Announcements
-
-
Tweets
-
Posts
-
Hey everyone - back off holiday now and I thought I would update you on how the conversation went the judge brought up the fact I part admitted to £2,500, I explained at the time this was because I was dealing with CST Law and this was the amount I was trying to agree to pay to close the case, I wasn't admitting to anything and since filling that out I realised I made a mistake the judge explained I could submit paperwork to the court to withdraw that part admission at a cost £200-£350. if this is worth doing I will but I wanted to seek advice here first? apologise I don't recall what the exact document was called The judge said we would have to attend court in person (in the area I live) in around 6 weeks I'm waiting on a letter from the court which should be arriving this week The claimant's solicitor wanted to request a 4-hour slot but the judge rejected that explaining this matter doesn't need to take up any more of the courts time and 2 hours will be adequate The claimant said they will be bringing 2 witnesses the judge asked if we would want mediation - we both agreed however I haven't had any communication from them as of yet but I explained I'd be happy to stop this going any further if we can come to an agreement on the sum I explained to the judge I've never been in a position like this in my life and I never gained anything financially after leaving British gas i.e. i went back to my old job on less pay where I still remain today he took his time to explain things which I didn't understand and he seemed quite reasonable, he will also be the judge when I have to attend court.
-
I'd just like to add - the HMRC rep was very sympathetic, as was the Judge, and even HMRC called it a 'scam', and said I'd done everything possible LBA, ICO, MCOL, etc, which was good. It was almost like they both could understand what's happened, but as per their job roles and the law, can't do anything to help me. There's some part of me, however, that feels like the Judge has given this extension for a formal reply to HMRC's application to strike off as she wants me to have a "fair" and "just" appeal so has given me more time to "look into those 2 cases" and "further study them to pick relevant parts", and provide further evidence as to why I believe my case should move forward. Almost like, she knows what will work in order to move it forward and the proof I need, and wants to give me time to find it... without telling me what it is... if that makes sense? I could be wrong.
-
Hi - sorry - I set an alert to update you all 12pm today, but i'll do it now. Essentially, the purpose of the hearing was a case management hearing, I believe, and in relation to HMRC's application for a strike out. Apparently, I didn't officially "argue" or "dispute" HMRC's application for a strike out (I sent emails when advised earlier in this thread, but they may not have treated them as official "disputes") and so this was a hearing for the Judge to see what was going on, be updated with the case, and decided on future directions. You'll already know, but HMRC's standing is that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction and by law needs to take the appropriate action. My argument re anything to do with a scam, or FTR, etc, isn't really a direct response to their application for strike out as their POV is that I am not disputing the fact a rebate was made incorrectly. I presume, my only argument is to further prove and clarify I had NO IDEA and gave NO AUTHORITY to FTR to claim EIS relief. I think maybe the legislation would help here... I would imagine I need to get past this strike out request, and then can dive deeper into the scam/fraud, etc, avenues. The McCumskey and Huntly cases did help me somewhat in that I predict without them the Judge would've accepted HMRC's application for strike out is this very hearing - along the same lines of Slick's posts #115, more specifically #183. The fact I brought them those cases up and said although they have differences (HMRC is well aware of these two cases - almost like they expected me to bring them up) i.e. one of them is a late appeal hearing, and the other is a discovery appeal (mine is re a final closure), they do have little-some relevance given the Judge's decisions on them and they mention EIS. In summary, I have 28 days from yesterday to draft an official reply to HMRC strike out, in which they then have 28 days to reply. A next hearing is already booked for 10 August. There was a lot talked about in the hearing so apologies if I've missed something (I've tried to remember as much as I can) - happy to clarify any questions.
-
Can't get blood out of a stone then Just ensure the bank has your current and correct address If you want to negotiate with the bank only, that's your call but do read threads here and lots of them Dx
-
The following topic may be of interest to you with regards to the impending Statutory Demand Andy
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
Our picks
-
Contacting loved ones in Ukraine
45002 posted a topic in Telecoms - mobile or fixed,
Contacting loved ones in Ukraine. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/446558-contacting-loved-ones-in-ukraine/&do=findComment&comment=5156526-
-
- 0 replies
-
-
Post in Hermes parcels scandal continues - plus Times Radio interview audio file
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
- Jenny Kleeman and Luke Jones with Times Radio Breakfast Times Radio The Times and The Sunday Times.mp3
-
-
Post in Hermes parcels scandal continues - plus Times Radio interview audio file
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
- Jenny Kleeman and Luke Jones with Times Radio Breakfast Times Radio The Times and The Sunday Times.mp3
-
-
Buy a homeless person Christmas Dinner - Social Bite
stu007 posted a topic in Homelessness,
Buy a homeless person Christmas Dinner - Social Bite. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/443900-buy-a-homeless-person-christmas-dinner-social-bite/&do=findComment&comment=5145464-
-
- 0 replies
-
-
-
Recommended Topics
Newlyn PLC chasing for PCN £513
-
Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Have we helped you ...?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now