Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Roosterrs V HSBC ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6213 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am claiming back 2 lots of charges, approx £2000 and £600 from HSBC.

Saturday is 14 days from 1st letters being delivered to the branch. Now preparing spreadsheets and letters to drop in on saturday morning if no reply before then for the "7 days before it goes to court letter".

Wife is a bit concerned as she works in the financial services industry and is worried we will end up in court. A bit concerned myself if we go to court, but gained some confidence last night after catching the end of the money programme.

Anyway "back to work".

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello

 

Just trying to work out the interest using the calculator. When do you put the date that the interest is charged up to? Is it when you send your fist letter, the LBA or the court action? Delivered my first letter on the 2nd December.

I also asked for the £100 they are going to take from my account on the 19th December as they had already told me they were going to take it. I am not asking for any interest on this.

 

Can anyone help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Roosterrs,

 

At LBA stage you just include your spreadsheet detailing the charges, and any overdraft interest on the charges, you are reclaiming.

 

when that expires, you are ready to start the court claim. that's when you add on the 8% county court interest. your spreadsheet calculates it from the date of each charge up to the date you issue the claim, and then on top you claim daily interest at 8% from date of issue until settlement or judgement. to calculate the daily interest figure you take the amount of your claim (not including the 8% interest) and multiply by 0.00022.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The wife delivered the 2 LBA's to our branch today after delivering the relim letters on the 2nd December. (Got a receipt for these from the bank).Wife also asked why they hadn't responded to our first letters. With the response she got, she then quoted the FSA regulations(thats the industry shes in) and that they should have responded within 5 days to notify us that they were looking into the claim. With the second response she then mentioned about reporting this to the FSA. When I came home at lunch there was a message on the answering machine from the bank saying that they had sent our letters to head office and were looking into each claim individually.

When preparing a court claim, what should I include in it. All my statements, why I think the charges are unfair(relating back to paperwork bundle on this website, my initial letters. I have printed all my statements off of the internet, will these be OK?

I just want to get everything prepared so I can respond with as little stress as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Booky has put together a basic bundle here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/33060-basic-court-bundle.html

but it is unlikely you will ever set foot on the court steps.

It is likely you will need to send a scedule of charges to Mr Langdale and friends and to DG when you hear from them, so you will need to print out a few copies of your spreadsheet.

 

Crusher :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

As I am nearing MCOL/court action stage soon, can I claim for my HSBC current and joint account on the same court action? This means only one court case charge. Also, if it does go to court there will only be one court case rather than two.

I seem to remember reading on here that you could.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. The banks are trying to change the name of the fees to try to say they are not penalties. This is nothing more than a (dishonest) attempt to cloak these charges.

Dont worry, we have this covered. They are penalty charges, you can still reclaim them.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received letters back from HSBC in response to our prelim letters. Letters are dated 2nd January and we will have a full response by 29th January 2007 from Mr Colin Langdale. I am going to give them until the 10th January as this is 14 working days since we delivered our LBA's to the bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just getting together all the paperwork an preparing for the MCOL on the 10th January. I am going to claim for both accounts on 1 claim. I am just wondering whether I have made a tiny mistake. I sent the first charges schedule with the prelim in a matrix style. Year across the top and months down the side with the amounts and totals at the bottom. I have classed a couple of missed DD's as refused cheques.

With the LBA I sent a simple excel sheet with the account no. at the top and 2 columns, Date and charge. I didn't put a note by the side of all the "Total charges", but did against all the unpaid cheques and direct debits.

What should I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't worry about it - if the amounts haven't changed and its just the descriptions you can make sure its all correct on the schedule you use to back up your court claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just starting to fill out the N1 claim form with help from the Bank templates library. Is the N1 claim form in the small claims pack out of date?

There is no where to add the court name unless its the "in the" box at the top right of the first page.

My wife says we should wait until the 29th Jan,(this is when HSBC said we would have a full response), so we can show that we have been fair. If they haven't replied by then, then we should submit a court claim.

Would this go against us in court??

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife says we should wait until the 29th Jan,(this is when HSBC said we would have a full response), so we can show that we have been fair. If they haven't replied by then, then we should submit a court claim.

Would this go against us in court??

Nope, stick to your times.

14 days 1st letter

14 days LBA

then court.

Dont forget... you are taking your bank to court, they have done wrong not you! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just filling in N1 form. Do these particulars of claim sound OK as I am claiming for 2 accounts:

 

1: The claimant has accounts XXXXXXX & XXXXXX with the defendant which were opened in 19XX & 19XX repectively.

2: During the period in which the accounts have been operating the defendant debited numerous charges to the account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the claimant. The claimant understands that the defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the claimant.****I am not asking for the interest on the charges*****

3: A list of the charges applied to each account are attached to these particulars of claim

4: The claimant contends that:

a: The charges debited to the accounts are punitive in tenure, are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the defendant, exceed any alleged actual loss to the defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the claimant, and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the defendant which exercises the contractual term in repect of such charges with a view to profit.

b: The contractual provision that permits the defendant to leby such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the unfair contract terms in consumer contracts regulations(1999), the unfair contract terms act 1977 and the common law

5: accordingly the claimant claims

a: the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of

account XXXXXXX £xxxx

account xxxxxxxxx £xxxx

b; court costs

c: interest pursuant to section 69 county courts act as set out on the attached list of charges or at such a rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

****This is the 8% interest*****

6: Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for a service, then they must be reasonable under S.15 of the supply of goods and services act (1982)

 

I believe that the contents of these particulars of claim are true.

 

****My understanding of the above is that the bank cannot gain a financial benefit from anyone going overdrawn, bouncing cheques etc. They can only claim back the costs that they incur for bouncing cheques dd's etc. As this is an automated process and can happen many times per day the cost to the bank is spread across all the defaults and will be small. The cost to the bank to send letters saying you are overdrawn is small, again being due to being an automated process. These charges are unenforcable due to the UCTCCR (1999) and the UCTA 1977 and common law, and the bank has said it will operate under the laws of england.*****

 

So when I have filled in the N1(or MCOL if it will fit) I copy the N1 form 3 times and also my schedule of charges(including dates and descriptions) with interest at 8%, and send it recorded delivery along with the court fee to my local county court.

 

Sorry if this seems a bit over the top but I am just making sure I do everything correctly.(Like the old saying "measure as many times as you like, but only cut once")

Link to post
Share on other sites

1: The claimant has accounts XXXXXXX & XXXXXX with the defendant which were opened in 19XX & 19XX respectively.

2: During the period in which the accounts have been operating the defendant debited numerous charges to the account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the claimant. The claimant understands that the defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the claimant.[****I am not asking for the interest on the charges*****]

3: A list of the charges applied to each account are attached to these particulars of claim

4: The claimant contends that:

a: The charges debited to the accounts are punitive in tenure, are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the defendant, exceed any alleged actual loss to the defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the claimant, and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the defendant which exercises the contractual term in repect of such charges with a view to profit.

b: The contractual provision that permits the defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of The Unfair [delete - contract] Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations(1999), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the common law

5: accordingly the claimant claims

a: the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of

account XXXXXXX £xxxx

account xxxxxxxxx £xxxx

b; court costs

c: interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act 1984, at the rate of 8% a year from [date] to [date] of £xx.xx, and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of xxp. [delete - as set out on the attached list of charges, or at such a rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

****This is the 8% interest*****]

6: Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for a service, then they must be reasonable under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act (1982)

 

I believe that the contents of these particulars of claim are true.

 

****My understanding of the above is that the bank cannot gain a financial benefit from anyone going overdrawn, bouncing cheques etc. They can only claim back the costs that they incur for bouncing cheques dd's etc. As this is an automated process and can happen many times per day the cost to the bank is spread across all the defaults and will be small. The cost to the bank to send letters saying you are overdrawn is small, again being due to being an automated process. These charges are unenforcable due to the UCTCCR (1999) and the UCTA 1977 and common law, and the bank has said it will operate under the laws of england.*****

 

So when I have filled in the N1(or MCOL if it will fit) I copy the N1 form 3 times and also my schedule of charges(including dates and descriptions) with interest at 8%, and send it recorded delivery along with the court fee to my local county court. yes

 

Sorry if this seems a bit over the top but I am just making sure I do everything correctly.(Like the old saying "measure as many times as you like, but only cut once")

see amendments in red

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help with that. With reference to 5c, should the accounts be separate for the interest amounts dating from the first charge date to the serving date(e.g today) then interest charged at £xx for the toal amount of both accounts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...