Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
    • Hmm, that's strange how they got my email then.  I assume the below is ok to send to DCBL, Nicky?  Hello, I am writing regarding our ongoing dispute and the upcoming court claim reference xxxxxxxx. To ensure fairness and transparency in our communications leading up to the court hearing, I request that you use postal mail exclusively for all further correspondence related to this claim. Please refrain from sending any communication or documents via email. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. If you have any questions or need clarification, please feel free to contact me via postal mail at the address provided above. Yours sincerely, xxxx
    • In the SAR, I received the original application, lots of computer print outs, yearly statements from 2013 and the new emails regarding my complaint. They sent me a £50 cheque after I chased them for the SAR after the 30 days. They said they was waiting for me to respond to an email (which I never received) before sending the SAR
    • classic P2G. I'm sure dianne and Lesley will pop an email to you at some point.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sky Charging For Multiview For Four Years Without Service Being Used


Guest
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 744 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It has come to light, as I deal with my Mum's Sky TV and Broadband subscription.

 

No idea how this happened - she arranged it initially and probably didn't realise it was being added. Or they mis sold her the contract.

 

In any case I think it requires a special box to use - which she has never had - so they should have noticed this and stopped charging her surely..

 

She is waiting for a call back on Monday (to hopefully get the refund approved by a supervisor).

 

In the event they won't or only agree to refund some of the amount, I'm sure you guys know something about her consumer rights there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose that this is being paid by direct debit so I would start by invoking the direct debit guarantee and also sent an SAR to Sky.

Keep us updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks BF - see what they come back with on Monday first. Yes she pays by DD I think. Will keep you updated.

Edited by Guest
Link to post
Share on other sites

Record the call

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

Record the call

 

I'll suggest it, but honestly if I'm not there to set this up she won't be able to figure it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

With the Subject Access Request (SAR) always use this simple phrase 'ALL DATA' as that simple phrase means exactly that whether they have it in writing, email, recorded calls it means all data that they hold.

 

They then have 30 Calendar Days to respond but that time limit does not start until they have acknowledged the SAR request and also bear in mind they may ask for proof of Identity which they are allowed to do which can then delay the time limit until they have proof of identity. 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've offered her £400 for a refund - straight into her bank. But oh - wish I'd taken the call! They owe her about £600 and they tried to fob her off with £360 and she said "round it up to £400 and we'll call the matter settled" 🤦‍♂️

 

So yeah, she done herself out of £200 there and I suppose there's no way to go back on that now?

 

I might phone up myself?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

They wont discuss your Mums Account without her express permission so you would either need to be present with your mum contacting them then giving permission then you take over and explain the issue.

 

or

 

You get your Mum to do a letter giving you full consent to deal with her Sky Account on her behalf and for confirmation this has been registered on the Account. You Mum in the letter will have to give full Address and Account details with your Full contact details)

 

 

Insert Mums Full Name Here

 

Insert Mums Full Address Here

 

Insert date Here

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Reference: (Insert Sky Account Number)

 

PERMISSION TO ACT ON MY BEHALF

 

This is to confirm that I (insert Mums Full Name) of (insert Mums full Address) from the date of this letter give my full consent for the following person to Act on my Behalf in any and all dealings with my Sky Account until this is withdrawn by myself in writing.

 

Insert your full name here (not your mums)

 

Insert your full address here (not your mums)

 

insert your date of birth here (not your mums)

 

insert your home number here (not your mums)

 

insert mobile number here (not your mums)

 

insert relationship (i.e. son/daughter/carer etc.)

 

I require confirmation that the above has been registered on my account

 

Yours Sincerely

 

(mum signs here)

 

Mums Name typed here

 

 

 

This will give you access to deal with this further on your mums behalf to challenge this further re the £200 without you needing your mum to actually be present to give her consent as the above is registered on her account.

 

 

 

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had no problem dealing with them on the phone previously, sometimes when she is there or at my house - I explain the situation and give them the passwords and they have always been happy to discuss her account with me. No need for this letter - but I'll bear that in mind for future. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...