Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Restored Limited Company recovering a debt owed.


wrecked
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 288 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear CAG,

 

Please advise on the following problem.

 

I have a friend who was very very ill since 2017. He had problems with his heart. After a number of heart attacks, he had a quadruple bypass in January 2021. (His bypass was to have taken place during 2020 but of course, it was delayed due to covid)

 

While he was waiting for the bypass operation, his company was struck off by Companies House in 2019 because he failed to send the company accounts and other documentation. He failed to send them because of his illness.

 

He made full recovery after his operation and he then restored his company as soon as he was able during 2021.  

 

Prior to his illness his company was appointed as a commission sales agent for a manufacturing company (based in UK) in 2016 . During 2017, his company won a contract for this manufacturing Company for the first part of an engineering project.  His commission was paid in full by the manufacturing company after they were paid by the end user.

 

Even through his illness and heart attacks he was able to complete the second sale for the second part of the same engineering project. As a result, the manufacturing company won the contract for the second part during 2020. The manufacturer owes his company commission from the proceeds of this second order they received from the same end user customer.

 

The manufacturer refuses to pay the commission owed to his company saying that as it had been struck off, they are no longer obligated to make the payment. Any arrangement that was made prior to the company being struck off and for that reason, is null and void.

 

Our view is that the company being struck off is irrelevant because

 

a.       It is a continuation of the same project

b.       The company has been restored.

c.       The dissolution was merely due to an administration issue with Companies House as a consequence of his illness.

 

As the company has been fully restored the debt owed by the manufacturer is still valid, they are liable and they must pay.

 

According to the guidance notes on Companies House Website

(https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/company-strike-off-dissolution-and-restoration/strike-off-dissolution-and-restoration)

 

Guidance.

Strike off, dissolution and restoration

Updated 24 March 2021

 

11.8 Once a company has been restored by the court

When a company has been restored to the register, the general effect is that a company is deemed to have continued in existence as if it had not been dissolved or struck off the register.

 

My friend is claiming the payment owed to his company. However, he may have to take legal action as I think the manufacturing company feels that they have the upper hand because his company has been struck off.  Even though it has been restored, the payment is no longer owed to the sales agent.  

 

Will my friend be able to serve a writ on the manufacturer as a last resort so he could get his money?

 

Please advise your views and comments on this situation so I can advise him and we an consider the next steps.

 

Thank you

Wrecked.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know much about this area of law but what you are saying about the continuation of a restored company makes perfect sense. I can scarcely imagine that it is any other way.

How much money are we talking about here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BankFodder,

Thank you for your reply. I feel the same way. As said in my first post above, it stated on Company House's website  :

"....deemed to have continued in existence as if it had not been dissolved or struck off the register...."

Which means the restored company is absolutely valid and can continue as normal, as if it had not been struck off. 

Value wise, it is a lot. 200K+ The project was in two parts, most of the work was done when he initially started in 2016 when he was well. The first order was in 2017. He received his commission payment. This second requirement took place in 2019  after he had his second or third heart attack. And thats the reason why he was completely off the grid and unable to submit papers to CH.

He did invest a substantial amount of his own money over the years whilst the project had been ongoing. But now the manufacturer is refusing to pay. This is why my friend has been absolutely worried sick.  He could easily lose his house over it. 

He is thinking that his only course of action is to serve a writ on the manufacturer and as a result he will have to meet the various costs required to proceed with this action. And that is why he asked my opinion. 

Like you, I was not sure as his company had been struck off. Thats why I reached out to CAG. 

My advice to him has been to try his hardest to try and impress on the manufacturer to pay without having to go to court. Of course, they are not taking his calls so he is having to email and write letters. He's now tearing his hair out and all I can do at the moment is to try and help him stay calm.  

I do not know what others in CAG think about this problem.

All the best

Wrecked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I think you need to gather evidence before taking any action to back up your friend going forward if they need to take this further especially with the amount of money involved.

 

Make sure and download anything relating to the company from Companies House also do the same via the London Gazette  which is where notice are placed about companies including strike off/restoration of a company.

 

You should have added the full quote from the link you provided as it states:

 

I quote:

Quote

11.8 Once a company has been restored by the court

 

When a company has been restored to the register, the general effect is that a company is deemed to have continued in existence as if it had not been dissolved or struck off the register.

 

The Court may give directions or make provision to put the company and all other persons in the same position as they were before the company was dissolved and struck off. A notice will also be placed in the relevant Gazette.

 

 

London Gazette link: 

 

 

On the above link look at the left side and either enter the Company Name or click Company Number and enter it and do a search for the company.

 

Have a good look at the Companies 'Time Line' you should be able to download the PDFs showing different notices about the company also make sure and bookmark/save the website links.

 

With Companies House and the phrase you mention I am of the same opinion as Bankfodder

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI

 

Thank you STU - yes, of course I will check and go through everything as you advised.

I asked him not to do anything. A few more days will not make any difference. 

I told him I wanted to seek the opinion from CAG

 

Thank you

All the best

W.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the company has been restored then it can pursue its claim for payment.  see s1032 Companies Act 2006:

 

Quote

 

1032Effect of court order for restoration to the register

(1)The general effect of an order by the court for restoration to the register is that the company is deemed to have continued in existence as if it had not been dissolved or struck off the register.

 

 

WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK

An Act to reform company law and restate the greater part of the enactments relating to companies; to make other provision relating to companies and other forms of business organisation; to make provision...

 

This is subject to any defence the debtor may have, and also to any possible limitation of actions (this seems unlikely of the liability to pay arose in 2020).

 

In my last post I said "This is subject to any defence the debtor may have". The contract should be checked to see whether the debtor may have the right to argue that the fact of dissolution becomes a bar to payment, notwithstanding the subsequent restoration of the company to the register.

 

I guess there is no chance that the debtor paid the Crown, the debt being bona vacantia i.e. 'orphan' asset while the company was dissolved. If it did, then the debtor has discharged the debt, but it may be possible to recover payment from the Crown.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 

 

Thank you very much indeed Mantis . 

I really really appreciate your advice. 

He had high blood pressure Thursday so I left it, but told him I had good news from CAG and arranged to meet up with him on Sunday to go through this matter. 

 

Thank you again 

 

Have a good weekend 

Warm Regards 

W.

Edited by wrecked
Spelling errors
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Dear All,

 

Please accept my apologies for being silent for the last couple of months. I am afraid I had a heart attack at the end of January and ended up having a triple heart bypass. I am doing well now - just taking it easy. !!

 

My friend was extremely grateful for your comments and advice which he followed. He consulted a dynamic solicitor and is chasing this debt quite vigorously. He advised me that he employed a credit controller to chase the debtor. I will get back and update you on the progress. 

 

Thank you CAG - again.

 

Have a great weekend.

Wrecked.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Mantis .. so far so good ...as they say.

He is away at the moment and I will have a detailed talk with him on his return next week.

I will update if there's anything new.

 

Best/Wrecked

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Dear CAG

Firstly, thank you to HB and dx for re-opening the case.

 

So, we spent the last three months trying to reach a solution with the debtor because he sent a without prejudice email to my friend declaring that he “wanted to meet, discuss the whole thing and pay something”.  But, the meeting never took place because my friend asked for an agenda, a settement figure  and then advised the debtor that my friend wanted me to accompany him to the meeting. The debtor stressed he wanted a one-to-one meeting only and would not disclose anything else. After that, we heard nothing more from him.

I believe we have no other choice but to go through the courts to recover the debt. My friend does not want to use his solicitor as the fees are prohibitive. He will pursue the case himself. He asked me to help him even though I advised him I was neither qualified nor knowledgeable enough.

We sent the debtor reminders for payment and formal letters requesting payment. There were no replies. Finally, at the beginning of this month, we sent a letter summarising the entire situation, highlighting on the agreement, stressing that the debtor had agreed to pay, reminding the debtor that he had paid for the first part of the work and this outstanding amount was owed for the second part as it was not only common knowledge in the industry but was confirmed by the end user that the project was to be implemented in two stages. 

My plan is to try and finish this case swiftly.  We want to apply for summary judgment on the basis that the debtor has no defence. Prior to commencement of the second project my friend obtained a cofirmation from the debtor that the debtor would continue to work with my friend as before, in the first project.  The debtor had not honoured the written agreement nor this additional agreement so, we want to serve the writ based on "Breach of Contract".

I believe I have built up the file accordingly and sufficiently over the last three months. 

But, I really need CAG to help me. Please advise me regarding:

a) the Pre-action Protocol

b) Your thoughts on us applying for Summary Judgment,

c) Specific court forms I need for submitting a Summary Judgment application

d) The correct interest rate to apply 

e) Please advise on anything else I may have missed out 

f) My understanding is we cannot serve this writ through MCOL so we need to serve the writ through a high court. I assume I need to serve the writ through a high court local to the debtor's company registered office address. 

g) Do I need to give " a title " to the writ or may I simply state

"Application for Summary Judgement  following a Breach of Agreement"

 

Thank you very much indeed for your help

Warm regards

 

 

Edited by wrecked
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

urm...

dont you have to get a court judgement FIRST and then await atleast 33 days before you can go for SJ?

best bet might be to raise the court claim and when he looses send in HCEO to serve the writ ?

not my best subject, but is this is a B2B debt? and it's sum...£200K?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

£200k? That’d be in the multi-track track of the County Court, and might even get transferred to the High Court.

 

I’d STRONGLY advise using a solicitor. Could a no-win, no-fee arrangement be on option for your friend?.

I’m suggesting this as although they may have a strong case, it’d be a shame to loose on some administrative point, and the defendant could then ask for significant costs!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi    dx, BazzaS

Thank you for your messages. They are greatly appreciated.

Hi dx - yes B2B and >200K and yes based on my research we need a court judgement FIRST and then go for SJ?

Hi BazzaS  - ATM, We are preparing all the relevant papers for Pre-action Protocol and Claim to keep the costs down. When all paperwork is ready, we will then find a Solicitor. We are preparing the clam and completing the N1 form.

Please will some one clarify to me - do I issue the writ through Northampton County Court (NCC) or do I serve the Claim and N1 form direct to the debtor and forward a copy to NCC.  My experience is limited to MoneyClaim On Line.

 Thank you/W

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure why you think SJ is necessary. if you win this is B2B you send in HCEO's...they can force entry and seize any business assets on a business property.. end of.

dont think MCOL is your route nor Salford as it's B2B and + £200k..not my bag sadly...as @BazzaS says go to a NWNF sols. he will deal. though they will take a % of the final sum.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...