Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
    • This other entity doesn't know what's going on.  To be clear I had huge equity.  No-one would ever expect a lender to erode all my equity.  The question is - if anyone knows the legal answer - on the basis they have a charging order - could they make an application for an order for sale?  
    • Is this place near to you? I ask for two reasons. If you can easily go back, then get photos of the signs.  On GM and Parkopedia there are various comments about the signs being pants. Also go back to the school uniform shop and ask the manager there for contact details for the retail park (which I've Googled & Googled and got nowhere).  The school uniform shop will just be tenants of the retail park, they won't be able to do anything.  It will be the retail park that called EPC in, and we've seen loads of cases where the organ grinder has intervened and called off the monkey.  As for EPC, aye, ignore them until LoC stage.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

traceyjsmith v HSBC ** WON **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6270 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

if you want wording for unless letter - try bong's t hread last post or two.

still trying to get answer on when - but can't hurt.

also, try ringing dg again today - i still think you can bug them into action.

 

i feel like they are all just sitting there watching them all go to aq - having nervous breakdowns or whatever - maybe they'd like to clear a few out - try it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hi there

 

I've pasted guidot's letter in here from my thread so its easier for you to find

 

I think you are after a letter to send to the court

'The last date for filing the Allocation Questionnaires was the x, the Claimant filed this document on the x, however it is understood that the Defendant has yet to file the same.

 

Accordingly, it is requested that the court issues directions to the effect that the Defence is struck out without further order and judgement entered for the Claimant, unless the Defendant issues the Allocation Questionnaire within 7 days.'

 

no need to wait I'd say, but if the court's snowed under it might not get it done any faster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just phoned DG and actually spoke to Kate Eaves. She wanted to know where I got her phone number from so I informed her it was from the very helpful people on this website HeeHee! She said that an offer letter was sent on thursday 1st feb HOOOOORAAAY only problem is I have not had it. She said she will look into it and if necessary send another. Fingers crossed I might get it today, just a shame that the postman doesn't get here until lunchtime. Will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got home and found an offer letter on the mat. Not the full amonut though, they say that I claimed for 2 monthes too many which is not true I went back to october 2000 as that is when i sent the data protection letter, which I think is wrong but my initial request for payment was sent 14 nov but DG have said that I can not claim from before dec 00 is this right or are they taking the mick?? They also will not pay up for stopped cheques & spec presentation, so all in all they have dropped £117.80 off my claim. I don't know what to do, I am tempted to take it but am a bit annoyed about the nov 00 charges any advice????

Link to post
Share on other sites

you aint gonna like this tracey...

 

stopped cheques and specials are valid fees.

 

they are also right in saying that the charges for oct and nov fall outside the statutory 6 year period as the relevant date is 6 years back from issue of court claim. there are arguments for challenging the limitation period as you probably have noticed around the forum. but this will require work and you would have to wait quite a while longer to resolve it and there is no guarantee you would win your case for that bit of the claim. they may even go to court over that issue in which case you would have to be prepared to wait until the hearing to get your money, and only then if the court agrees with your case.

 

then again for £100 odd they may not bother to go to court over it and one extra letter saying you don't agree might result in a payment. Its a tough decision but if you don't fancy going to court then I'd say accept the offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is ahppening a lot see last few posts on bongs thread and mine.

 

It is looking as though you can only claim 6 years back from submission of MCOL. They did the same to me. Not sure what I am going to do but case is still proceeding in court.

 

Only you can decide whether it is enough.

 

Just get in a cheque if you have debts to them

4th January 2008 - Prelim sent

16th January 2008 - Standard reply - NO!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh bugger looks like I will have to accept then. One last thing on the pre-written bit of paper I have to sign it accept it has a confidentiality bit on it saying that I promise to keep their payment a secret! I am really loathed to sign it, can I just write my own acceptance letter possibly with a bit about wanting the money within 14 days or else court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Date

Dear Whoever

Ref: Your Offer of Settlement

 

Account: xxxxxxxx

Sort Code xx-xx-xx

Claim No: XXXXX in XXXX County Court

 

I acknowledge receipt of your letter date xx/xx/xx and your settlement offer of £XXX

 

I accept your offer as full and final settlement only for this claim of bank charges made on my account between xx/xx/xx and xx/xx/xx(dates of first and last charge)

 

I accept this offer without prejudice and I reserve the right to make any further claims should you apply future charges that may be considered unlawful under common law or in violation of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 or Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I am also not prepared to agree to any confidentially clauses you try to impose, unless of course your client wishes to make an offer of due consideration in addition to the amount of £xxxxx, in order to be afforded this privilege by myself.

 

I trust that you will find this arrangement acceptable.

 

Yours Sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh bugger looks like I will have to accept then. One last thing on the pre-written bit of paper I have to sign it accept it has a confidentiality bit on it saying that I promise to keep their payment a secret! I am really loathed to sign it, can I just write my own acceptance letter possibly with a bit about wanting the money within 14 days or else court?

 

you can cross out the confidentiality bit and initial it. even if you didn't it isn't binding on you anyway - under contract law they would have had to have made you a separate offer just to keep it quiet, like £50 or something. you could say you want it in 14 days but if it doesn't happen what would you then do? I think accept, and then if the money hasn't been received before any future court deadlines appear, like filing your court bundle, make sure you comlpy with what you have to do, in case you end up having to go to court. don't withdraw your claim until the money has cleared.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i used to work on the floor above dg when i worked for Forward Trust - part of HSBC. gosh if i knew then what i know now - i could have hand delivered everybodies breakdowns haha - perhaps breakdowns is not such a good word to use, they seem to be heading for one big massive one :D

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

gee, go away for a couple of hours and see what happens!

you've had them all here today trace - crusher, bong and a mb letter. - you've had it all. so, ok with all of it - write your own acceptance letter - only dates from the beginning of claim and i guess you got it all - mcol fee? good on ya, i think you're there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...