Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you link us to BankFodder's post please? The judge's office means something different to me. HB
    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

BIG AGRO with HALIFAX LEGAL ** WON**


TUTTSI
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6061 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just to up date you all I have today issued a LBA againt the Halifax giving them 21 days to respond on behalf of my husband for £715 charges and Interest £499.79 total £1214.79. This account has been paid in full last year so I hope that they will still pay up. If not a MCOL will be issued.

I will keep you all informed of my progress.

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Will be interested to see your progress. I filed Prelim letter today for £775 & default removed also v Halifax card services. ant claim the interest though until I issue which is diaried for 18th December. Do you know if others have recovered v Halifax Card services?

HSBC 1st preliminary letter £3692 10.10.06 LBA sent 24.10.06

HSBC 1st Preliminary Letter £3280 10.10.06 LBA sent 24.10.06

Capital 1 SADR 11.10.006

Halifax Visa SADR 11.10.06

CITI SADR 12.10.06

HSBC Gold card SADR 23.10.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jaynekul

I will let you know the outcome in due course.

I have sent the LBA without doing the prelim letter and have added my interest which they charged on the card statement. The 8% interest I will add to the MCOL should they not cough up, I have given them 21 days to respond that takes them to the 10th December 2006. This is a closed and paid up account so any money returned is a bonus. Having read other sites some people have done it that way and have been quite sucessful.

Anyway I am sure the way you are doing it will also work and I wish you lots of luck and hope that they respond to you quickly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont expect any response until MCOL, my account is also fully paid up. Notice that the charges were £25! How can they possibly justify that?

HSBC 1st preliminary letter £3692 10.10.06 LBA sent 24.10.06

HSBC 1st Preliminary Letter £3280 10.10.06 LBA sent 24.10.06

Capital 1 SADR 11.10.006

Halifax Visa SADR 11.10.06

CITI SADR 12.10.06

HSBC Gold card SADR 23.10.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received the usual standard letter from Halifax today, basically saying that the charges were agreed to at the time of the agreement.

Have written back telling them in no uncertain terms that if the money is not paid in full by 10th December(which was the original deadline) then court proceedings will commence.

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I havent had a response yet. I expect the same as you. Will post when recd

HSBC 1st preliminary letter £3692 10.10.06 LBA sent 24.10.06

HSBC 1st Preliminary Letter £3280 10.10.06 LBA sent 24.10.06

Capital 1 SADR 11.10.006

Halifax Visa SADR 11.10.06

CITI SADR 12.10.06

HSBC Gold card SADR 23.10.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

After issueing a LBA ON 19/11/2006 the Halifax Card Services have answered that they are prepared to offer £300 IN FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT, figure actually claiming in total £1217.75. The bigger laugh is that the acceptance form states that the money can only be paid into a Halifax Account. Strange that the account has been closed and paid off for some time now so where are they going to pay it to. So that is a definate NO NO.

The LBA will be issued in the next few days.... so the fight is on.

HALIFAX CARD SERVICES CHARGES £715

Interest, Contractual rate £502.75

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I've just started with Halifax Card Services.

 

Will be monitoring your claim as i'm just behind you.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Just to let you know MCOL has been issued today agains Halifax Card Services for Charges £715.00 plus Interest £509.04 Total £1224.04 plus Court Fees £120.00 Final Total £1344.04

 

 

HALIFAX - Kofi from Halifax legal services have telephoned to try and come to a settlement and did not want to pay 18.9% interest and only wanted to pay 8%. This was the final day that the defence had to be in by. After a lot of toing and frowing they agreed that as the account was closed and fully paid up they could not pay it in to that account, my hubby suggested that they TT the money straight into his current bank account, no they said too expensive, the second suggestion was to send a draft, no they could not do that either, finally, he found that my husband had a card cash account with them which he does not use and they said they could put the money into that account and that tomorrow being Friday he could go to the branch to draw it out. He asked for this in writing - how difficult is this with the agreement that he could draw it out all in one go as it was over the daily limit, they were unwilling to put anything in writing. So tomorrow he will check to see if the money is in that account. If it is not my husbands account tomorrow he will not be very happy as they promised over the telephone, albeit they did not put it in writing. Has anyone else experienced this with Halifax

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

HALIFAX HAVE BECOME A TOTAL NIGHTMARE, NO MONEY TRANSFERRED INTO MY HUBBY'S ACCOUNT TODAY AS THEY HAD PROMISED YESTERDAY, THEY RENAGED ON THE GOOD WILL GESTURE AGREED YESTERDAY ON THE TELEPHONE. THEY ARE NOW COMING UP WITH ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE BEEN SETTLED WHERE HE HAS A LETTER IN WRITING STATING JUST THAT, THEY ARE NOW SAYING THAT THEY WERE NOT SETTLED. THEY ARE TRYING EVERY WHICH WAY NOT TO PAY. IT IS A DISGRACE, THEY ARE BEHAVING LIKE IDIOTS. MY HUBBY HAS HAD A BASINFULL WITH THEM TODAY. THEY ARE STARTING TO REALLY GET TO HIM AND ARE WASTING HIS TIME. HE OFFERED TO FAX THE LETTER TO THEM AND HALIFAX LEGAL DEPARTMENT DID NOT WANT IT! (WHY NOT ONE MUST ASK). EVENTUALLY JUST 5 MINUTES AGO THEY AGREED HE COULD FAX IT ACCROSS TO THEIR LEGAL DEPARTMENT. THEY SAY THEY WILL GO TO COURT- (YES I DO NOT THINK SO). WELL IF THEY DO, MY HUSBAND HAS ALREADY TOLD THEM THAT THEY WILL HAVE TO MEET HIS COSTS ETC AND OF COURSE FULL DISCLOSURE! THEY CAN NOT SAY THAT THE HALIFAX ACCOUNT STILL HAS A BALANCE WHEN IT HAS BEEN PAID THIS IS ABSOULUTELY LUDRICUS. THESE PEOPLE NEED EDUCATING ABOUT ABUSING THE SYSTEM AND WASTING EVERYONES TIME.

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst not blowing my own trumpet, I had a very good experience with the Halifax. My full amount (£565) was credited to my card account just after I send the LBA.

 

Although they are not sticking to their telling, at least they are negotiating at the defence stage, as to waiting for AQs and court dates etc.

 

Your nearly there...

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

AS v HALIFAX CARD SERVICES

My hubby has issued a MCOL against the Halifax Card Services, they issued a defence stating that they have paid in full on GOGW. Now that posses a big BUT they have transferred the money into a closed and fully paid up account. It was an account which Eversheds Solicitors acting on behalf of the Halifax agreed a settlement with a discount of £700 approx, my hubby paid the figure as they requested in Aug 2005. Eversheds then sent a letter confirming that that account was now closed and accepted the money in full and final settlement. My hubby has faxed a copy of that letter to Kofi at Halifax Legal Services and he does not believe that it is genuine.

 

My hubby has been going round the houses and again spoke with Eversheds who again confirmed to him that this account is dead and burried, he managed today to get KOFI to call Eversheds, they are arranging to send the same letter that my hubby has already forwarded to them.

 

So whilst they have agreed to pay as per the defence, they will not release the money to him which amounts to £1,344. If by tomorrow he does not get anywhere with this Kofi in LEGAL SERVICES, he will try and contact the Chief Executve, I believe his name is Andy Hornby. If anyone knows his direct line or email it would be very much appreciated.

 

Eversheds are absolutley stunned and amazed that the letter which they sent to my hubby in Aug 2005 was not good enough for the Halifax even though Kofi spoke to them on the telephone and Eversheds confirmed today what they had written in Aug 2005 and this was good enough evidence by a firm of Solicitors indeed writing to Halifax Legal Services - their client! however as a gesture to assist, Eversheds have agreed that one of their supervisors will email Kofi at the Halifax just to re-iterate and confirm that this matter was dead and burried. When Eversheds spoke with hubby they told him that as Halifax would have told them that upon the final payment that his credit fiile with the credit reference would have altomatically been marked as satisfied, then there should be no problems with the evidence now supplied. They were surprised by the awkwardness of Kofi in LEGAL SERVICES and the Halfax stance in this matter.

 

Has anyone else been given this sort of treatment by the Halifax and does anyone have the direct contact details for Andy Hornby Chief Exec. Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated. ANY HELP PLEASE!!!

thanks

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ds,

 

I'm afraid I am not familiar with Halifax but it seems they are trying it on.

 

I found this in the contact bit but it was dated may 2006:

 

[email protected]

 

This one seems to accept e-mails.

 

(James Crosby is the Chief Executive of Halifax PLC).

 

The chief exec may have changed I couldn't tell you if this is right, perhaps anonymous call to the bank to ask the question may reveal this. I'll have another search and come back.

 

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ds,

 

I'm afraid I am not familiar with Halifax but it seems they are trying it on.

 

I found this in the contact bit but it was dated may 2006:

 

[email protected]

 

This one seems to accept e-mails.

 

(James Crosby is the Chief Executive of Halifax PLC).

 

The chief exec may have changed I couldn't tell you if this is right, perhaps anonymous call to the bank to ask the question may reveal this. I'll have another search and come back.

 

Tanz

Thanx but already found out he resigned and Andy Hornby took over 31/7/2006. But do not have a direct contact number. Anyway, hubby will get to bottom of it tomoz. They have an absolute cheek to hold back they money when they say they are paying it.

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

mailto:[email protected]

 

Correction.

 

So are they saying they wont pay him because of an old debt that has been settled in full but they seem to think it is still outstanding?

 

If so I would write rather than ring, or use the email address here. At least you have a copy of this and can use it in further correspondence.

 

Not sure if that helps but it does seem odd. I would say they are trying it on though. Have you any reciepts that the money was paid?

 

HTH

Link to post
Share on other sites

mailto:[email protected]

 

Correction.

 

So are they saying they wont pay him because of an old debt that has been settled in full but they seem to think it is still outstanding?

 

If so I would write rather than ring, or use the email address here. At least you have a copy of this and can use it in further correspondence.

 

Not sure if that helps but it does seem odd. I would say they are trying it on though. Have you any reciepts that the money was paid?

 

HTH

 

Yes I agree with you and thankyou for the email address, I will pass that on to hubby. He has the letter which Eversheds the Solicitors who wrote and receipted the money in full and final settlement his credit file has been marked settled and nothing adverse. So why do they think he still owes the money. He spoke to someone in customer services today and they have paid all the money into the closed account where he cannot touch it!!! bo hooooo.......

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree with you and thankyou for the email address, I will pass that on to hubby. He has the letter which Eversheds the Solicitors who wrote and receipted the money in full and final settlement his credit file has been marked settled and nothing adverse. So why do they think he still owes the money. He spoke to someone in customer services today and they have paid all the money into the closed account where he cannot touch it!!! bo hooooo.......

DS

 

I feel a stiff letter explaining that this is not acceptable and that you expect a cheque within 3, 5 or 7 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...