Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OPC ANPR PCN - overstay - St Johns Retail Park, Wolverhampton **CANCELLED BY CURRYS**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 706 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, first time poster.

 

As per the title, got a Private Parking Charge letter from OPC for a 21 minute overstay (2 hour limit) where the initial £50 charge is due tonight.  I intended to ignore this letter, but just wanted to make sure I’m doing the right thing.
 

there is no photographic evidence with the letter etc so just wanted to enquire with the more savvy people on here on the correct strategy? 
 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] 

(must be received within 14 days from the Incident)

 

Please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement 08/03/2022

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 17/03/2022
 

[scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide]

please do not put JPG Picture files into your post

 

3 Date received 18/03/2022
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Y
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? N
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N
 

7 Who is the parking company? Observices Parking Consultancy Ltd

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] St Johns Retail Park, Wolverhampton 
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

DVLA and IOC. Also listed on BPA website
 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scan what you got up to pdf as advised in that sticky please.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to OPC ANPR PCN - overstay - St Johns Retail Park, Wolverhampton

Thats ok

 

have a read of these

 

Clickme^^^

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Use the site at the end of the list in upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Invoice sent out too late to create keeper liability.

 

No photographic evidence.

 

OPC are a joke.

 

Ignore their tripe until/unless you get a Letter of Claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The PCN is not compliant for three reaso

 

1] the period of parking is missing. They do have an entry time and a leaving time but that is not a parking period since it has not taken into the finding a place to park and leaving the parking spot and reaching the exit gate.

 

2] they have not declared that they are the creditor which they must do.

 

3] In Schedule 4 s9 [f] part of it states "(if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) " whereas their PCN states "subject to the requirements of the Act " which does not quite mean the same thing and under s9 it should.

 

All that means to you is that OPS can only pursue you as the driver and they cannot transfer the liability to you the keeper it does mean that you cannot divulge who was driving. And that includes you writing to them and saying things like "I parked the car" thereby admitting that you were the driver. There are many people who are legally allowed to drive your car so them not knowing who the driver is makes it more difficult for them to make any charges stick since legally they cannot assume that the keeper and the driver are the same person.

 

On the question of parking periods under the new Act if where you parked had spaces for al least 500 vehicles and entitled to at least 30 minutes free parking you are allowed a minimum 10 minutes consideration period plus a further 10 minutes grace period.

Even if the car park has less than 500 spaces you still have a minimum of 15 minutes without taking into consideration in your case the period of looking for a space, then parking in it and then leaving the parking place and reaching the exit gate. Certainly if it was a busy time when you were there  an extra six minutes is quite easy to require that sort of time.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

Is it?

 

Dx

Wooops!  You're right dx.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. lookinforinfo's comments could come in handy later.

 

The only time you need to act is if or when you get a letter of claim or a court form. By all means come back here to check, rather than ignoring something that turns out to be important. There will probably be other letters and they can become increasingly scary-sounding in an effort to make you fold and pay up.

 

HB

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a number of things that the parking rogues have to get right with their PCNs in order to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act. You have to sympathise with the poor dears when it is so complicated that ten years after the Act came out they are still incapable of getting it right.

 

The question you have to ask is  can it really be that complicated or are they a bunch of ignorant numpties. Now that isn't a difficult question to answer.🙂

 

Your PCN is not compliant as they have made 3 mistakes that we know about already  so just relax- you are not dealing with any Einsteins with this lot. Just think of them as a bunch of brain dead twocks and you won't be far out.The only trouble with them is not only that they don't have a brain, they also have no heart so don't think that appealing to them will work no matter how strong your case is. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to all who have took the time to reply and give advice - very much appreciated. 
 

I will heed your advice and await the next letter that will no doubt be heading my way soon demanding that I haven’t paid the full £100 and the heavies are on the way 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just by way of update (forgot to do it until now)

 

A week before the deadline I visited St Johns retail park with the intention to speak to some of the store managers. 
 

First port of call was Next.  The manager wasn’t very forthcoming.  Just said OPC were very strict and she knew of customers being fined for overstaying by just a couple of mins.  Wouldn’t divulge the details park operators number etc so left with tail between my legs. 
 

Walked over to Curry’s and had much more success.  Spoke to the manager and produced by PCN.  Straightaway she said “I can get rid of that for you”. She got her work mobile and tapped out an email requesting that my PCN be cancelled.  She asked if I was browsing or if bought anything in store on the day and told me to be more careful in future.  
 

Have heard nothing more in relation to this since.  So this is definitely a tactic to consider if others are in the same position

 

thanks again for everyone’s help

Edited by PA5816
Spelling mistake
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to OPC ANPR PCN - overstay - St Johns Retail Park, Wolverhampton **CANCELLED BY CURRYS**

Well done on your victory!  👏

 

Make sure you keep any proof as the likes of OPC have been known to "forget" when told to cancel tickets.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...