Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not prosecuting in the public interest seems to be bandied about on forums frequented by students. I don't think I've ever seen a prosecution not go ahead because of that. You would have to define why it isn't in the public interest to prosecute someone who isn't paying their way and is costing other travellers more. I can't think of a reason. HB
    • we have known for a very very long time that 9/10 the OC never knows IRRWW are chasing debtors nor  in some cases even taking money from them that the OC never ever see!! IDRWW pockets it -  free money - lets all go on a staff holiday. there was an article some years back whereby that quoted some +£4M debtors had paid to IDRWW on UAE debts that when contacted the originating banks knew nothing about....😎  
    • let the ombudsman do their job. you'll win handsdown you dont obv owe OVO p'haps anything at all.  dont worry about Past Due credit or any other DCA ( THEY ARE NOT BAILIFFS!) as for you being added to the debt, thats quite OK, you were a resident adult and equally liable under law. once you start getting things moving via the  ombudsman dont forget to get your credit files cleansed of any negative data & seek compensation for distress etc, again the  ombudsman should sort both out for you. as you are now NOT a customer of OVO, there is very very little they can do to you now.  
    • A question - did you use the supermarket or the restaurant? I see the restrictions are different. Sign.pdf
    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 610 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I returned two pairs of shoes that I bought from Adidas over a year ago. One of the shoes was £250, the other was £180 (yes I know, I was young and wasting the money I was earning at my part time teenage job). I thought the shoes were too expensive for the poor quality that I received so I decided to return them.

I returned the £250 pair of shoes and it was perfectly fine, got refunded, no issues.

 

For the pair which cost £180, I thought I had returned it, but I had mistakenly sent the wrong parcel, thinking it was the shoes. Adidas therefore informed me that I had sent the wrong parcel and didn't refund me for it, which I had no issue with in the end, because it was my mistake. I missed the 14-day returns window for the shoe and decided to keep it.

 

Fast forward a year later, I have moved house and gone back to the old house to discover that DWF have been sending me letters for the last 8 weeks saying that I owe Adidas £430 (£250 + £180, I presume). They're saying that I have to pay or that they will take further action and all this stuff. Whats confusing me is that, one of the pairs of shoes, I was never even refunded for (as I said, I sent the wrong parcel), so why would I owe money to anybody? The £250 pair I sent back and was refunded for accordingly.

 

I have a few questions about this situation:

I presume everyone on here will tell me to ignore but I was slightly more worried because £430 is a lot more than the amounts I have seen on here, so I was wondering what I should do in this scenario for such a large amount? Can they take me to court?

 

Is it true that these kinds of things can eventually affect my credit rating? DWF have said on their letters that they can affect my credit score?

 

And lastly, if I do continue to ignore them as people frequently say, are they just going to send me letters forever and ever and ever?

 

Forgot to also mention that as I said I have moved house, so I don't actually see any of their letters. I only saw these as I had to collect my credit card which got sent to my old house. Do I need to get the mail forwarded to this house or do I continue to ignore it and leave the letters? I just don't want a bad credit score or to go to court for the love of God.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can never do court

can never effect credit file.... totally ignore.

 

id be more concerned you have moved and not updated all your creditors .

 

hope you did your car and driving licence too! 2 sep dvla things.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah haha I had to do my drivers license literally last week, had completely forgot.

Thanks DX,  that's great if they are powerless, but will they ever stop sending letters? I've gotten two just in the last month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

several other threads here too

they will give up 

just retail loss scammers, nothing ever goes back to the retailers anyway

straight in their pocket

straight down the pub!!

 

just like DCA's.

 

dont forget your cars v5c!! too

 

you MUST write to anyone one your credit file or banks etc, esp if you have debts that dont show that you might have last used/paid within say 7 yrs

esle you'll get backdoor CCJ's.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

in two minds on that

none of the retail loss lot have done court since the famous 2012 case

but i suppose it wont hurt for the sake of a 2nd class stamp to write informing them of now correct address

although as he has contact? with the old AD im sure they'll tell him if anything more arrives?

 

cant see this being a backdoor ccj candidate .

 

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...