Jump to content


MET Parking PCN - Southgate Park, Stansted CM24 1PY


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 102 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Sure this won't come as a surprise to you all, but another victim of the shody MET Parking Services and the ridiculous parking scenario at the Starbucks/McDonalds parking area near Stansted Airport.

Same story of parking in the car park, leaving the car to use facilities next door to each other.

 

Few weeks later, PCN shows up through the letter box. Details are below:

 

1. Date of the infringement

26th February 2022

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]

16th March 2022 - See redacted copy attached.

 

3 Date received

Can't exactly remember but probably the 17th or 18th March

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]

Doesnt seem to

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

Yes, images of vehicle arriving and leaving as well as occupants walking to/from vehicle.

 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]

No appeal. Reluctant to do so.

 

7 Who is the parking company?

MET Parking Services

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

Southgate Park, Stansted CM24 1PY

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

Reference to POPLA and BPA Logo at bottom of letter.

 

No other correspondence has been received as of yet. My initial thinking is that this is over the 14 days period, so I simply sit back and do nothing.

Just looking for a little reassurance essentially.

 

Thanks,

PCN - 26.02.2022.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

No one not even a judge can charge anyone for leaving a car in a carpark, it's called reverse trespass.

 

Totally ignore them until/unless you ever get a letter of claim.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fleecers clutching at straws  again, they would try Reverse Trespass whether you bought stuff on the site before leaving or even when you came back.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...