Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Highview/DCB(L) ANPR PCN Claimform - Bradfield Road Car Park S6 2bw


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 771 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello I've received from County Court business centre a notice to pay 

 

Amount claimed £189.65 

Court fee               £  35.00

Legal rep cost      £  50.00

Total                       £274.65

 

According to their claim against me the date being 20/11/2018 for a motability car as I'm disabled and also have severe depression along with other illnesses.

 

I trade my car in every 3 years so my details are always upto date. I traded xxxxxx in on the 19/12/18.

 

I have  no recollection of what they say.

They say I received a PCN and that I agreed to pay within 28days but did not.

This is all LIES I haven't received anything ever up until now.

 

This was 4 years ago and I'm receiving this for the first time.

I have phoned CCBC and they told me to email them explaining why I'm refusing to pay. 

I asked who was DCB Legal Ltd was and they told me its Highway Parking solicitors.

 

I've attached the first page of the claim form from them.

I have read a few of your advice regarding this company and I saw you have said that someone would do well to check with DVLA and find out whether the signage has moved from 3 hour staying to 1 1/2  hour stay because a few people have been receiving similar to myself.

 

Please can you help me because I'm an honest person and would never not have paid if I knew I was in the wrong and received what they say I have.

This has really affected my mental health.

 

Thankyou I await you advice

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's very strange that you received no paperwork before.  Have you moved since November 2018?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

And did you update the car log book immediately with the DVLA?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please complete this:

 

 

i see you've written penalty charge notice on that totally unredacted scan of the claimform..  Its not one of those,a fine, its a scam speculative invoice.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which Court have you received the claim from ?

 

MCOL Northampton N1 YES

 

Name of the Claimant : Highview Parking LTD

 

Claimants Solicitors: DCB Legal Ltd

 

Date of issue – 16-02-22

 

Date for AOS - 04-03-22

 

Date to submit Defence - 18-03-22

 

What is the claim for  

1. The Defendant(D) is indebted to the Claimant (C) for a Parking Charge(s) issued to vehicle lat Bradfield Road Car Park
S6 2bw

 

2. The PCN details are 20/11/2018 

 

3.The PCN(s) was issued on private land owned or managed by C.

 

4.The vehicle was parked in breach of the Terms on Cs signs (the Contract), thus incurring the PCN(s).

 

4. The driver agreed to pay within 28 days but did not. D is liable as the driver or keeper. Despite requests, the PCN(s) is
outstanding.

 

5.The Contract entitles C to damages.


AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS
1. £155 being the total of the PCN(s) and damages.

2. Interest at a rate of 8% per annum pursuant to s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 from the date hereof at a daily rate
of £0.02 until judgment or sooner payment.

3. Costs and court fees
 

 

 

What is the value of the claim?

 

 

Amount Claimed £189.65

court fees £35

legal rep fees £50

Total Amount £274.65

...........................

 

I've written penalty charge notice because I didn't know what PCN was short for.

 

I dont understand when you say its a scam speculative notice?

 

Also I'm not computer savvy so when you ask me to copy and paste and do the rest of it I dont understand you.

 

I've already said I'd spoken on the telephone to County Court Business Centre and they told ne to email them with my rejection for this claim and they in turn will send to their solicitor and depending on there answer I will know if they will drop the case or see it through.

 

Also someone had said that 4 years ago this Highview company didn't have 1 and a half hour stay as it was 3 hours stay. 

I have never received any notice of any kind what so ever.

 

You asked for details again that are on the claim form I sent.

 

Sorry but you are confusing me

Claimform.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

DVLA hold your address in two places and while they may update one of your addresses they don't update the other one at the same time.

 

They have a driver register and a vehicle register and they treat them separately which is annoying since if you notify them of a change of address you would think they would at the minimum ask if you want to update the other register at the same time.

 

So that might be an avenue worth checking if just to eliminate the possibility of there being another PCN somewhere in the pipeline.

 

As you probably know that if you are in a Motability scheme you have to pay outstanding parking tickets. for your peace of mind these are not Penalty charge notices but are called Parking Charge Notices. They are highly speculative invoices  and operated by some very dubious companies. 

 

I would send then a SAR in the first place to

a] delay proceedings so that you can find out what the alleged breach is and

b] to find out where all previous paperwork has gone.

 

Included in the SAR will be the original PCN with the address they sent it to plus all other reminders and legal papers they send prior to the last one you have just received.

 

You will find the SAR template in the CAG library.

Just send it without alteration and ask them to hold on with the legal matter till you have received their papers.

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

an sar will not hold court proceedings.

 

20 hours ago, Gail hunt said:

I've already said I'd spoken on the telephone to County Court Business Centre and they told ne to email them with my rejection for this claim and they in turn will send to their solicitor and depending on there answer I will know if they will drop the case or see it through.

 

 

no you do not do the above ..

 

you have to follow court protocol.

 

as for that sticky that you cant copy and paste

i'll do it for you in my next post later

 

in the meantime please do the following: it is IMPORTANT TO GET THEM DONE ASAP

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform

.

register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
Go to HMRC's login page.


Click the GREEN sign in button.
Click “Create sign in details”
Enter your email address where asked.
You will now be emailed a confirmation code. ...


You will now be issued with a User ID for your government gateway account.
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 

then log in to the MCOL Website

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim


type your name ONLY


no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

………….

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey we dont ever mind.

after all this is a voluntary free site. 

 

if we didnt like 100's as you we'd not help would we.

 

all easily sorted and you'll beat them 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope you dont await their response.

you MUST file a defence by day 33 from the date on the claimform whereby that that is 1 in the count

 

plenty of time but you must now generally get upto speed 

 

use the search in our top red banner type in

 

PCN+Claimform

 

that will bring up like threads to yours

read about 20-30 of them.

 

understand whats to come, how to react, what to do and what is next.

 

but dont do ANYTHING without ever checking here FIRST. 

 

did you pop up on MCOL and do AOS 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Highview/DCB(L) ANPR PCN Claimform - Bradfield Road Car Park S6 2bw

all details in about post 10 now 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

around post 10 the questionnaire - i've filled it in for you.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Which Court have you received the claim from ?

MCOL Northampton N1 YES

 

Name of the Claimant : Highview Parking LTD

Claimants Solicitors: DCB Legal Ltd

Date of issue – 16-02-22

Date for AOS - 04-03-22

Date to submit Defence - 18-03-22

 

What is the claim for – 

 

1. The Defendant(D) is indebted to the Claimant (C) for a Parking Charge(s) issued to vehicle lat Bradfield Road Car Park

S6 2bw

2. The PCN details are 20/11/2018 

3.The PCN(s) was issued on private land owned or managed by C.

4.The vehicle was parked in breach of the Terms on Cs signs (the Contract), thus incurring the PCN(s).

4. The driver agreed to pay within 28 days but did not. D is liable as the driver or keeper. Despite requests, the PCN(s) is

outstanding.

5.The Contract entitles C to damages.

 

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

1. £155 being the total of the PCN(s) and damages.

 

2. Interest at a rate of 8% per annum pursuant to s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 from the date hereof at a daily rate

of £0.02 until judgment or sooner payment.

 

3. Costs and court fees

What is the value of the claim?

Amount Claimed £189.65

court fees £35

legal rep fees £50

Total Amount £274.65

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wasnt asking you to repeat it

just note its done

 

now get reading up.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When it's all over you will feel better as well as better off when you end up having to pay nothing. And under the new Code of Practice, their charges have already been described by the Government as a rip off so if it ever gets to Court the extra charges will have no chance.of getting past a Judge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you make perfect sense, I need to stand up for myself and fight this because I dont like that they have lied about me.

Also I wonder how many have paid something similar because its scary when you first get this form.

 

I had a wobble but I will carry on and I'm glad I have your services to guide me.

 

So thankful 

 

Gail 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

id be removing the claim number if i was you??

 

hidden.

 

thats a std letter the court sending acking the receipt of your defence

which we didnt know you'dfiled?

we've not seen it

post it up please

 

they have 28 days to do something.

 

id also not be having little PM chats as can be seen above

you've done something without checking here FIRST.

 

schoolboy mistakes could slip through

please keep all comms in the open forum.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...