Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nationwide charges and lies


Christian
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6643 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I have been charged over £750 in penalty charges in the last 18 months and after reading about the legalities decided to take some action.

 

i spoke at length to the Nationwide and they promised to refund the charges, they have not done so. I wrote last week and threatened legal action (as they would not answer my letters).

 

The result is:

 

They have removed my overdraft facility

 

My cards have been cancelled

 

My flexaccount has been removed from the internet banking site

 

I am stuffed??

 

I am going to try to open a basic account with another bank (Abbey?) to pay my salary into and invite them to sue me for the blance on my account. Any ideas to help would be much appreciated. I did thankfully download all my statements for the period as a CSV file and have these in a spreadsheet.

 

They have given me derogetory credit rating with experian too. I am really annoyed!!!!!!

 

:evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum!

 

Sorry to hear about your experiences - did they give you any warning that they were going to close your account? From what you're saying it certainly doesn't sound like they tried to make it a condition of accepting the repayment. Have they actually made the repayment, or do they still owe you the charges on top of closing your account?

 

I would certainly write to Experian and get them to put a note against the entry stating your point of view; anyone noting the bad credit reference has to be told your side of it if you've requested that to be held against the reference, so it's certainly worth contacting them and asking them to put a note against it.

 

With regards to the Nationwide account, if they've agreed to repay the charges and those charges come to more than your overdraft, I'd write to them and say you've saved them the bother of writing the cheque by considering the overdraft repayed out of the money they owe you, and by the way can they send you the balance between your overdraft and what they owe you. If the overdraft is more than the amount they owe you, you could offer to settle the balance, setting out clearly that the amount you owe is the overdraft value MINUS the charges they've agreed to pay back. This removes their opportunity to accuse you of nonpayment.

 

Whatever you decide, let us know how it goes. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Christian

 

This is the usual kind of story but a bit more vicious than we normally hear.

 

Have they actually closed your account or just the Internet access?

 

If they have closed the account then of course they are probably relying on the usual contractual terms which aparently allows them to close your account at any time, at any time at their discretion.

 

I think that there are two issues.

 

The recovery of your £750 charges

and the reinstatement of your account to its original status.

 

The £750 shouldn't be a problem. If the money was charged by way of penalties then it is probably taken unlawfully in that the charges far outweigh the cost to the bank of your "transgressions"

 

You should wirte the then immediatly, explain to them that the charges are unlawful penalties and tell them that you will issue proceeding wihtin 14 days of they do not repay you in full.

Don't make this threat if you don't mean it.

Have look at http://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk to see how you go about it.

 

But also come back here if there is anything you are not certain about and you will get the advice and information you need.

***********************************************************

 

The reinstatement of your account is a little more difficult.

 

I suppose that we have to be quite open and frank to deal with these problems.

The bank retains a right to close your account at any time. in fact this is an unfair term under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. there is ahort anaysis at http://www.journalonline.co.uk/article/1001153.aspx

 

On the other hand, this may not be an arbitrary act by the Nationwide.

You have incurred a ot of penalties over the last 18 months and if the Bank can show that you have not been conducting your account correctly over a period of time, then they could argue that they had given you time and had acted as a last resort. You and I now that they are just retaliating but it it was the court believes that counts.

You might be better off leaving this one alone unless you can point to sime reasonable action by the bank. For instance if you can show that it was their charges which prevented you from sorting things out and in fact it was thier unlawful charges which kept you in difficulty and caused the incurrence of further penalties, then you probably have an argument.

 

*************************************************************

 

Finally, I'd like to say that it is clear in my mind at least that as the pressure builds up on the banks as more and more people start to take action, I expect that the banks wil start getting nastier.

I am sure that they will imagine that a big stick will be useful to keep everyone in place. (How can they be so wrong?)

Your kind of story will become more common.

My own bank has now threatened to close my account if I continue to threaten them. My reaction has been to go and open new accounts with three other banks so that I have chequebooks, internet and debit cards all ready before I start my latest process (it won't be my first).

 

My strong advice to anyone who is going to sue their bank is to get ready while you can. Open bank accounts so that it hurts as little as possible when your bank takes retaliatory action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, today the Nationwide rang me and as usual started off quite aggressive. Alleging fraud as I had issued cheques knowing I did not have the cash to cover them. I refuted this and said I was fed up, would open another account elsewhere and would not pay them anything. We all calmed down then and surprisingly they agreed as a goodwill gesture to pay £300 in charges back, put my account back to working, reinstated my oevrdraft and have reactivated my cards. I can if I wish still sue for the balance, have not signed any agreement re confidentiality and am a happy bunny.

 

I will be eating meat tonight not lentil stew!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations! This is the sort of story we hope will become more common in the coming months. It's a shame they didn't pay everything back, but even what they have paid is excellent, especially since they have also reinstated your account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Christian, see my post in "Me vs Nationwide", my experience is quite similar to yours.

 

Open a basic bank account with either HSBC or Cooperative, apparently they don'y levy charges on them. (and HSBC won't mind your Default)

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the bank promised to refund the charges and you agreed with them you have a legally binding contract :) contracts can be entered into by verbal agreement. any bank will quickly back track if they have made an agreement and then violated in this way fearful youll sue them for consequential losses too (which i would if i were you). its sad though to see a building society doing this, they are supposed to represent their members, afterall by banking with them you have a share in them dont you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quick question on this.

 

Could they in Theory close any other accounts you hold with the Building society? Say for instance you have a membership account with them I.E a Bonus Saver or an Mini Cash ISA?

 

You would lose membership priviledges the right to vote and any potential "Windfall" should they go down that route?? Would it be legal for them to close accounts that are in no way in dispute?

 

Mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 13 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/05/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6643 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...