Jump to content


Lowell/Overdales Claim form 3 merged debts - Vanquis Card - New Day Card - Shop Direct CAT


Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio Ltd

 

Date of issue – 18/1/2022

 

Date of issue To Acknowledge 04/02/20222

Days to submit defence = 18/02/2022

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

 

1) The claim comprises the following agreements the defendant entered into:

 

a. <Mail Order Company> with reference ########## and current balance of £####.##

b. <Credit Card Company> with reference ############ and current balance of £###.##

 a < Credit Card Company > with reference ###### and current balance of £####.##

 

The agreements were terminated as payments were not maintained and subsequently assigned to the claimant.

and the claimant claims:

a) The total of the said sums being £####.##

b) Interest persuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, but limited to one year, being £###.##

c) costs

 

Amount claimed £####.##

Court fee £205.00

Legal Representatives costs £100

Total amount £55##

 

 

What is the total value of the claim? G£55##.00
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?Yes
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? 2x Credit Card and One Catalogue
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I think Online
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Not Sure
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned and issued by the purchaser
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not Sure, I don’t think so
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No
 

What was the date of your last payment? Unsure but not statute barred
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

 

 

Just to check, do I do a CCA for each one individually or do I do 3 separate ones and can I put them all in the same envelope. Also is it 3 postal orders for £1each, one for £3, or one for £1.

 

I assume CPR to Overdales who are the acting solicitor.

 

thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Separate CCA x3  payment can be one x £3...yes CPR to Overdales......your defence date will be 17th a Friday 16.00...MCOL shuts down over the weekends so if you submitted Saturday it wont be processed until Monday 21st.

 

Andy.

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell/Overdales Claim form - 2 credit cards + 1 Cat Debt

give us debt details like OC's PB

could make all the difference.

 

and note your corrected dates please

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pb is you....:pound:

 

there are quite a few of these merged lowell claimform threads here

you've probably read them , but in case you haven't ...worthy to read them

in the end they typically fall over or run away.

 

they neve expect a defence to be filed...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell/Overdales Claim form 3 merged debts - Vanquis Card - New Day Card - Shop Direct CAT

you'd think they not try the will you wet yourself route by now on you...:pound:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi folks

 

1) The claim comprises the following agreements the defendant entered into:

 

a. <Mail Order Company> with reference ########## and current balance of £####.##

b. <Credit Card Company> with reference ############ and current balance of £###.##

 a < Credit Card Company > with reference ###### and current balance of £####.##

 

2.The agreements were terminated as payments were not maintained and subsequently assigned to the claimant.

 

and the claimant claims:

a) The total of the said sums being £####.##

b) Interest persuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, but limited to one year, being £###.##

c) costs

 

Amount claimed £####.##

Court fee £205.00

Legal Representatives costs £100

Total amount £55##

 

 

What is the total value of the claim? G£55##.00

 

I have drawn up my defence to submit this week. Please see below, any advice greatly appreciated:-

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph a thru c is accepted insofar that relationships did exist

between the Defendant and each of Shop Direct Financial Services, Vanquis Bank, and New Day Ltd. However the Defendant cannot recall these accounts (Agreements) and the Claimant has yet to supply the Defendant with a copy of the Accounts/Agreements mentioned in particulars of Claim.

 

2. Paragraph 5 is denied, the defendant does not recall any breach and again the Claimant has yet to supply me with a copy of the agreement requested through the PAPDC reply form and CPR 31.14.

 

The Defendant denies failing to maintain the required payments to

Shop Direct Financial Services, Vanquis Bank, and New Day Ltd. It is denied that the Defendant failed to respond to demands for payment sent by the claimant and/or its agents. The Claimant is put to strict proof that any such demands have been sent to the Defendant by the claimant

 

3. Therefore, the defendant denies owing any money to the Claimant and the claimant is put to strict proof:

 

a. Show how the Defendant has entered into an Agreement.

 

b. Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for.

 

c. That the Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated as claimed.

 

d. Show how any breaches occurred and how valid Default Notices were issued.

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed; having been provided with written requests for information under CPR 31.14 and to date have failed to provide any such documentation as detailed on the particulars of claim.

 

5. The Defendant has also provided the claimant directly with a written Section 78 request pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the alleged Shop Direct Financial Services, Vanquis Bank, and New Day Ltd. To date the claimant has failed to provide the requested document copies."

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Thank You again!!

Edited by dx100uk
added poc
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX, I'm not sure what to do here. Do I add the POC to my defence as paragraph 1? or do you want me to amend them in Post 1? I have added the totals and names of OC below:

Edited by PoolerBoy
Link to post
Share on other sites

1) The claim comprises the following agreements the defendant entered into:

 

a. Shop Direct Financial Services with reference ########## and current balance of £481.84

b. Vanquis Bank with reference ############ and current balance of £2560.91

c. New Day Ltd with reference ###### and current balance of £1687.37

 

2.The agreements were terminated as payments were not maintained and subsequently assigned to the claimant.

 

and the claimant claims:

a) The total of the said sums being £4730.12

b) Interest persuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, but limited to one year, being £297.11

c) costs

 

Amount claimed £5027.23

Court fee £205.00

Legal Representatives costs £100

Total amount £5582.23 

 

 

Edited by PoolerBoy
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PoolerBoy said:

2. Paragraph 5 is denied, the defendant does not recall any breach and again the Claimant has yet to supply me with a copy of the agreement requested through the PAPDC reply form and CPR 31.14.

 

the poc has been inserted for you to align your defence para too. it does not form part of your defence

 

cant see where the above is relevant and there is no para 5 in their POC

what are you referring too?

 

your need to address their para 2. also.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this any better?

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1) The claim comprises the following agreements the defendant allegedly entered into:

 

a. Shop Direct Financial Services with reference ########## and current balance of £481.84

b. Vanquis Bank with reference ############ and current balance of £2560.91

c. New Day Ltd with reference ###### and current balance of £1687.37

 

The defendant does not have an recollection of any of these agreements.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is denied. The defendant does not recall any breach and again the Claimant has yet to supply me with a copy of the agreement requested through the PAPDC reply form and CPR 31.14.

 

The Defendant denies failing to maintain the required payments to

Shop Direct Financial Services, Vanquis Bank, and New Day Ltd. It is denied that the Defendant failed to respond to demands for payment sent by the claimant and/or its agents. The Claimant is put to strict proof that any such demands have been sent to the Defendant by the claimant

 

3. Therefore, the defendant denies owing any money to the Claimant and the claimant is put to strict proof:

 

a. Show how the Defendant has entered into an Agreement.

 

b. Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for.

 

c. That the Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated as claimed.

 

d. Show how any breaches occurred and how valid Default Notices were issued.

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed; having been provided with written requests for information under CPR 31.14 and to date have failed to provide any such documentation as detailed on the particulars of claim.

 

5. The Defendant has also provided the claimant directly with a written Section 78 request pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the alleged Shop Direct Financial Services, Vanquis Bank, and New Day Ltd. To date the claimant has failed to provide the requested document copies."

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Edited by PoolerBoy
Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

 

the poc has been inserted for you to align your defence para too. it does not form part of your defence

 

cant see where the above is relevant and there is no para 5 in their POC

what are you referring too?

 

your need to address their para 2. also.

 

Sorry it was a typo and was supposed to address their Para 2

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PoolerBoy said:

2. Paragraph 2 is denied. The defendant does not recall any breach and again the Claimant has yet to supply me with a copy of the agreement requested through the PAPDC reply form and CPR 31.14.

 

breach evidence wont be part of the agreement return.. it will be evidence like default notices etc,.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paragraph 2 amended.

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1) The claim comprises the following agreements the defendant allegedly entered into:

 

a. Shop Direct Financial Services with reference ########## and current balance of £481.84

b. Vanquis Bank with reference ############ and current balance of £2560.91

c. New Day Ltd with reference ###### and current balance of £1687.37

 

The defendant does not have an recollection of any of these agreements.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Claimant has yet to supply the defendant with a copy of the any agreement or other such documents requested through the PAPDC reply form and CPR 31.14.

 

The Defendant denies failing to maintain the required payments to Shop Direct Financial Services, Vanquis Bank, and New Day Ltd. It is denied that the Defendant failed to respond to demands for payment sent by the claimant and/or its agents. The Claimant is put to strict proof that any such demands have been sent to the Defendant by the claimant

 

3. Therefore, the defendant denies owing any money to the Claimant and the claimant is put to strict proof:

 

a. Show how the Defendant has entered into an Agreement.

 

b. Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for.

 

c. That the Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated as claimed.

 

d. Show how any breaches occurred and how valid Default Notices were issued.

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed; having been provided with written requests for information under CPR 31.14 and to date have failed to provide any such documentation as detailed on the particulars of claim.

 

5. The Defendant has also provided the claimant directly with a written Section 78 request pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the alleged Shop Direct Financial Services, Vanquis Bank, and New Day Ltd. To date the claimant has failed to provide the requested document copies."

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, PoolerBoy said:

Defendant by the claimant

Nor by the original creditors.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah...found it

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1) The claim comprises the following agreements the defendant allegedly entered into:

 

a. Shop Direct Financial Services with reference ########## and current balance of £481.84

b. Vanquis Bank with reference ############ and current balance of £2560.91

c. New Day Ltd with reference ###### and current balance of £1687.37

 

The defendant does not have an recollection of any of these agreements.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Claimant has yet to supply the defendant with a copy of the any agreement or other such documents requested through the PAPDC reply form and CPR 31.14.

 

The Defendant denies failing to maintain the required payments to Shop Direct Financial Services, Vanquis Bank, and New Day Ltd. It is denied that the Defendant failed to respond to demands for payment sent by the claimant and/or its agents. The Claimant is put to strict proof that any such demands have been sent to the Defendant by the claimant or the Original Creditors.

 

3. Therefore, the defendant denies owing any money to the Claimant and the claimant is put to strict proof:

 

a. Show how the Defendant has entered into an Agreement.

 

b. Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for.

 

c. That the Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated as claimed.

 

d. Show how any breaches occurred and how valid Default Notices were issued.

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed; having been provided with written requests for information under CPR 31.14 and to date have failed to provide any such documentation as detailed on the particulars of claim.

 

5. The Defendant has also provided the claimant directly with a written Section 78 request pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the alleged Shop Direct Financial Services, Vanquis Bank, and New Day Ltd. To date the claimant has failed to provide the requested document copies."

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting there i think

not due till friday

let @Andyorch check it 1st please

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) The claim comprises the following agreements the defendant entered into:

 

a. Shop Direct Financial Services with reference ########## and current balance of £481.84

b. Vanquis Bank with reference ############ and current balance of £2560.91

c. New Day Ltd with reference ###### and current balance of £1687.37

 

2.The agreements were terminated as payments were not maintained and subsequently assigned to the claimant.

 

and the claimant claims:

a) The total of the said sums being £4730.12

b) Interest persuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, but limited to one year, being £297.11

c) costs

 

Amount claimed £5027.23

Court fee £205.00

Legal Representatives costs £100

Total amount £5582.23 

 

 

######Defence######

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. The Claimant has not fully complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) having failed to disclose the requested documents on which this claim relies upon. It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

2. The claim comprises the following agreements the defendant allegedly entered into:

 

a. Shop Direct Financial Services with reference ########## and current balance of £481.84.

b. Vanquis Bank with reference ############ and current balance of £2560.91.

c. New Day Ltd with reference ###### and current balance of £1687.37.

 

The defendant does not recall with any precision the agreements referred to above and has sought further information from the claimant.

 

3. Paragraph 2 is noted although the claimant has yet to provide any evidence with regards to the alleged agreements, when the agreement were defaulted when terminated or if a default notice was ever served by the original creditors pursuant to section 87(1) of the CCA1974.

Further with regards to Assignment it is denied I was ever served with Notice of Assignment's for each f the agreements pursuant to sec 136 Law and Property Act 1925. 

 

4.On receipt of this claim I requested by way of Section 78 request x 3 pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a true copy of the credit agreements relating to the alleged Shop Direct Financial Services, Vanquis Bank, and New Day Ltd. To date the claimant has failed to comply with the requests and is therefore prevented from enforcing the above agreements pursuant to section 78 CCA1974 until such time they can comply.

 

The claimant has also failed to respond to a CPR 31.14 request for the alleged documents on which this claim relies. The claim has yet to be allocated to track and therefore my request is legally valid.

 

4. Therefore, the defendant denies owing any money to the Claimant and the claimant is put to strict proof:

 

a. Show how the Defendant has entered into an Agreement/s.

 

b. Show how the Defendant has reached the amounts claimed.

 

c. Show and evidence when valid Default Notices/Termination were issued for each agreement and dates terminated.

 

d. Evidence Notice of Assignments for each of the agreement/s

 

5. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed; having been provided with written requests for information under CPR 31.14 and to date have failed to provide any such documentation as detailed on the particulars of claim.

 

 6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...