Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Financial advisor has so far only incurred me losses


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 707 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently engaged a financial advisor to consolidate my pensions and a cash isa, together worth perhaps £120k.

This was invested in January 2022 and has only dropped in value so far.

I have written to them several times but they say things like you need to hold your nerve, it will get better when the situation in Ukraine is resolved etc etc.

I understand all the rationale in that the pension funds would have fallen with my previous pension provider however, to place cash into a falling market is quite reckless.

From the first moment it has only fallen and I've lost approximately £15k since January 2022. I am 64 years of age so don't have a lot of time for this to pick up again and I'm not working, nor am I likely to be offered a job due to my age.

How long should I give it before taking action and what precise action can I take?

Is there any way of recouping my losses from him?

I understand I could take this to the Financial Ombudsman but what would they do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some funds have dropped in value due to Ukraine and other factors and as you say, advice is normally to hold your nerve rather than crystallise a loss because markets usually correct.

 

When you took out this pension, did you have a discussion with the advisor about when you thought you would need to start accessing the money? And did the advisor explain the investment strategy to you?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response. I told him I didn't need the money yet and hoped it would increase gradually for when I do need it, say in 10 years. He said in theory I could start drawing down around £10k per annum from the profits in the future. He was recommended to me via a friend who has been with him for around 20 years and said on average his profits, after all costs and taxes have been around 7% per annum. 

 

But since I'm £15k behind right from the start it seems pretty awful to me. How soon can I expect any upturn and if it just flatlines for say the next 2 or 3 years where do I stand?

Edited by kenwood
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

I see. The trouble is that you went in at a time when no one could predict the Ukraine situation, so a drop was possibly inevitable. With a 10-year run, any decent fund should show a good return like your friend's.

 

And depending on which funds the adviser recommended, he might have selected one or more that could be accessed early. That's why I asked if you had the investment strategy explained to you. You should have had a full written report explaining why it was the right investment for you.

 

But you're saying you don't have much time, are you saying you now think you might need money in less than 10 years?

 

HB

 

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I meant about timing is how long should I wait before starting a complaint procedure if things dont improve?

I do not need the money just yet.

The funds are on a known platform and I have full access. In theory I could sell up right now without his "permission".

Something they said is that all the funds have stated they are on target for their 5 year projections.

I did complete a questionnaire regarding my attitude to risk and it came out higher than anticipated and at any rate he has treated me as medium risk tolerance rather than low.

I'm considering dropping him to save the 1% annual fee, it just feels like good money after bad. If the funds are on track what would I need him for?

Would this be unwise?

I really feel it was quite sloppy to put cash into a falling market, he admitted he had known markets were dropping globally since November, he didn't tell me this before transferring my money

I kept asking him for log in details to the platform but he did not even acknowledge this request.

It was only when I contacted the platform and they helped me log on that I saw the drop started from the very first moment in January, before Ukraine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the adviser has put you into appropriate funds for your risk profile and timeline, I'm not sure you can hold him liable. If you were given bad advice, then that's different. It's almost impossible to choose a time to invest because you can't predict. It's very easy in hindsight.

 

This annual fee, is it all for the adviser or is some of it for the investment house? Unless the adviser charged you a fee, he would be entitled to some commission - did he receive any up front?

 

HB

 

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He isn't missing a trick. He has charged the fee upfront and is selling shares on a daily basis to ensure he is gets his 1% fee on an ongoing basis. I can't believe I have to endure these losses when clearly my money has been mismanaged. I dont agree with you - he could easily have told me to wait a couple of months till the markets settle but didnt.

 

I dont even know if my funds are low, medium or high risk. 

Edited by kenwood
Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont even know if my funds are low, medium or high risk. 
That doesn't say a lot for the investment report / reason why letter you should have had before you signed up.
I have asked before, did you have one and also what did it say about the charges upfront and per annum?
HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have a long "contract".

The fees are 3% upfront and 1% per annum. He offered an annual fee of 0.5% for doing nothing, and 1% for supposedly being on call and visiting me once per annum to discuss the investment.

However, I dont even trust his judgement anymore. I will read through it again at the weekend and see precisely how he has assessed my situation.

I do have the contract letter.

It is worded in a very sly way, he's very keen to charge for services but at the same time has worded everything to absolve responsibility.

It is geared towards 10 years.

I dont know what you want me to find in it as it is quite standard, writing everything we discussed on paper.

He even vaguely alludes to not picking the funds himself, but picking them via Defaqto Engage.

He has written a couple of paragraphs about ethical funds as if I had brought the topic up in the first place but I didn't so I suppose it is just a boilerplate contract. 

What is it that I am supposed to be looking for?

Edited by kenwood
Link to post
Share on other sites

What is it that I am supposed to be looking for?

 

Well this is your complaint, not mine but I'd say you need to see if the IFA carried out his work the way he is supposed to as laid down by the FCA and tailored the recommendations to your requirements. Did he ask what your aims and objectives were and did he explain in writing why his recommendations were suitable for you? And were these reflected in the report he did? It sounds as if you think he didn't understand your objectives but did you tell him that once you had read the report?

 

I'm not sure what you mean about the contract wording but I thought an IFA was meant to declare what the commission would be on your investment and what the charges were by the investment house.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we are talking about two different issues. I'm telling you I've made an immediate loss and you're telling me to look at the contract. Whatever he states on paper is meaningless if I have started out on an immediate loss, it's looking like there will be more loss to follow if the rumblings about a recession are correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that but I'm trying to find what grounds for complant you can use because I'm not sure if a drop in fund value in itself is grounds for the FOS. I read something yesterday from the FOS [can't find it at the moment, sadly] that said if someone is complaining about fund performance it can be a sign that they were given poor advice at outset so I think looking the process the IFA followed could show up something.

 

The process should be something like an initial meeting with you to understand what your investment objectives are, how long you want to invest for and what level of risk you're prepared to accept. Then there should be a written report that will include the IFA's understanding of all that, with their investment recommendations and the reasons for them. After that, there would be a second meeting with you to answer questions or for you to raise any errors they've made in their understanding of what you want.

 

How much of the initial loss is upfront charges made by the investment house which could include commission paid to the IFA?

 

I've never been to the FOS but I imagine they would look at the appropriateness of the investment itself - is it a SIPP? - and whether the investment funds you're in are right for your timeline and risk profile.

 

Was there an explanation that fund values can go down as well as up and why the funds were appropriate for your acceptance of risk?

 

If you want to complain, you will need to follow the complaints procedure of the firm the IFA is with. After two months, if you aren't happy with how they're trying to resolve your problem, you can involve the FOS.

 

HB

 

For info this is how Defaqto Engage works.

 

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the loss between January and now before or after fees have been deducted? You mentioned some fees upfront, which is what often happens, so you'd expect some reduction in faund value at the start because of that.

 

If they were investing in a fund for a long term 5 - 7 year period and it was only invested in January then you only have about 3 to 4 months investment returns to look at, which isn't very much, especially against the background of the Ukraine war and the impact that has had on the economy. I'd agree with honeybee that the advice is normally to hold your nerve rather than crystallise a loss because markets usually correct (but I am not an investment adviser and that is not financial advice).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your comments.

I may be naïve but the way I see it is this:

Lets say there is a car that can take 100 gallons of petrol and the owner wants to do a special journey and has just one opportunity to fill up. Lets say the person who filled the car was sloppy therefore 15% of the petrol was lost. This means the person will not be able to make the full journey he intended to.

That's the way I see it but I know plenty think in a different way. If I'm 15% down at the outset then surely this has already reduced the future potential by 15%? 

fees have been deducted but if you see a graph of the investments it has just gone down from the first moment, which brings me back to my initial question of

how responsible is it to place cash in a falling market, and the guy admitted knowing/noticing global markets had been falling since November.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I understand what date in January your fund was invested. Was it after 21st January when I understand there was a market correction please?

 

If it's possible, it might be helpful for us to see the graph you're talking about.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Financial advisor has so far only incurred me losses
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...