Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

money owed to bank by my late brother


marksheff
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 797 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello

i need a bit of advice regarding a debt with a bank by my late brother

 

its for 4k but the bank are now writing to me re:his estate

 

as it stands he as no capital but does own a house which i live in,

no probate has yet been done, but the bank are saying they will do their investigations to see if there is probate or information held by the land registry,

 

obviously his name is on the deeds so were does it leave me?

 

I'm in no position to pay the debt and don't see why i should,  but is really necessary for a bank to do this for a small (ish)  amount of money.

 

thanks  

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, there was no will,

it is possible he does owe money to utility company's other than that I'm unaware,

 

he has no family apart from me,

obviously ive inherited the house due to circumstances.

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

excuse me asking

when did he die?

 

you might no owe either, don't just 'give-in' because you get lots of legal twaddle thrown your way.

 

could you expand slightly on the story

with a bit more detail and a few dates etc. of important events.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

he passed away in April 2021 unexpected

no will in place

 

ive lived in his house since aug 2018 I'm the only living sibling,

 

the debt is through an overdraft/charges which come about during lock down. so the bank have put his account in my name and ive written to them explaining the circumstances and are assuming i am his nok with out even asking me.

 

ive spoke to the bereavement team today and they are saying theIr investigations are looking for any probate done and on the land registry,

 

to me it seams a lot of messing about for just 4k. 

Edited by dx100uk
added A few blank lines only..dx
Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean that in taking out letters of administration you will be taking on a legal duty to pay your late brother's debts out of his estate.

 

See the oath for administrators, para 5: 

Quote

 

5.

[I OR We] will

(a) collect, get in and administer according to law the real and personal estate of the deceased;

 

 

administering according to law includes paying out of his estate the debts owed by the deceased .

Edited by mantis shrimp
quote correct form!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

so the bank have put his account in my name

 

Cant do that...its not your debt...you haven't signed anything or agreed to this I hope ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have in the past acted for a creditor in getting an Insolvency Administration Order (effectively bankruptcy) to control an estate where the heirs were, like you at present, doing nothing. But that is probably too much hassle and cost for the amount at stake here.

 

The bank might well sit and wait for you to need to take out letters of administration. You will not be able to sell or mortgage the house without it. Or are you planning to leave an untidy situation for your heirs to sort out?

 

This might be a case where you can agree a reduced amount or instalment terms, or both, with the bank. If they understand that they will need to spend a disproportionate sum to get anything this might be attractive to the bank.

Edited by mantis shrimp
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bank having you for a fool

ignore them and the silly util company

 

Debts are almost 1yrs old.

 

i will guess as asked you've not signed anything with anyone.. As its bit stupid to sign up to a debt!!

 

were you there when the util bill was run up?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

my intention is to do probate if i decide to sell, I myself have no family so no debt will be passed on.as for the bank ive not signed or agreed to anything, the bloke from the bank did ask me to send an email confirming the information regarding probate or land registry which i have no intention of doing so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

stuff and all they can do .............

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This about 2 things. 

 

1. Your late brother's debts and how his estate is dealt with. 

 

2. the potential for you to have personal liability as administrator if you take out letters of administration or for dealing with his estate if you don't. 

 

Another step the bank might take would be as creditor to apply for letters of administration. This would give it the power to sell the house. Note also that bank's charges for acting as executors or administrators of the estates of deceased persons are eye-watering: you would wish you had engaged the very best solicitor in your area instead.  So if the bank shows signs of going down that route, settle quickly: you will see more out of your brother's estate. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

my intention is to do probate if i decide to sell

 

You have to do probate irrespective......simply to transfer the property into your name once you have your Letter of Administration in place.

I assume there is no mortgage on the property your brother had no other assets apart from the property.

 

Which group of vipers sorry Bank is this ?

Who told them about the property ?

 

Andy

  • Like 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Quote

so i think I'm up that creek without a paddle

From your responses it appears you are falling for their twaddle and threats.....no more contact they have the Death Certificate leave it at that.

 

And if they do a search what will that prove ?  Yes he owned a property...that does not mean that there will be an estate and pot of money for them to get their measly 4K back.

 

You are the sole beneficiary...you inherit the property.....their debt does not transfer to you...they can only try to recover it from his estate.

There is no estate......ignore them see if they wish to start an expensive law suite to claw back 4K an unenforceable overdraft debt most probably 90% created by themselves with fees interest and charges. 

 

 

.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct ignore them.

dont be a mug

or be a mug to the do-gooder solicitors types that have always advised otherwise cause they know the outcome but just wanna scam you out of a few £100's writing pointless letters that say the same thing as ignore but in legalese to make themselves look important.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...