Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Nat West PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6302 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm in the process of trying to gather information from Nat West about how much I've had to pay in PPI payments over the past 4-5 years. I've had 4 sperate loans with them over this period all but one of which were paid early and I'm still paying for one. I was always told that I would have to have PPI in order to be accepted for the loans and so have clearly been mis-sold them. So I did a SAR requesting information about all loans and received a letter a month ago informing me that any info reuired to be provided under Section 7 of the Data Protection Act would be forwarded asap, but that they have no way of locating info for closed accounts without account numbers.

 

Anyway on Monday I received a copy of the agreement for my most recent loan which I'm still paying and that's it! Then yesterday I received 6 years worth of bank statements from my current acount which I already have and don't contain loan account numbers.

 

So does anyone have any suggestions o fthe next step to take. Shall I write another letter requesting copies of all loan contracts or perhaps phone to request these?

 

If it comes to it would I be able to file one court claim for the mis-selling of PPI on all my loans with Nat West or would I have to make seperate claims? :???:

 

Any advice would be gratefully appreciated. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Antony,

This is just some of my thoughts on your problem.., If your loans were all taken out at your local branch it may well be worth a visit to them, I know that with the TSB when they call up my account on their system it also brings up details of all loans with account numbers. It could be that Nat West have sussed out what you are planning an could be being awkward regarding closed accounts.

 

It may also be possible that if you were repaying the closed loans via direct debit they should also be able to trace the loan account numbers that these payments were being made against.

 

Lastly if your current loan was used partly to pay off an excisting loan, again they should easilly be able to find out the old loan agreement number for you.

 

I think the banks have now started to get wise to the fact that they are about to start receiving sackfulls of complaints regarding Mis Sold PPI.

 

Good Luck Antony

 

If you have any other Questions Just Shout..

 

Ian

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ian for your excellent advice. All I really need is the original loan agreements in order to work out how much I've paid in unnecessary PPI.

 

Is this something they should have provided as part of the Data Protection Act information I requested?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Antony,

It may be worth writing to them stating that they have failed to provide all data under your SAR eg Loan Agreements. It is worth a go anyway, either that or see if you can find someone helpful at your branch.

 

Ian

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I'm still struggling to get information because Nat West are dragging their heels. However I'v just had a thought which is: If Nat West settle for unfair bank charges on my current account sometime in the near future as a full and final settlement, will I still be able to file a seperate court claim for mis-sold PPI on Nat West loans? I guess it won't be a problem because presumably it's a different acccount, but just want to check anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think you would have any problem claiming for mis sold PPI even after claiming for unlawful bank charges. 2 seperate issues there.

 

Good Luck

 

Ian

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, i've finally cancelled my PPI and received a letter this morning to confirm that it's been cancelled. However my monthly payments have only been reduced by £50 per month and the monthly amount for PPI as stated on my loan agrrement was £65. Nat West have said that the PPI payments start at £65 but reduce over the period of the loan as there is less risk. Is this correct and can they do this. I'm getting so frustrated with them at the moment due to a number of issues. Anyway surely if i have an agrrement that states that PPI is £65 a month and I've now cancelled the PPI then my repayments should reduce by £65?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't work like that anthony- have a look at the T&C's and it will confirm that. The only way it would be if it was cancelled within the first 14 days of the PPI being taken out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Anthony,

Well if they have stated that the PPI premium reduces over the term of the loan, surely your payments should have dropped to £50.00.

 

But as Natty says above have a good read through the Terms and Conditions of the policy, and remember to read the tiny hidden small small print in these policies.

 

Ian

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Ive got similar problem, I sent a letter to Natwest asking for a full SAR but just got 6 years worth of bank statements!! the statements have got old loan account numbers but do not have the payments broken down making it hard for me to work out what was PPI and what was the actual loan, any help would be greatly apreciated

 

Juanito

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...