instance?    I checked company’s house using the address from where the dealership is located and there was neither the two names, one was aa advertised in AUTOTRADER and the other on the courtyards entrance. I thought as I had made payment to the dealers ‘Trading as’ name that it would more than likely be enforceable than any other. Indeed the Bailiff was the one to call me and say that a variation of the warrant of control needed to be done before he could go and enforce the order. I cross-checked the address on Companies House website and got 3 different business names. Only one appears to be car related.  I am unsure as to what I can do within the variation of the warrant which the bailiff felt was appropriate. I will speak to him again Monday. 
    • Their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. iit was not posted until 13 days after the event for one thing meaning it would be deemed to arrive on the 15th day instead of the 14th day. Now though we cannot expect that your PCN also missed the deadline there were still two other things wrong with the wording of the PCN that if your PCN has the same wording as your friends means that your PCN would not be compliant either. Their PCN does not specify the period of parking as required n the Act. It does show the ANPR arrival and departure dates but as those times include driving from the entrance to finding a parking place then later driving from the parking place to the exit cannot be described as a parking period. I suspect that the " Important Note" on your form will also not comply though I cannot be sure until we see your actual PCN.The reason I can't confirm that is because they sent out the PCN too late they have said that they are pursuing your friend on the assumption that they were the driver as well as the keeper-something that Courts do not accept. But it does look as if your PCN is not compliant which means that the keeper cannot be held liable to pay the charge. Only the driver can be made to pay it. If you have not appealed and revealed who was driving, there is no way that  Excel know who was driving.  So just to be sure please send them an SAR . On another topic do you have any proof that you did not stay there for so long just to really spoil Excel's day.
    • As your first PCN was a Notice to Driver which would have been followed by a Notice to keeper over a month later [even though it may only state Parking Charge notice] it is even more necessary to send PE an SAR. If either document fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act  2012 Schedule 4 then both you and your father are in the clear. So you do not need to worry about is any paperwork from unregulated debt collectors and fifth rate solicitors. The only thing to look out for is a Letter of Claim and all you have to do is respond with a snotty letter back to them .  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest overdraft and account withdrawn


Owed man
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 317 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

I need some advise from anyone willing to offer and from a relatives experience and high recommendations I think I will certainly get this here 😀

 

Here goes,

 

I have had a current account with Natwest for 10years or more and when i got into financial difficulties I applied for an overdraft around 6 years ago.

 

I could not believe how easy it was and cut a long story short my debt problem continued to spiral, over a few months before i knew it i had continual overdraft increase requests accepted and i now had an overdraft £4000,

 

So for the last 6 years I have just been paying the interest fees on the account which has continually been overdrawn just to try and keep it from exceeding the limit and incurring charges which some months further down the line failed to do and paid the overdraft charges when i could.

 

Over the last 2 months Natwest have been contacting me to settle the overdraft in full which i have not been able to do then suddenly the account was closed and I can not get access with online banking and now they say i have to deal with a DCA  (Moroncroft debt collection) who are now sending me threatening letters.

 

I don't dispute the overdraft debt but i need advice how to go about settling the overdraft and have a few questions?

 

1, I assume that even if the account is in default and Moroncroft have been assigned the debt i should still communicate with Natwest

 

2, I would like to get this debt cleared but i assume there will be plenty of charges on the account and wonder if i can claim them back and would like to know how as I have been told that unfair bank charges can be claimed?

 

3, can i ask Natwest to adjust the account and remove all unfair charges and then have a final amended figure to settle the account and clear the debt

 

Any help will be very much appreciated.

 

Thanks owed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm putting a shout out to my site team colleague @dx100uk who is best placed to advise you on this.

When you applied for your overdraft and then during the overdraft increases, was your credit record with the credit agencies already blighted? Did you have other debts with other organisations?

Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100ukwill be along soon - I have to ask though. This wasnt your main account was it? 

 

Do you have another account where your income is paid into? If not - Open one with some one. If you do then this should be a bit easier to deal with. 

Banks are calling in a lot of Overdrafts and tightening their Lending Criteria. Its likely that they issued a 60 day notice to terminate the account and along with that the debt associated it with will need to be settled. 

 

Could try an Irresponsible Lending Claim. May work... But you may find difficulty in it succeeding.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sar 1st

get all the statements from day one.

 

Yes ignore moorcroft totally

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks fkofilee/ dx 

 

ok , Sar sent to NatWest first I will look up contacts details on the forum and get back here once I have received the statement details.

 

yes this was my main account but I swapped to a new account 3 years ago just in case one day they reduced the overdraft with my wages? Hence I have just been paying overdraft charges for a number of years!!

 

owed

Link to post
Share on other sites

a copy of your credit file would be a serious game changer if it showed late payments/defaults/lots of existing lending at that time.

 

i've recently succeeded for a neighbour in getting a 2016 £32k overdraft written off under an irresponsible lending complaint.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks fkofilee/ dx 

 

ok , Sar sent to NatWest first I will look up contacts details on the forum and get back here once I have received the statement details.

 

yes this was my main account but I swapped to a new account 3 years ago just in case one day they reduced the overdraft with my wages? Hence I have just been paying overdraft charges for a number of years!!

 

owed

 

Wow dx that would be a game changer?

 

I have used all my free credit file checks up so will have to sign up for 1. Will it give reference to what was happening in the years around the account agreeing the overdrafts? Should I upload a redacted credit file so you can have your thoughts on where it stood at the time ?

 

Owed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good job on the account changing, always better to have moved and be aware of what could happen. 

As for the CRA - No dont worry about the credit file entry. 

How many defaults did you have when you applied for an overdraft? 

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as they do.

 

an sar to natwest will not tell you where your debts were recorded......

 

you will need a copy of credit files at that time for any IRL complaint to ever succeed, 

that will not be in an sar to NW.......

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi everyone

Just had my statements back from Natwest which show constant money going in to cover the over draft charges on a regular monthly basis.

1, Have I got just cause to put in a claim regarding the charges?

2, I have signed up to equifax but i am unable to find out how i get information regarding if i had any defaults for other loans/payday loans at the time the overdraft was obtained which I assume will assist when submitting an irl?

 

Any guidance will be appreciated. 

 

owed

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 16/12/2022 at 13:47, fkofilee said:

Could try an Irresponsible Lending Claim. May work... But you may find difficulty in it succeeding.

this is what was pointed too earlier , from the sar it will be possible to workout when the OD was applied for and granted. that gives you the date you need credit file history for.

 

you indicate it was about 6yrs ago, so most other credit in existence at the time would have been probably defaulted already, if it was those are removed from a credit file when the default reaches it 6th birthday along with the data you need about it.

 

this is why regularly checking and retaining copies of a credit file is always a worthy move, even if you are not in trouble at that time.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant go back in time no.

cra files are today.. thats it/.

 

use the fos cisheet and their od int rate. (cell d15)

put in every penalty charge on its individual date

the sheet does the rest

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have already told you the spreadsheet to use.

 

you can only reclaim fixed sum penalty fees.

ie returned dd fee £25

letter charge £20

overlimit £25

etc etc

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi Everyone

 

I sent an IRL to Natwest with regards to the multiple overdraft increase acceptance and loan taken out on the current account and this is their redacted reply attached. 

I have now escalated this the FOS and awaiting a response!

 

I have highlighted in red some contradictory statements and also the fact they they say that it is my fault that I used the loan that was applied for whilst being £2600 overdrawn?

 

Any advice will be welcomed.

 

owed

 

IRL reply.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

the fos wont swallow all that baloney!!

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx do you think I have a case for IR?

is there anything I need to do or prepare whilst this sits to be processed. Do I inform Natwets that I have passed this on to FOS?

 

owed

Edited by Gracelands
Logged in on wife’s profile
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes a very good case 

thats a std response 

 

let the FOS do their bit.

it could be months if not a year wait mihd.

 

did you send EVERYTHING in/out to the FOS on say a penstick, or simply a letter?

 

it might have been better to have consulted us first if all you sent was some speculative letter.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry dx didn’t like to trouble anyone I log I don’t need to?

 

read a few threads at work and then went onto the FOS web site and filled their standard complaint form adding the Natwets response, not sent them anything yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

to stop unnecessary fos delays id send them a penstick with every doc or comms to date

you must have a ref no. from the fos already?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx, I received a reply to my complaint from fos on 26/04/23 with the standard email " we are very busy, because we are busy we will only get in touch with you if we can help you, if we can help you we will try to get in touch with you within 7 days but it may take longer"?

 

Unfortunately they have not provided a case number at the moment sorry!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...