Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EVRi has lost my parcel - court claim issued


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 599 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, hope someone has an answer for me here.

 

I sold a music production unit on eBay on 2nd of February (evening). It was sold for around £500.

 

I packed it, bought a EVRi 48 hour shipping service through Parcel2Go and dropped it off the next morning (3rd February) at the same EVRi drop-off shop I have been using for years.

 

I received a receipt from the shop owner as evidence that I've posted the item, plus a tracking code.

 

After a day (4th February) I looked up the tracking number provided by EVRi only to see that 'The package has been dropped off and is waiting to be picked up by our driver.' Strange as they normally pick up shipments every afternoon,

 

I went to the drop-off shop and the shop owner said all the packages were indeed collected the day before by EVRi.

 

On 6th of February I received a message from the buyer saying the item purchased had not arrived. I see the tracking information provided by EVRi and the status is still as it was 3 days ago (waiting to be collected from the drop-off shop).

 

I told the buyer to wait until 8th of February in case this is only a tracking issue. But as I feared the item did not arrive.

 

I have been unable to reach out to EVRi despite many attempts through phone, email and their websites. Their customer services, both online and on the phone are nonexistent and useless, with only bots giving standard answers to queries.

 

I believe it will be the right thing to refund the buyer as they did not receive the item they rightly purchased. Hence, I am thinking of taking 'EVRi Parcelnet Limited' (The Company) to a small claims court for the full price of the item (as stated when purchasing the courier service) plus delivery cost, on the basis of lack of communication and losing my parcel.

 

Things for me:

Having a receipt and tracking information as evidence that the Company has received my parcel

 

Having the Company's tracking information showing that my parcel is still in the drop-off shop (however, it most likely isn't)

 

Zero communication from the Company in answering my multiple queries

 

The item sent is not in the listed of prohibited and/or non-compensation items in the Company's T&C

 

Things against me:

not having the package insured.

 

I am no legal expert however I would argue that the Company have not done their due diligence in delivering my parcel since they have lost it.

 

If this was a damaged parcel case I could have understood that this could have been due to me packing the parcel to a poor standard, however there should be no excuse in losing a parcel.

 

What do you think? Worth taking them to a small claims court for this?

 

Thanks in advance

Dan

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is absolutely worth taking this to a small claims court. You will win. We will help you.

Please start off by reading around the Hermes stories on this sub- forum. There are lots of them – and there have been lots of discussions about the enforceability or otherwise of the insurance requirement – which we have said is unfair.

As it happens there is a recent judgement where the judge confirms that the insurance requirement is unfair. I'm in the middle of obtaining a transcript of this and we will make it available to people who sue Hermes or any other courier company and the issue of the insurance becomes a factor.

 

Start reading and come back here when you understand the principles and the steps to take

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can take your pick of the two .

 

Best thing to do is start doing the reading and then make a decision .

 

Maybe parcel2go as you contracted directly with them

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @BankFodder. I have contacted both Hermes and Parcel2Go for an answer.

 

Hermes said they'd give me an answer tomorrow (72 hours).

Parcel2Go have told me a response and investigation into my case will take a minimum of 7 days, up to 22nd February!

 

Should I await their response and then send the letter of claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprise, surprise. This is what I have received from Hermes. TLDR: they are admitting to losing the parcel, however telling me to go to Parcel2Go because I purchased the service from them. Is this the right time to ask Hermes for compensation as beneficial third-party under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999? Thanks. 

 

ghbkNCz.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's up to you. You can go for either of them but you may as well send a letter of claim to Hermes.

Stand by for a fuller reply tomorrow

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on what I've read on this forum I already expect them to tell me "you haven't insured the parcel, so take a few quid and begone".

 

I've already readied a draft Letter of Claim. Attached and waiting to finalise when they use the above counterargument.

 

Letter of Claim DRAFT.pdf

Edited by Dankeepsie
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had earlier on suggested a draft letter of claim to Hermes – and maybe you saw it before I removed it from the thread.

I think in the circumstances I would suggest that you sue parcel2go.

I have certain reasons for this and they will become clear in the next few weeks but I think that this will be the way to go.

 

If you are happy with that then your letter of claim is fine with the obvious amendments that it should be addressed to P2G instead of Hermes.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been reading about guys waiting for 1 year to get some money back from Parcel2Go.com. It is not very assuring...

 

The defence from Parcel2Go.com seems to be the standard, as below. What defence do I have defence against this?

 

Upon entering the value £X, the following pop-up message was received: “Don't get caught without enough protection should the unexpected happen. You can protect your parcel up to the value of £5,000.00

  • Yes, I would like to protect my £X parcel against loss or damage for £Y exc VAT.
  • No, I'm willing to risk my £X parcel. I'm not worried about potential loss or damage.”

The Claimant declined the option to protect their goods fully, instead they continued their booking process, filling in all necessary details to continue. Prior to accepting the Terms and paying for the service, the Claimant is provided with another pop-up message, again this recommends the Claimant protect their goods fully against loss or damage. The Claimant declines this option and accepts the Terms and Conditions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry, in this case is going to be much quicker.

 

The kind of no insurance defence that you are referring to is used by Hermes as well. There's really no difference.


We are giving you a very serious recommendation here – sue parceltogo

Please confirm that you are going to take this advice. It is very important

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@BankFodder

 

I will be taking action against Parcel2Go.com Limited based on the recommendation here.

 

Parcel2Go.com have asked me to wait until 22nd February to get back to me. Based on my contact with Hermes, we already know the parcel is "lost". However I believe I have to wait for Parcel2Go.com to review my case before I can act against them.

 

 

xnZZlew.png

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't cede control to them .

You aren't bound by their deadlines and if you send them a 14-day letter of claim now then they will have their deadline as well.

And also you won't waste any time before starting action

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please see the letter of claim attached.

 

If you don't see any issues with it I will send it first thing tomorrow morning.

 

I will send it via the Signed For 1st Class so I have evidence of when they have received it. This might become handy should they miss their 14-day window excusing that they hadn't received the letter (I have seen them making this claim in forum stories).

 

Thanks in advance

Parcel2Go.com 1.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's fine.  Send it now and register with the county court moneyclaim website and prepare your claim.

 

Post the draft of it here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @BankFodder

Please see Particulars of Claim drafted below:

 

The claimant used Parcel2Go.com Limited to post an item. The value of the item is £480.00, as claimed on Parcel2Go.com when purchasing the service on 02/02/2020 plus delivery cost of £5.64.
The parcel was dropped off at the Hermes ParcelShop as directed on 03/02/2020.
The parcel was failed to be delivered.
The claimant contacted Parcel2Go.com on 08/02/2022 to ask for the status of the parcel. No answer was given by the Parcel2Go.com despite their own deadline of 22/02/2022.
Letter of claim was sent on 22/02/2022 to ask for reimbursement with no response.
I will provide the defendant with separate detailed particulars within 14 days after service of the claim form.
The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 02/02/2022 to 08/03/2022 on £485.64 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.10.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You haven't included any reference number and also you should not provide further particulars of claim 14 days later. It adds to complications and is unnecessary .

 

 

Keep your particulars of claim scout and make it sufficiently comprehensive that you don't need to give any other information

Link to post
Share on other sites

@BankFodder Thanks for your help.

 

I have now unticked the option 'You are required to give details of your claim in the box below. If you wish, you may also send detailed particulars direct to the defendant. If you need to do this, please tick here'.

Reference number is not required at the moment, when the claim has been submitted (in 14 days) and issued it will be allocated a claim number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm talking about their reference number. Their tracking number .

If you don't give them a reference number, they won't be able to see what you're talking about.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good point!

 

Please see the updated draft of Particulars of Claim below:

 

Quote

The claimant used Parcel2Go.com Limited to post an item (.....). The value of the item is £480.00, as claimed on Parcel2Go.com when purchasing the service on 02/02/2020 plus delivery cost of £5.64.
The parcel was dropped off at the Hermes ParcelShop as directed on 03/02/2020. The parcel was failed to be delivered.
The claimant contacted Parcel2Go.com on 08/02/2022 to ask for the status of the parcel. No answer was given by the Parcel2Go.com despite their own deadline of 22/02/2022.
Letter of claim was sent on 22/02/2022 to ask for reimbursement with no response.
The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 02/02/2022 to 08/03/2022 on £485.64 and also interest at the same
rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.10.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Parcel2Go have obviously received my letter and have responded quickly.

 

TLDR: I didn't insure the parcel despite being given the option to do so prior to purchasing the service, hence as per their T&C I am not covered for loss.

 

Also they are saying they will not be liable to pay me the market value of my item because it is "subject to depreciation". I have no idea what this means, but my item was a 2nd hand item and I have eBay sale receipts of it, so shouldn't the value of the consignment be the sale price?

 

They have offered to give me £5.64 as a "good will gesture🙃

 

 I am going to reply to this email tomorrow, affirming with my stance on the issue, and that the clock is ticking for them. 

 

Here's Parcel2Go's reply to my letter of claim:

 

Quote

Good Morning ....
I am contacting you following a Letter Before Action.

Please accept our sincerest apologies for the damages to your goods and the resultant inconvenience. I understand when you send any parcels in transit, you do not expect the parcel to be lost before being delivered and this is frustrating when this happens.

During the booking process you were asked to declare the value of your goods and at this point, you would have been given the option of taking extra parcel protection to protect your goods in the case of loss or damage.
As this option was declined no parcel protection was added to your order and we are unable to compensate you for the missing goods.

Please also allow me to direct you to our Terms and Conditions;

6.7 If we are liable to you for any reason, we shall (subject always to clause 7) only be liable to refund to you the cost paid for the Service(s), unless you have purchased Parcel Protection for your Consignment from us.
For the avoidance of doubt, this includes any Parcel Protection that you may require in respect of any items listed on the “Items Protected for Loss Only” and “No Protection Items” lists. No level of Parcel Protection that you purchase from us will render allowable any item which is on the “Prohibited Items” list.

Where you purchase Parcel Protection for your Consignment from us, our liability to you is limited to the lesser of: (i) the value of the Parcel Protection taken out; or (ii) the actual value of the Consignment at the date of loss or damage (as applicable). Where you do not purchase Parcel Protection, you confirm that you accept the risks of not doing so.
We offer two types of Parcel Protection for Consignments:

- Protection for loss or damage
- Protection for loss only

Please note that if you purchase Parcel Protection for loss only, you will not be protected, and we shall not be liable, for any losses that you suffer due to any damage caused to the Consignment other than for up to the cost that you have paid for the Service(s) in circumstances where such damage is caused by our negligence, breach of duty or other wrongful act or omission, and subject to the limitations set out within this clause 6 and clause 7.

Irrespective of the type of Parcel Protection ((i) loss only; or (ii) loss or damage) that you purchase, we will not be liable to repay you the market value of the Consignment as at the time it was purchased by you. Consignments by their nature are subject to depreciation. You must take out a “new for old” compensation policy should you wish to be compensated in this way.
Should you wish to view these in full, Alex, please follow the link which I have provided below;

https://www.parcel2go.com/content/about-terms.aspx

As a goodwill gesture, we have added a refund of the carriage which is £5.64 to your order and this will be processed within 3-5 working days.

Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any further queries, ....

Kindest Regards


.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

no don't play silly letter tennis

please remember you must redact things for YOUR, their and our GDPR compliance.

 

dx

 

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had replied to them 4 days ago and they haven't written anything back to me. The clock is ticking for them.
 

Quote

 

Hello,
 
Thank you for your e-mail.
 
Indeed I did not agree to pay extra for your company to properly do the job it has agreed to do. I shouldn't be insuring you against your own network's criminal activity and/or negligence. This is not a damaged package claim which could have been due to my negligence in safely packing the item. This is a case of stolen/lost item which you/Hermes are responsible for.
 
My consignment was not in the list of prohibited/non-compensation items in your/Hermes list.
 
You still have 12 days to reimburse me for the damage caused. I have no problem taking this claim to the county court.
 
Regards

 

 

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that my site team colleague already suggested that you shouldn't bother responding to them.

Have you registered on the money claim website? Have you prepared your claim? Are you going to post a draft here so that we can have a look?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When is the date for issuing this letter of claim?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...