Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Aesmith - Thank you for your recent interest in my issues.  Input on people's topics can be most useful from specialised experts or those that have similar experiences.  Some people really struggle with knowing what to do (I certainly do) - so it is most useful and helpful and reassuring when solid sensible advice is offered.  I have found there to be some very kind, helpful, supportive and legally knowledgeable people here on cag over the years - who give sound legal advice for people to roll up their sleeves and follow up on.   Of course, sometimes it can be quite challenging sifting the wheat from the chaff.  I don't have lawyer or barrister.  I sometimes attend pro-bono legal clinics for help.  And sometimes have access to barristers via a pro-bono service called Advocate.  Both ad-hoc. 
    • The Judge was wrong. The keeper is only INVITED to say who was driving, there is no obligation for them to say.
    • Member of the Question Time audience asks Richard Tice about Donald Trump.    
    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

traceyjsmith v HSBC ** WON **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6271 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

if you want wording for unless letter - try bong's t hread last post or two.

still trying to get answer on when - but can't hurt.

also, try ringing dg again today - i still think you can bug them into action.

 

i feel like they are all just sitting there watching them all go to aq - having nervous breakdowns or whatever - maybe they'd like to clear a few out - try it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hi there

 

I've pasted guidot's letter in here from my thread so its easier for you to find

 

I think you are after a letter to send to the court

'The last date for filing the Allocation Questionnaires was the x, the Claimant filed this document on the x, however it is understood that the Defendant has yet to file the same.

 

Accordingly, it is requested that the court issues directions to the effect that the Defence is struck out without further order and judgement entered for the Claimant, unless the Defendant issues the Allocation Questionnaire within 7 days.'

 

no need to wait I'd say, but if the court's snowed under it might not get it done any faster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just phoned DG and actually spoke to Kate Eaves. She wanted to know where I got her phone number from so I informed her it was from the very helpful people on this website HeeHee! She said that an offer letter was sent on thursday 1st feb HOOOOORAAAY only problem is I have not had it. She said she will look into it and if necessary send another. Fingers crossed I might get it today, just a shame that the postman doesn't get here until lunchtime. Will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got home and found an offer letter on the mat. Not the full amonut though, they say that I claimed for 2 monthes too many which is not true I went back to october 2000 as that is when i sent the data protection letter, which I think is wrong but my initial request for payment was sent 14 nov but DG have said that I can not claim from before dec 00 is this right or are they taking the mick?? They also will not pay up for stopped cheques & spec presentation, so all in all they have dropped £117.80 off my claim. I don't know what to do, I am tempted to take it but am a bit annoyed about the nov 00 charges any advice????

Link to post
Share on other sites

you aint gonna like this tracey...

 

stopped cheques and specials are valid fees.

 

they are also right in saying that the charges for oct and nov fall outside the statutory 6 year period as the relevant date is 6 years back from issue of court claim. there are arguments for challenging the limitation period as you probably have noticed around the forum. but this will require work and you would have to wait quite a while longer to resolve it and there is no guarantee you would win your case for that bit of the claim. they may even go to court over that issue in which case you would have to be prepared to wait until the hearing to get your money, and only then if the court agrees with your case.

 

then again for £100 odd they may not bother to go to court over it and one extra letter saying you don't agree might result in a payment. Its a tough decision but if you don't fancy going to court then I'd say accept the offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is ahppening a lot see last few posts on bongs thread and mine.

 

It is looking as though you can only claim 6 years back from submission of MCOL. They did the same to me. Not sure what I am going to do but case is still proceeding in court.

 

Only you can decide whether it is enough.

 

Just get in a cheque if you have debts to them

4th January 2008 - Prelim sent

16th January 2008 - Standard reply - NO!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh bugger looks like I will have to accept then. One last thing on the pre-written bit of paper I have to sign it accept it has a confidentiality bit on it saying that I promise to keep their payment a secret! I am really loathed to sign it, can I just write my own acceptance letter possibly with a bit about wanting the money within 14 days or else court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Date

Dear Whoever

Ref: Your Offer of Settlement

 

Account: xxxxxxxx

Sort Code xx-xx-xx

Claim No: XXXXX in XXXX County Court

 

I acknowledge receipt of your letter date xx/xx/xx and your settlement offer of £XXX

 

I accept your offer as full and final settlement only for this claim of bank charges made on my account between xx/xx/xx and xx/xx/xx(dates of first and last charge)

 

I accept this offer without prejudice and I reserve the right to make any further claims should you apply future charges that may be considered unlawful under common law or in violation of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 or Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I am also not prepared to agree to any confidentially clauses you try to impose, unless of course your client wishes to make an offer of due consideration in addition to the amount of £xxxxx, in order to be afforded this privilege by myself.

 

I trust that you will find this arrangement acceptable.

 

Yours Sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh bugger looks like I will have to accept then. One last thing on the pre-written bit of paper I have to sign it accept it has a confidentiality bit on it saying that I promise to keep their payment a secret! I am really loathed to sign it, can I just write my own acceptance letter possibly with a bit about wanting the money within 14 days or else court?

 

you can cross out the confidentiality bit and initial it. even if you didn't it isn't binding on you anyway - under contract law they would have had to have made you a separate offer just to keep it quiet, like £50 or something. you could say you want it in 14 days but if it doesn't happen what would you then do? I think accept, and then if the money hasn't been received before any future court deadlines appear, like filing your court bundle, make sure you comlpy with what you have to do, in case you end up having to go to court. don't withdraw your claim until the money has cleared.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i used to work on the floor above dg when i worked for Forward Trust - part of HSBC. gosh if i knew then what i know now - i could have hand delivered everybodies breakdowns haha - perhaps breakdowns is not such a good word to use, they seem to be heading for one big massive one :D

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

gee, go away for a couple of hours and see what happens!

you've had them all here today trace - crusher, bong and a mb letter. - you've had it all. so, ok with all of it - write your own acceptance letter - only dates from the beginning of claim and i guess you got it all - mcol fee? good on ya, i think you're there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...