Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JCI/BW Claimform - old Omni Capital Retail Finance Loan for Training program but provider went bust


clarity99

Recommended Posts

You say your at the bundle stage.....I assume you are preparing or have already prepared your witness statement with disclosures ? In line with your Notice of allocation and the courts directions.

 

Can you upload a copy of your statement and the claimants statement along with any disclosures (all fully redacted )

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to JCI/BW Claimform - old Omni Capital Retail Finance Loan for Training program but provider went bust

At that stage of a preliminary hearing and bundle to produce, hence my late call into the group.

 

If as DX has said, I'm on the wrong route, what would be the best way of dealing with this with the limited timeframe?

 

My plan before my post was:

i) struck out for suing non-entity  (accepting they may simply re-issue)

ii) claim Section 75 'protection' - from Assignee

 

BUT as the Assignee has claimed rights and benefits but not obligations as per Mantis suggestion also now go for a seperate filing against Assignor.

 

If I'm completely way out, please say and if you can give any direction that really would be great.

 

C

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Completely way out ...name change is de minis and easily corrected......defence questioning the assignment onto a loser.

 

Quote

Can you upload a copy of your statement and the claimants statement along with any disclosures (all fully redacted )

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy

 

Easily corrected without re-issue?  Then can I rely on my "embarrased defence" to produce a robust defence?

 

I haven't produced a WS yet, only ~80 pages of correspondence which probably now won't form the WS. There is a financial statement from Assignor which is how I know when the default occurred and assignment took place. A SAR produced lots of correspondence most of which is for the first time and includes a statement from the Assignor dated a week ago, that also hadn't been received.

 

I genuinely appreciate you spending your time on this, and happy to accept criticism and pointing out what I've got wrong but it isn't the same as helping direct me to what I need to change to get it right.............  do you agree with Mantis Shrimp's suggestions?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And did the original creditor file and serve a Default Notice on you pursuant to section 87(1) of the CCA1974 ?

 

You state no in the link questionnaire I asked you to complete.......that's really all you need to defend this claim apart from the obvious that a service was never provided.


Forget the Assignee....a debt buyer that knows absolutely nothing about the debt, the history, the default, they simply bought a disputed debt for pence in the pound.

 

With regards to section 75 ...you have not made any payments.....you have suffered no loss....where does a section 75 come into this ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy

 

Definitely no Default Notice from Assignor or the Assignee... so that's a one line defence, thank you 👍

 

So with s75 as Shrimp is being sued for the full loan paid direct to Provider, if they're expected to pay then the Assignor/Assignee should provide a suitable alternative ie they're responsible per s75........ have I got this wrong and s75 will only apply if the Assignee is successful in Court and Shrimp has to pay and is then in loss?

 

As it is the Assignee who is suing..... can any of the defects with the Assignor be used in my Defence?

Does the Assignee also need to serve a Default Notice?

 

Edited by clarity99
clarity
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, clarity99 said:

Thank you Andy

 

Definitely no Default Notice from Assignor or the Assignee... so that's a one line defence, thank you 👍 The assignee cant issue a default notice as the agreement was most probably already terminated on the sale of the debt (asssignment)

 

So with s75 as Shrimp is being sued for the full loan paid direct to Provider, if they're expected to pay then the Assignor/Assignee should provide a suitable alternative ie they're responsible per s75........ have I got this wrong and s75 will only apply if the Assignee is successful in Court and Shrimp has to pay and is then in loss?

 

Section 75 only applies to the party that made payment to the provider...that not being the defendant in this claim

 

As it is the Assignee who is suing..... can any of the defects with the Assignor be used in my Defence?

No because the assignor (the original creditor) has sold the debt and is no longer responsible ...the assignee is now the legal owner and claimant and owner of the debt and all its obligations.

12 minutes ago, clarity99 said:

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date must you file and serve and exchange witness statements by ?

 

I would suggest you start your draft now and post it here for checking/tweaking .

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Andyorch said:

Section 75 only applies to the party that made payment to the provider...that not being the defendant in this claim

75 Liability of creditor for breaches by supplier.

(1)If the debtor under a debtor-creditor-supplier agreement falling within section 12(b) or (c) has, in relation to a transaction financed by the agreement, any claim against the supplier in respect of a misrepresentation or breach of contract, he shall have a like claim against the creditor, who, with the supplier, shall accordingly be jointly and severally liable to the debtor.

 

I'm confused, if this is a CCA retail finance agreement used to purchase a training course and the course wasn't provided, how can Assignor chase debt but not be required to meet their s75 obligations?

 

Monday 🤒

 

Edited by clarity99
clarity
Link to post
Share on other sites

Because the the assignor is now the legal owner of the debt and the one at loss....what obligations are you referring to ?

 

Re your statement you better get your skates on then today and get a draft to me pronto.....you really need to drop this obsession with the assignee and obligations...the obligation mostly fell away when the Original creditor sold the debt.

 

You  or your son are not party to any section 75 reclaim for monies...section 75 only covers monies paid on a credit card by a consumer to a business.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I take on board that is legally feasible but this is a small claim track claim and would rather over complicate matters when the claim can easily be defended on the facts provided. Also that ship has sailed and permission would be required to submit a Part 20 and add a party to the claim now given that acknowledgment and defence has been submitted and claim allocated and a statement is due by this Monday. 

 

Assignee claims are easily defended because they simply lack the knowledge of disputed debts and what the original creditor has provided in following the correct legal process to enable a valid claim by an assignee.

 

In this case...as far as I'm aware no Pre Action Protocol followed no Default Notice ever served, breaches of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 as a service was never provided by the dissolved company.

 

I cant see any court awarding judgment for debt given the facts above.

 

Best to keep it simple mantis.

 

Andy

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK- so I now see that s75 applies to credit cards and there wasn't any payment made by credit card.......so no protection there.

 

There is the linked agreement I posted that provides similar protection.......

 

Andy- are you saying there is NO defence to an assigned debt?

 

C

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are section within section 75 that would make the original creditor liable and party to the claim as stated by MS...but we are too far down the road now given the lack of time to invoke that option and would involve further expense on your part.

 

Quote

Andy- are you saying there is NO defence to an assigned debt?

 

Absolutely not.....read my last few posts.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So my bulleted defence is:
 

i)  No Defualt Notice served on Defendant by Original Creditor

ii) failures by Original Creditor renders the assignment defective?

iii) Service never provided by Provider... now liquidated

iv) Claim should be dismissed

 

any more than that?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

More or less.......was pre action protocol followed ?

 

Quote

ii) failures by Original Creditor renders the assignment defective?

 

No the assignment is legally valid and very rare you will prove this otherwise...failure of the original creditor to serve a valid default notice renders the claim invalid by the assignee because of  section 87(1) CCA1974.

 

87Need for default notice

(1)Service of a notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 (a " default notice ") is necessary before the creditor or owner can become entitled, by reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement.—

(a)to terminate the agreement, or

(b)to demand earlier payment of any sum, or

(c)to recover possession of any goods or land, or

(d)to treat any right conferred on the debtor or hirer by the agreement as terminated, restricted or deferred, or

(e)to enforce any security.

 

 

WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK

 

 

 

Now with the above in mind have a go at your draft witness statement and get it posted here.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget whats in the sar from the oc

the claimant must produce the nosia and the dn as exhibits, or atleast have concrete proof they were sent. And that does not mean a printout from sone database.

 

so as asked ages ago to see it all and  resisted ...what exhibits are in their ws

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And a copy of their WS if you have received it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you want to move this forward and understand your claimant properly.

 

type in JCI Claimform

in our enhanced google search box.

 

and you'll see lots of information and how we defended, constructed witness statements and in many cases won.

 

no DN? yours it appears is no diff

 

but ....we've still not seen their WS yet, please get it up.

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...