Jump to content


Lowell Backdoor CCJ for old Sky Debt..***Claim Discontinued***


Cosmicdancer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 427 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They must consider there is enough information within your application and therefore not ordered any further disclosures/evidence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hearing is to consider whether you have valid grounds to set a side ..they will take into consideration what you have stated in your application therefore  it may be your only opportunity to present any evidence. So bearing that in mind if this piece of evidence is vital to the success of the application it may be prudent to forward a copy to the court in advance and ask that it be placed with your existing notes within your N244.

 

If the set a side is successful then you can present a further statement with evidence later in the process. 

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The piece of information ( the cancellation ) is the main grounds for my defence so yes it is vital .

 

With your advice taken into consideration i will get this into them ASAP.

 

As far as further evidence goes , I’ve only got a phone call recording from sky when the advisor told me that someone had claimed all the money back for the subscription and someone had tried to change the name etc on the account after I had cancelled it.

 

Surely any judge will see that the continuing of the account after I had cancelled it is reasonable grounds to prove I didn’t know anything about any activity on the account after I requested the cancellation ? Thanks! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just bear in mind this first hurdle is to see if you have legal grounds to set a side and you can prove that you were not given opportunity to respond to the claim......if you can do that and be successful then the full semantics of the dispute can be argued.

 

Don't forget that Loweel do not have any knowledge of the disputed debt and cant really dispute what you state is true or not...to them its just a balance on a statement they bought for peanuts and acquired a default judgment without your knowledge.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right.. so as you mentioned in a previous post they haven’t asked for any further evidence in regards to the first hearing .. so am I being naieve to assume they will believe I wasn’t at the address? I don’t know how I can go and prove I was living in a tent from 14th July last year 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sure a judge will accept your word that you were no longer in residence....they cant prove you were either.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

 So bearing that in mind if this piece of evidence is vital to the success of the application it may be prudent to forward a copy to the court in advance and ask that it be placed with your existing notes within your N244.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Today I received a “claims bundle” from overdales solicitors aka Lowell .. I believe they are acting on behalf of lowell.. they haven’t spelled my surname correctly on the exhibit forms there is a lot of paperwork to go through. Is this to put me off fighting it? Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they are as debt buyer don't goto court themselves they appoint solicitors, and overdales are part of the lowell group.

 

spelt not spelled....

 

scan everything up to one mass PDF please.

 

but no its not to put you off, it's what they have to do, as you did in your submission.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi please find attached the witness statement from over dales.
 

There is more “Exhibits” from them in the same pack that contain the generic harassment debt collecting letters they like to send.

 

With a variety of addresses.

 

If they are relevant I’m happy to upload them too.

 

Thanks! 

 

 

 


 

It was just to apologise for the engine oil , power steering fluid and coffee cup “ring” on the first sheet.

 

I hope it hasn’t affected the clarity of the contents. Thanks. 

Claimants statement Re N244 application.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to remove all ref numbers etc

leave nothing they can use to ID you here.

 

all todays posts merged.

 

post hidden to hide pdf

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as long as you now have the evidence you did cancel you should have no trouble here

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff. The PDF file I have with a 2016 cancellation date has been sent to the court and confirmed as being added to my case file. Is there any other angles they might want to try and throw at me I should be wary of and be prepared for? Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

have we seen this evidence?

 

the other bit you might wish to make notes on is why the DD never got cancelled after sky closed the A/C. but continued to take payments, but these were latterly reclaimed under the DD guarantee scheme through your bank. you just might need to explain that bit so make some notes. 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope I haven’t posted it yet I need to edit the personal details from it so I can upload it.

 

I didn’t do the charge back or anything like that.

 

It’s my ex partner that has done this to me. We used sky in my name because she’s black listed from everywhere. 

Thank you for your reply . It’s a very good and important point I need to bring up. 

 

40 - 19.09.2016.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

After being passed pillar to post from sky to Lowell to a company called overdales ? I now have a unique case number from sky and they are processing the SAR request for me.

 

 I’ve managed to find out that my ex was paying the sky bill up until late 2017 and then decided to claim all of the money back from direct debits through the bank . Leaving me liable for this debt..

 

I’m hoping to get my set aside form filled in today .

 

If I pay the money to get it set aside can I claim this money back from the company prosecuting?

 

Thanks!

 

is there a date on that sky cancellation notification?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

and..

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes because its come from the original creditor.

they can't now dispute your cancellation, sky have acknowledged their contract with you was closed, thus you ceased payments.

 

the fact that a third party paid sky upon a closed A/C, (and latterly reversed these payments) is a fault of sky for not creating a new contract in their new customers name. this again proves you owed nothing and were never an on going customer. You are thus are the wrong defendant, not the claimants correct target. 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...