Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
    • At a key lecture in the City of London, the shadow chancellor will also vow to reform the Treasury.View the full article
    • Despite controversy China's Temu is becoming a global online shopping force.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pre 2020 PayPal Debt and Moorcroft - scotland


Orange_panda
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 696 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My apologies if this is the wrong forum category. I read a few similar posts here, so I thought 'Online Stores' would be the appropriate section.

 

Earlier this year I accrued a negative PayPal balance after they took non-existent funds from my bank account, which also resulted in an overdraft with the bank. I was gambling, and I did not realise I had spent significantly more money than I had.

 

I acknowledge my mistake, and I have self-excluded from the casino, but at the same time I am appalled by the fact that PayPal is allowed to let customers gamble with money which they do not have (especially after the Gambling Commission ban on credit cards for gambling).

 

I have sorted out the overdraft with my bank, but my PayPal balance is currently negative (it is between -1k and -1.5k).

 

I received an email from Moorcroft, which reads as follows:

 

'We act on behalf of PAYPAL and would like to speak to you on a personal business matter. Please contact us on **** *** **** or via our website www.mdrl.co.uk as soon as possible. Calls to the above telephone number will be charged at standard rate.

 

If you would prefer that we call you back please email us at [email protected] with your contact number ensuring that your reference number is quoted.

Our opening hours are Monday to Thursday 7.15am to 9.00pm, Friday 7.15am to 7.00pm and Saturday 8.30am to 4.00pm.

 

We must stress that we are aware of the current position regarding the virus outbreak and the effect it is having on many people across the country. We would ask that you simply contact us so that we can discuss your circumstances and make sure that we deal with matters correctly.'

 

I am aware that there is a similar post from November 2020, but I am not certain whether anything has changed since then, so any input would be greatly appreciated.

 

My questions are the following:

 

1. I have not responded to any emails from PayPal/Moorcroft, and I do not intend to do so, as I do not feel morally compelled to pay them anything (the overdraft was more than enough!). It is obvious that Moorcroft have not purchased the debt (yet), but what are the chances of them doing so in the future?

 

2. If Moorcroft do purchase the debt, could they send me a letter of claim and try to take me to court?

 

From what I have read on this forum, it seems that this has never happened yet in the UK.

I should highlight that it is PayPal Direct Debit and not PayPal Credit that I am talking about, i.e. this type of debt does not appear on any credit reports and does not affect my credit score in any way. Is this correct?

 

3. I assume it is important to mention that I have been away from the UK for over a year, and whilst I do not have any material possessions in the country, I hold a few bank accounts.

 

What would happen in case Moorcroft decided to take me to court?

I am genuinely not going to be able to find out whether they have sent me a letter of claim, given that I no longer live at the address I used to live at (I was renting); the only way for them to contact me is via email.

 

Would they be able to obtain a judgment in default against me?

Could they somehow obtain a court order (a 'third party debt order'?) to take money from my other bank accounts, which I still use?

 

4. I am not certain when I will return to the UK.

Even if they did obtain a CCJ (in my case, a 'decree', as I used to live in Scotland) against me, in what ways could I be affected by that?

 

According to StepChange (https://www.stepchange.org/debt-info/can-i-write-off-debt/statute-barred-debt.aspx), if I do not return in the next 5 years (6 for England/Wales/Northern Ireland), the debt would become 'prescribed', i.e. non-existent (statute-barred in England/Wales/Northern Ireland).

 

Nevertheless, it is also mentioned that

'If the creditor has already started action to obtain a decree before the prescription period passed, the debt can’t become prescribed'.

Does that signify that if Moorcroft obtained or even merely 'started action to obtain' a decree against me, they would be able to legally force me to pay them back even after 5 years have passed?

 

As far as I know, if a decree/judgment is not enforced within said period of 5/6 years, a court's permission is required to enforce it (say, if I were to move back to the UK in 2030). Could this realistically happen, and would I have to pay anything (e.g. interest, court fees) on top of the amount I currently 'owe' to PayPal?

 

Thank you very much in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PayPal Debt with Moorcroft - scotland

god you are running away with a serving spoon there with all you've read and (mis) understood.

 

moorcroft don't buy debts. so can never do anything.

 

did you open your PP A/C before brexit?

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ive removed a link/text you posted

 

stay clear of sites like that 

they really have some weird ideas on debts and how to deal with things.

 

all designed to make them and their mates money and turn unsecured debts into secured ones 

 

moorcroft dont buy debts, and a quick check on the FCA website using their name reg no. shows they are not licenced too.

 

as this PP A/C was opened before brexit there is little anyone can do to you

OLd PP debts dont appear on credit files and PP dont do court.

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Pre 2020 PayPal Debt and Moorcroft - scotland

Thank you for the response!

 

Would you be able to tell me how I could verify whether a firm is licensed to buy debts? For instance, in Moorcroft's case, I went to register.fca.org.uk and searched for 'Moorcroft'. There were several results, but I believe the Reference Number of the one in question is 714738.

 

I looked at the 'What can this firm do in the UK?' section, but I am not sure what I am supposed to be searching for, could you help me? I would like to be able to do this myself in the future.

 

I understand that (at least in the UK) there have been no cases of PayPal taking people to court over debts of this nature (i.e. PayPal Direct Debit, pre-Brexit account, although the debt is recent).

 

However, assuming that Moorcroft are indeed not licensed to buy debts, could PayPal pass on the debt to another DCA that is licensed to do so (once Moorcroft realise I will not pay them anything voluntarily)? Has there ever been a case of a DCA (not necessarily Moorcroft) buying a PayPal debt and taking someone to court in the UK?

 

Thank you!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not for a pre brexit PP debt no

stop worrying.

 

a DCa is not a bailiff

and have

ZERO legal powers on any debt - no matter what it's type.

 

as long as you dont move without informing your debt owners in writing, thus preventing any backdoor CCJ's , you are quite safe.

 

dx

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you!

 

Could you confirm that I am understanding you correctly? PayPal have never taken legal action over that type of debt (in the UK), and there has not been even a single case of them selling that type of debt to anyone in the UK?

 

I no longer live in the UK, but I have not informed anyone, as I had no debts when I left, and I do not plan to contact PayPal/Moorcroft. If they did obtain a CCJ against me (which is extremely unlikely), would I be able to find out while abroad and set it aside upon my return to the country?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no original creditors ever take court action themselves, too much like potential bad publicity.

they sell debts on 

 

if you have no UK assets like property , even if this wasn't a PP debt , but say a card, not even a DCA would bother to do court, nothing to gain.

 

you really should be reading up here on paypal stuff

we are self help too.

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you!

 

Yes, I have gone through over 20 topics, but many of them were pre-Brexit, and my circumstances are slightly more specific - the alleged debt was accrued in Scotland in 2022, but I am abroad.

 

I have no assets in the UK, only a few other bank accounts, with funds in them. Am I right in assuming that it would be not extremely unlikely but literally impossible for PayPal/any DCA to have my accounts frozen or obtain funds from them (e.g. via a third party debt order)?

Edited by Orange_panda
missed a word
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are seriously over thinking this.

 

Forget about the debt...

 

Dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Dx!

 

To summarise for future readers:

 

1. This type of debt does not appear on credit reports and does not affect credit scores.

 

2. PayPal have never taken court action nor have they ever sold debts of this type in the UK.

 

3. All of the DCAs (including Moorcroft) merely act on behalf of PayPal and are, therefore, virtually powerless, as they would need to first purchase the debt in order to take one to court. Nevertheless, they never buy PayPal debts (see (2.)), so this cannot happen. 

 

4. PayPal and the DCAs should be ignored, unless one receives a letter of claim, which has not happened yet to date.

 

5. The 'debt' will become unenforceable in 6 (5 in Scotland) years, but this is mostly irrelevant due to (2.) and (3.).

 

6. Stop overthinking and focus on more important issues. 🙂

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. correct

2. to our knowledge

3, no all dca's are powerless they have no more rights than you or i ..

5. statute barred

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am fairly confident that if (2.) was not true, you would have heard of at least one or two cases of PayPal selling this type of debts or taking people to court during all these years on the forum.

 

It seems that this is one of the few debt-related instances where doing nothing is the best solution! 😀

 

Thank you!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

until brexit that was always the case where no 'credit' had been applied for via an agreement and not gotten from their UK creditor ...newday 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

worth monitoring.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to follow that topic, but this person is dealing with PayPal Credit, not PayPal Direct Debit (like I).

 

Is this the first known case of PayPal selling a debt in the UK in general? I thought that they never sold Direct Debit debts (like mine), but selling PayPal Credit debts was normal? Should I be concerned?

 

Thank you! 

Edited by Orange_panda
Link to post
Share on other sites

yours is not credit. simply a negative paypal balance

 

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...