Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SKY cancelled contract dispute - won't send me the full recorded phone call


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 727 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Could someone advise me please.

 

My contract had finished early 2021. I'd called in December to cancel the services from Sky as I was moving to a new provider for all of my services due to Sky being so expensive.

 

The person promptly attempted to sell me further products which I refused.

 

I returned all of the Sky equipment including the modem, Q box, mini bank x, cables and controls.

 

I then found in February Sky set up a new direct debit removing £56
per month without my knowledge. 

 

I have requested a refund of all money removed from my account but they are refusing.

 

I set up a dispute through CEDR. SKY sent me the first recording from early December with a female attempting to sell me products.

 

I realised this was not the recording in question as I'd spoken to a male advisor closer to Christmas who also attempted to sell products but went on to advise me I'd have a final reduced bill the following month.

 

I requested this recording but was sent and edited version, six minutes short when compared to the entry on my phone bill.

 

When I'd requested the full recording on several occasions the person emailing from SKY said they'd listened to the recording, there was only the hold time not included.

 

I pointed out the recording sent for the call with the female member of staff included over five minutes hold time.

 

In the mean time,  the CEDR adjudicator has decided to reject my dispute.

 

How should I proceed for the full unedited recording please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Start off by sending an SAR.

In terms of the direct debit which was set up apparently without your knowledge, contact your bank and invoke the direct debit guarantee.

However be ready for retaliatory action from Sky once they realise that they aren't getting their money

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cancelling the direct debit is not at all the same as invoking the direct debit guarantee.

If the direct debit has been set up without your authority or if it has been wrongly applied then the bank is obliged to refund you all your money.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd sent the SARS through the complaint page, possibly I should follow this up by sending a hard copy?

 

I've received the following email. Bearing in mind, a hold time of 5 mins were included in the first irrelevant recording whereas 6 mins were edited out of the second and conversation of importance.

 

Thank you for your recent email regarding your Subject Access Request.

 

I would like to advise that we have issued the call recordings for 08th and 22nd December 2021 that you requested in line with the GDRP policy.

 

Regarding your request to receive the full unedited recording on 22nd December 2021, I must advise that you have been provided with your recording in its entirety. As previously advised only hold times were not provided. Therefore, no further action will be taken in this regard.

 

I would also like to advise that we have received your further call recording request and this will be provided to you on or around 17 May 2022.

 

For more information about your personal data and how it is handled by Sky (including the purposes of processing, the categories of personal data we process and the recipients or categories of recipients that we may disclose your data to), please visit our Privacy & Cookies Notice:

 

However, you have the right to make a complaint to the data protection supervisory authority. In the UK, this is the Information Commissioners Office. In the Republic of Ireland, this is the Data Protection Commission.

 

Please get back in touch if you require further assistance.

 

Kind regards,

 

Customer Data Request Team

Sky UK Limited

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Dear Sir/Mdm

You say that there is five minutes hold time as part of the recording and this has not been included.

I should tell you now that I have evidence to prove quite conclusively – to the information Commissioner if necessary – that six minutes is missing from the recording you have sent to me.

Clearly you have redacted the recording in order to exclude a portion of the conversation which is prejudicial to you.

The fact that you are withholding this data puts you in breach of the data protection act.

I'm giving you another opportunity to provide me with the whole recording – including all the hold time, failing which I shall make a complaint to the information Commissioner and also take action against you for breach of your statutory obligations under the data protection act.

Yours faithfully

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've received a response. It would seem they will not comply.

I am writing to you in relation to your recent communications, I am sorry that we have been unable to resolve this matter to your satisfaction.
 
May I advise that I have carried out a thorough investigation and listened to both call recordings. Regarding the call on 08 December 2021, I can confirm that there were no hold times on this call recording, therefore, this call was not redacted.
 
Regarding the call on 22 December 2021, I can only reiterate that the hold time was removed from this call as this was not data relating to yourself.
 
I am sorry if this is not the response you were hoping for, However, I do hope I have clarified matters.
 
In conclusion I am satisfied that we have carried out the appropriate actions and have taken the necessary steps to assist you with the matters you have raised.
 
In relation to this matter we will not enter into further communications as we are now at an impasse.
 
If you remain unhappy with our position, please visit the Information Commissioners Office website for further information on how to proceed with your complaint.
 
Kind regards,
 
Customer Data Request Team
Sky UK Limited
 
I have sent the following email having checked the first recording again.
 
Dear Sir/Madam,
 
You clearly have not listened to the call recording 8th of December. Your colleague advised at 7.07 minutes, she would put me on hold. The conversation did not resume until 12.35 minutes.
 
I'm giving you yet another opportunity to provide me with the whole recording from the 22nd of December – including all the hold time, failing which I shall make a complaint to the information Commissioner and also take action against you for breach of your statutory obligations under the data protection act.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...