Jump to content


Historical Charging Orders - How to proceed and effect.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 91 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am not sure if I should start a new thread or continue with this one. I am in the same position, I have about 5 charging orders dating back to 2003 to 2009 See below for details:

 

NOTE: Original filed.
7 (21.03.2003) REGISTERED CHARGE dated 3 March 2003 to secure the moneys
including the further advances therein mentioned.


8 (21.03.2003) Proprietor: THE MORTGAGE BUSINESS PLC (Co. Regn. No.
1997277) of Thistle House, City Road, Chester CH88 3AN.


9 (24.06.2004) REGISTERED CHARGE dated 7 June 2004.


10 (11.12.2007) Proprietor: BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC (Scot. Co. Regn. No.
SC327000) of Halifax Division, 1 Lovell Park Road, Leeds LS1 1NS.


11 (28.08.2008) UNILATERAL NOTICE in respect of an interim charging order
dated 31 July 2008 made in the xxx County Court under Claim Number
xxxxxx.

12 (27.08.2015) BENEFICIARY: Asset Link Capital (No.5) Limited (Co. Regn.
No. 07273996) of PO Box 107 Caerphilly CF83 9AD.


13 (15.01.2009) Equitable charge created by an interim charging order of
the xxxxx County Court dated 1 December 2008 in favour of Lloyds
TSB Bank PLC (Co. Regn. No. 2065) under Claim Number xxxxxxx.
NOTE: Copy filed.


14 (17.03.2009) Equitable charge created by a final charging order of the
xxxx County Court dated 13 February 2009 in favour of Lloyds TSB
Bank Plc.
NOTE: Copy filed.


15 (30.11.2009) UNILATERAL NOTICE in respect of an interim charging order
dated 12 November 2009 of the xxxxx County Court (Court reference
xxxxxx).
NOTE: Copy filed.


16 (30.11.2009) BENEFICIARY: Southern Pacific Mortgage Limited (Co. Regn.
No. 3266119), trading as London Mortgage Company, of PO Box 88,
Cheltenham GL50 3SH and care of Lightfoots LLP, 1-3 High Street, Thame,
Oxon OX9 2BX.


17 (30.09.2010) Equitable charge created by a final charging order of the
xxxxxxx County Court dated 22 June 2009 in favour of Lloyds TSB Bank
Plc (Court reference xxxxxx).

 

 

1.Two of the above occurred as a result of credit card debts.

 

2. Three more occurred as a result of three buy to let houses I had that lost value in the 2008 market crash. Three properties I had were repossessed, sold and the shortfall was now a debt which was added to where I live. 

 

The question is, how do I proceed, I have not made any contact with the parties and want as stated above to engage with them to see what sort of arrangement I can reach with them. 

 

Also, If I want to sell, can these charging orders be a hinderance for the sale to go through.

 

What are my options as am just not sure how to proceed.

 

There is no joint ownership, all is in my name, all this occurred before I got married, my wife is not happy about all this too.

 

Thanks 

 

:o :o :lol: :D :D

 

 

 

 

More Power to the PEOPEL!! LONG LIVE the CAG!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, sharemaster2 said:

I am not sure if I should start a new thread or continue with this one. I am in the same position,
 

 

 

Start a new one given this thread is pcladys....... :thumb:

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are the sole owner of the property and all the above are against that property in your name...

they will all need paying, before or at sale,

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...