Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you have historical meter readings from before the meters were changed? And more recent history showing consumption, in metered units not in £s,  since the change. One specific thing to check is gas. Check that the meter and the bill use the same units. If the meter is recording cu.m but they're billing as if it was counting 100 cu.ft, then your bill will be nearly three times too high.  Overall I'm guessing it's an Ovo screw up. It's significant that they didn't block the transfer, maybe they aren't so sure of their position.
    • Hmmm, interesting point. In my career, that I am retired from now, there were an immense amount of rules and regulations that one had to adhere to by law. The qualification process is rigorous with on going assessments throughout your career and re-certification every 12 months. If you were shown to be not competent in those rules and regulations you could not hold the position and the operational consequences of that could potentially be dire. In the same respect, perhaps a judge who is not conversant in the rules of POFA should not sit in on cases that requires proficiency in that area? I also bow to your considerable knowledge in this area, perhaps I shouldn't be commenting but by doing so I find it helps the learning process. Your last point has just reminded me of something that may help my case, thank you.
    • Just had an email re the my breache in agreement by her rep.   I asked you yesterday if they had asked about her name in the thread being removed.   The issue they have is the Elizabeth turner and genetic pups entry on google.   they knew I did not put it up and told them so in court.  I dnt know how to post on google.   I told them I cannot remove what I did not post.  when i come back here and saw her name gone from threads title, I presumed her reps sought it.   now I get an email saying her names still on google ur breaching the agreement as it’s still on google.  
    • Peter McCormack says "ambition is big" and Real Bedford's attendances are increasing with promotions.View the full article
    • How does one obtain the permit? The permit team number is only open between the hours of 9am to 3pm Mon - Fri. It says on the website, To obtain an additional 2 hours, the driver must pay a tariff of £3.00 + booking fees in person at our Security Hut, is that how you get the permit also, from the security hut? What a rigmaroll that would be but maybe just another step to take to try and catch people out?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Deprivation of liberties / removal of rights


maddyhind
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 626 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My mum had a stroke recently.

 

Initially it went undiagnosed and she received no treatment. That's another matter. 

 

 She was progressing quite well until she got covid in hospital. She has chronic asthma and was in isolation for ten days.

 

She fell when in a side room on her own and lay unattended.

 

I am her carer and she hasn't gone a single day without seeing me for years. Being isolated desperately ill and slightly confused she became despondent. 

 

Since she came out of isolation she has improved slowly. She is not mentally incapable and no one has suggested she is until today. 

 

 Without telling me or consulting me the hospital has taken out a deprivation of liberties order against her  This bypasses any protection she has under the mental capacity act.

 

She adamantly doesn't want to go into a care home but she cannot make decisions for herself. I can't make decisions for her. 

 

The house is in mums name so if, as a certain doctor wants she goes into a care home it will have to be sold. 

 

 All of this happened Friday evening and the best interests meeting for her discharge is at 9am on Monday morning so I can't get a solicitor, an advisor or contact citizens advice while they're closed at the weekend. 

 

 I have been lied to, blatantly to my face, my mum will be put into a care home which she won't survive and I will be made homeless all so that someone can get my mums money. 

 

I'm desperate.

 

Is there any one I can contact over the weekend who might be able to help? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BazzaS said:

Who are you saying benefits / "gets my Mum's money" ?

 

I suspect you don't have a "health and wellbeing" power of attorney?.

I don't have any power of attorney at all. My mum and I were naive

Link to post
Share on other sites

The link below will take you to the Government's page on how to challenge a Deprivation of Liberties (DoL) order:

WWW.GOV.UK

How to apply to the Court of Protection to challenge an order restricting someone's freedom or get a deprivation of liberty authorised.

From the speed this has been implemented I get the impression that this has been granted as an "Urgent" DoL Order. If so, it will have been authorised by the hospital and can last for no more than seven days. Standard DoL Orders must be authorised by (usually) the local authority and there is a clear process for them to do this and there are a number of criteria that must be met before an order should be granted. These include:

 

  • The person is suffering from a mental disorder.
  • The person lacks capacity to decide for themselves about the restrictions which are proposed so they can receive the necessary care and treatment.

 

Before granting an Urgent DoL order the hospital should have spoken to you (or another relevant person) to discuss the plan and determine if another method of treatment that does not entail deprivation of liberty is possible.

 

This article provides information about the protections that are in place to prevent unlawful or unnecessary DoL:

 

WWW.SCIE.ORG.UK

More information about Liberty Protection Safeguards, replacing DoLS for likely implementation in October 2020.
Edited by Man in the middle
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d asked above who are you saying benefits / “gets my Mum’s money”

 

This is relevant if (as it seems you might be suggesting) they aren’t acting in your Mum’s best interests.

 

Equally, you don’t want the scenario where they (even wrongly) consider that you aren’t acting in your Mum’s best interests, and are looking to keep the status quo so you can keep living in her house ……

 

You can also go down the route of seeing if it is likely her lack of capacity is temporary, (which it might be if due to an inter-current medical problem), or even depression!

You could ask if she has been assessed by an expert in psychiatry (/ old age psychiatry……)

Edited by BazzaS
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone. 

No one spoke to me at all about the dol. I'd never heard of one until I was told one had been made against mum. 

 My concern is one particular doctor is acting In bad faith. Also the timing, dol issued Friday evening, meeting at 9am Monday so everything is closed for the weekend and I can't get any advice. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again!

who benefits if you mum’s house gets sold?

(please answer : I’ve explained above why it is relevant, and so can’t fully advise if you are bringing it up but not explaining!)

 

why do you think that doctor is acting in bad faith?. That is quite a serious accusation (one that a doctor could be struck off for if they

 a) were not acting in a patient’s best interest, and

b) for their gain, or gain of another that they had a relationship with…..

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

BazzaS I'm unsure who benefits from getting my Mum's money, presumably the care home 

 

Mum has been in hospital for a few weeks. She had 2 strokes and caught covid in hospital. She has chronic asthma and is in her nineties. During her isolation she had a bad fall. 

 

Despite this every therapist, nurse and doctor said that she is making excellent progress. Until the particular doctor just said that treatment was pointless because of her age and hospital was "the worst place for her because of infection risk" but insisted she'd be better off in a care home than her own home.

 

I pointed out that care homes were the worst for infection but he keeps pushing the care home angle. In the 24 hours since that I was assured that mum's fear of a care home and desire to come home would be honoured. Then same doctor had a word and a dol was issued without being discussed with me.

 

There was a meeting about mum that was supposed to include me and the same doctor said that I'd agreed with him that mum is mentally incapable, which I categorically hadn't. 

I would love to know if Doctor has a link to a care home. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know who's going to be at this meeting on Monday? I haven't attended anything like that but I would hope that it's more than one person making the decision. Maybe there's a social worker involved or someone else from the medical team, or a psychiatrist?

 

When my mother was diagnosed with demential it was an NHS psychiatrist and my mother's mental health social worker referred her.

 

If the house has to be sold, I'd assume the money would go into your mother's account as she owns it. I don't see it being handed straight to the care home as an advance payment.

 

HB

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "whole team "will be there apparently. This includes a social worker who has never met mum or I, sneaky doctor and several therapists. Don't know who else. I am taking a friend but the social worker says that I can ask for an independent advocate, which the hospital pointedly didn't tell me. This is another reason why I get a bad vibe about the whole process. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are getting somewhat ahead of events.

 

If it is a doctor (i.e. the hospital) who has initiated the DoL order it is only valid for seven days. It is what is termed an "urgent" DoL order. A standard DoL order (which can last up to 12 months) can only be issued by a  Local Authority and that is what will be required if your mother is to be detained for longer. Securing a standard DoL order is a process which involves at least six assessments of the patients condition and the proposals planned to treat it. It includes a "Mental Health" Assessment and a "Best Interests" assessment. This also makes provision for, wherever possible, that someone to be appointed as the relevant person’s representative in an unpaid capacity (i.e. a family member or friend). This is something that should also have been discussed with you before an "urgent" DoL order was made.

 

Whether the doctor you mention has any non-medical reasons for seeking this order is difficult to say. But from your description it seems, on the face of it, that due process has not even been carried out properly before the "urgent" DoL order was made. You must keep on top of this. In particular, when you attend Monday's meeting, you must establish why it is considered necessary to detain your mother, what plans there are for her treatment that requires her detention and why that treatment cannot be sustained without her detention. You should also question why you were not consulted before the "urgent" DoL order was made. At worst, you must be prepared to challenge the  order (which will expire next Friday anyway) in the Court of Protection if necessary. You can do this if you think:

  • the order may not have been authorised properly
  • this action is not in the person’s best interests
  • the person has mental capacity to decide their own treatment

Deprivation of Liberty is not something even a court embarks on lightly without evidence of its necessity, its likely duration and the consideration of alternatives. The Supreme Court heard a case about DoL orders a few years ago and some harsh criticisms and recommendations for changes came from that. I don't know if your mother's doctor is aware of that.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with above. When a DoL was a put in place for my mother when she was a care home I was full involved in the meeting and there was an independent advocate from the local authority. And somebody there - the independent advocate I'd say - should have spoken to your mother beforehand about what she wants. These meetings have a tendency to discuss the person concerned as if their opinion didn't count. Challenge that.

 

A DoL doesn't allow anybody to sell your mother's house or take her money. DoL is nothing to do with financial powers.

 

A key thing to look out for here is whether your mother still has mental capacity as defined under the mental health act. Expert medical opinion on that, eg from a community psychiatric consultant, should be presented at Monday's meeting. If it isn't challenge immediately. Because without evidence of lack of mental capacity the Dol should not be granted. If your mother is judged still to have mental capacity no-one (generally speaking) can force her to go into a care home against her will.

 

I'd expect evidence of lack of mental capacity to come from a medical professional who was both senior (preferably Consultant-level) and qualified in this area of medicine, eg community or geriatric psychiatry. Ask exactly who has made the mental capacity assessment and their job title and specialism.

 

Also be aware that lacking mental capacity isn't a once-and-for-ever thing. Your mother could temporarily be lacking capacity because of the illness she's been through in hospital but be expected to regain capacity if she returned home. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ethel. I am aware that a dol doesn't let anyone sell the house directly but it does let them put mum in a care home which she will have to sell the house to pay for. 

 Mum struggles with words and memory but it's intermittent, minute by minute. The capacity act would have protected her but the dol feels to me like a deliberate attempt to bypass those protections. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to invaluable advice from forum members I feel much more confident going into the meeting. 

  I also intend to challenge the DoL. Does anyone know of a solicitor who does this kind of work. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One more point that I had forgotten to include. Mum has been in hospital for a few weeks but no one felt a DoL was necessary until I said that mum's wishes were not to go into a care home. Within an hour an urgent DoL was issued without any discussion with me. 

 Is it any wonder that I am concerned 

Link to post
Share on other sites

These are all legitimate questions for you to ask tomorrow. You're entitled to information.

 

Hopefully you can get to the bottom of what's happened and why procedures don't seem to have been followed.

 

I would wait to find a lawyer until after the meeting; as MitM says, this DoL order should only last for a week and after tomorrow you should have a much better idea of what's going on. One question I'm not sure about is whether you would be able to look after your mum at home if she doesn't go into a care home?

 

We don't recommend lawyers I'm afraid, it's against site rules. But the Law Society website lets you search for local people with the right specialisations on this page. I imagine it would come under Mental Capacity or failing that, Social welfare.

 

SOLICITORS.LAWSOCIETY.ORG.UK

Find A Solicitor is a free service from The Law Society for anyone looking for legal services in England and Wales that are regulated by the SRA

 

HB

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think I posted this before. Age UK have a very helpful factsheet on DoL. It includes the procedures to be followed and who should be involved, plus how to challenge one if need be.

 

It's a pdf and if you google Factsheet 62 Age UK, you should find it.

 

HB

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...