Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It isnt a great thing to have to worry about all these things. I am sure someone on this site will offer some great advice.   Priority debts need to be sorted first; Rent/Mortgage, Council Tax, Utility   - Dont quote me as I do not know the legal points around this; but Overdrafts, catalouge, card debts are not priority. I would sit down and work out exactly what your priority debts and living costs are, deduct from your income. Look at all your cards, loans overdrafts etc, list them all, starting from the highest interest charging ones, think what and which ones to work out a realistic monthly payment, dont overpay what you cant afford.  I would consider not using the cards etc, as you will be adding to your debt and problems. I would contact someone Like Stepchange or Citizens advice, they will offer you some very good advice and ways of contacting your companies you have debt with. Dont be afraid of your debt companies, write to the fully explaining situation and what you can realistically offer, do not be preasurised into paying more than you can I personally prefer contact by post or e mail rather than telephone. Ive no idea what Factor, Monzo is, but may well fall in line with what Ive said.   Keep a note in a diary of every call you made or who contacted you, ask for names, keep and copy all letters to and from as this may be helpfull further down the line for record keeping.   Do not ignore contact as this just adds more stress for you and the problem wont go away.   Make sure you make your affordable monthly payments, every month, even if they say we wont accept it, its to low.    As you have a lot of stress going on, I would certainly contact someone like Stepchange or Citizens advice,    Good luck
    • Hy. Caring for family adult learning disability; full time, currently unpaid from work, unpaid carer - receive weekly carers allowance This is what I have searched on so far; - can only receive from employment £132 a week, after Tax, NI, deductions in all about £201.00 a week, but this is taxable and needs to be entered on tax submission, but if less than personal allowance then no tax may be paid? - I believe NI is paid as long as you get the carers allowance, although gap between break in employment and start of carers allowance may not be? -Should employment end due to company not happy in change of hrs and I have to leave, then only the carers allowance would for be the income, If UC is applied for would this allowance be deducted from what UC give or the person I cared for be affected - Savings may affect if you get UC or not - Certainly cant be available for looking for work as full time carer   anyone have any points, help or advice on this issue please
    • hy, In a nutshell; - current contract  work part time Mon to Fri 24 hrs - Unpaid year off break to become family member full time carer - Need to either go back to work at end of next month, start of July or leave - Application for Transfer was turned down   - Letter to go in this week with a application form to request change of contract, hrs, days so that I can look after family member - change requested will be work mon, tues, wed but not more than 13.5hrs or 14, then breaks deducted to stay within legal earnings limit as carers allowance is recieved - it is not possible to work thur, fri sat, sun due to care needs and travelling for adult disabled family member   ok; Ive done a bit of digging, I can send application  for reduction of the hrs and contract which i think the govt said I can legally do. Doesnt mean the company has to be bound legally by it. It may be that it isnt suitible and there for ask me to resign. Or they may agree! Or terminate my employment. But as I am a full time family carer for a family member within the same household, I should have a good case to argue.    Does anyone have any further knowledge or experince of this to advice me, what legal or other rights, but if I quit or asked to quit, would claiming benefits as such be suspended for quiting a job, thanks    
    • I’m looking for some guidance please. I’ve been reading up but am stuck on what I should do and going round in circles now.   Trying to manage my own DMP and making a mess of it I think.   My income is £1015 per month Essential outgoings: factor fee £93 pet insurance £81 (giant breed so quite costly) TV licence £13.37 Groceries for 3 adults and giant breed dog £309 Council Tax £111 Internet £36 Electric £59 No water/gas/car Public transport £30 Gifts £15 Mobiles £6 Debt to family £42 Saving £0 Leftover £220 (for creditors) Actual Original Total Due to Creditors £600 (pro rata started) So I’ve started negotiating pro rata payments while still trying to keep credit cards going for future emergencies (they are maxed now but if I can pay them down it releases credit for me to have as a back Up)   It’s all getting worse, I’m struggling, I have depression, my wife has depression and is unwell. Interest on 3 cards is over £100 so not really paying anything off.   I’ve negotiated pro rata on some and I think I’ve gone in too high because I’m really struggling with it, I forgot that when they ask for income expenses they don’t take into account that the factor bill is 3 monthly and therefore I need £279 by May 31st and not £93 as budgeted so already in trouble for month 2. Partner debts: Starling bank overdraft: £400, 2019. Pro rata £14 arrangement to pay, no default.   Tesco Credit Card: £100  started 1/12/2019; defaulted 7/10/20 £5 mth   Virgin Credit Card: £2700 started 14/5/18; defaulted 30/3/21 £5 mth   Marks and Spencer Credit Card: £850 started 18/10/19; defaulted 13/1/21 £5 mth   Nationwide Credit Card: £1500 started 30/4/19; defaulted 28/12/20 £5 mth   Barclaycard CC: £1400 (PRA group purchased it) started 25/8/18; defaulted 16/7/20 £5 mth.    Aqua Credit Card: £3900 (now with Cabot Financial) started 3/12/18;  defaulted 12/11/20 £5mth   Aqua Loan: £1700 (now with Link Financial) started 28/9/19; defaulted 2/2/2021 £5 mth   My Debts:   Monzo Loan:  £1900 October 2021 – permanent pro rata £39 agreed, not defaulted    Likely Loans: £1500 December 2021 – temp £14 pro rata, not defaulted    Monzo overdraft: varies up to £750  - temp £10 pro rata   Monzo Flex: £900 December 2021 – temp £11 pro rata   Fluid Credit Card: £1500 July 2021 (on a holiday until August) £0    Capital One Credit Card: £700 £40 mth (up to date)   Amazon Credit card: £2450 November 2021 £75 mth (up to date)   Next: £56 December 2021,  £5 mth (up to date)   My dilemma is I can’t pay the factor bill and have maxed my cards.   I wonder about going on a payment holiday with Amazon and Capital One and then negotiate pro rata using a part of the £220 left for creditors in time, so keeping the pro rata proportional.   In August my Fluid holiday ends and they want £80.   I’m not getting hassled by any creditors and prefer an option that keeps it that way but last night seriously thought should I stop paying all of some of them.   Thanks  Stuckfast    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

Cabot claimform - old Lloyds credit card debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 112 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My friend is a user of this group and advised I reach out for help. They have given me some limited knowledge, but I would really appreciate someone give me some quick direction.

 

Essentially I had a credit card worth £6000. My original agreement was for a lloyds credit card in 2005 and stopped paying in 2008 when my business fell in the recession.

 

Between 11/12/12 - 5/9/17 i paid cabot financial £10 pm. Eventually i stopped paying them and they have been harassing me. My friend advised i just ignore.

 

I received letters dated 19 nov 2021 i thought they were just usual harassing circulars.

 

Today I received a court claim letter court dated 30/12/21.

 

There was no title written Pre-action-protocol on the letter dated 19 nov 2021, seemed very misleading to me, i thought they had to do that and had to make this clear?

 

However I accept responsibility that this was my fault, i only told my friend it was one page i received, i got confused. i never replied, i thought it was more junk from them. Now i don’t know what to do.

 

i’m aware i need to submit a defence on the money claims site, but i’m not sure what to write? And what else to do. Believe i only have 28 days to submit something online.

 

Shall i still reply to the PAP now?

 

Should i be requesting my CCA?

 

i have read a bit and got and idea of what to do, im just not sure in what order. if someone can help me please? Do i have any chance here or shall i try and borrow some money and try to settle?

 

i have attached the pack received from the 19th nov 2021 and then a separate pdf of court letters dated 30 dec 2021. i hope i have redacted correctly.

 

Thank you in advance

Letters before court1-compressed.pdf

court letters1.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • mikanosuk11 changed the title to Lloyds card - Cabot court letters help

 

please complete the above

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Cabot claimform - old Lloyds credit card debt
Posted (edited)

Name of the Claimant ? Cabot Financial (uk) Limited

 

Date of issue –  30/12/21

 

Date for service - 17/1/22

 

date to submit defence - 31/1/22

 

Particulars of Claim

What is the claim for –

1. By an agreement between Lloyds TSB and the defendant on or around 24/ 01/ 2005 ref xxxxxx Lloyds TSB agreed to issue the defendant with a credit card.

 

2.The defendant failed to make the minimum payments due.

 

3.The agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice.

 

4.The agreement was assigned to the claimant.

 

The claimant therefore claims 1.5546.36

2. costs

 

What is the total value of the claim? £6101.36
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes But it was not titled as such. 

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No 

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Yes 

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? No 

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? I haven’t checked 

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to debt purchaser 

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I cant remember, I believe so
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I cant remember, I believe so
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? I don’t know

Why did you cease payments? Couldn’t pay anymore 

 

What was the date of your last payment? 7/9/17
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No 

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

 

 

Thank you!

 

i have completed CPR and CCA requests and will post immediately.

 

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
Go to HMRC's login page.
Click the GREEN sign in button.
Click “Create sign in details”
Enter your email address where asked.
You will now be emailed a confirmation code. ...
You will now be issued with a User ID for your government gateway account.
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 then log in to the MCOL Website
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
[BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ]
click thru to the end
confirm and exit MCOL.
..
get a CCA Request running to the claimant

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/

..

Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed

.

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
...
.[use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt]
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/

.

on BOTH type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork 
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

..............


 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much

 

We have just completed AOS correctly:

A claim was issued against you on 30/12/2021

Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 06/01/2022 at 04:45:11

 

My friend has done the CCA and CPR 31.14 and we will post tomorrow

i will make a note of the defence date cut off

i will come back here as soon as i hear anything, i didnt keep any letters so far

We are having a look for similar cases here to find a defence because im not sure what to put

 

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont worry about not kept stuff

dont worry about nothing for defence back by then.

 

use our enhanced google searc box.

 

claimform card

 

loads of threads here

twill be our std generic holding/no paperwork defence which is almost in every like thread.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your help

 

i haven't heard back as of yet but as you suggest, i wont wait, we will have a look around and make sure i submit the defence before 31st

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop it up here 1st

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

acknowledgement of service - you've done that already 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to bother but is there a specific way of searching for such things? i am just searching through everything inside Debt Collection Agencies is that correct?

 

i found these threads, am i on the right lines and are these enough of an outline to go off of? And i should just personalise this to my cicumstances?

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/443269-cabotmortimer-claimform-old-new-day-aqua-card-debt/#comment-5146014

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/432443-cabotmortimer-claimform-old-newday-marbles-credit-card-debt/#comment-5098232

 

And i found a thread with all of these posted inside

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/156156-help-mum-being-taken.html#post1665130

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dca-legal-successes/126111-cl-finance-ltd-recieved-4.html#post1350484

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/121774-lloyds-tsb-credit-card-5.html#post1461198

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/144007-help-amex-no-cca-3.html#post1549360

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/160703-urgent-help-needed-robinson.html#post1721582

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/161469-1st-credit-animal-2.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/157973-welcome-fianance-court-case-4.html#post1704890

 

also

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/404591-backdoor-pra-ccj-old-lloyds-credit-card-debt-sent-to-pulled-down-house-site/page/2/#comments

 

And 

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/212949-urgent-help-needed-with-defense-weightmansequidebt/#comment-2583281

 

And

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/420714-lowell-claim-form-old-cat-debt-claim-discontinued/#comment-5044541

 

Thank you very much

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep no paperwork/holding defence

 

use our enhanced google search box

 

claimform card

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much DX100UK, that helped a lot.

 

POC

 

1. By an agreement between Lloyds TSB and the defendant on or around 24/ 01/ 2005 ref xxxxxx Lloyds TSB agreed to issue the defendant with a credit card.

 

2.The defendant failed to make the minimum payments due.

 

3.The agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice.

 

4.The agreement was assigned to the claimant.

 

The claimant therefore claims 1.5546.36

2. costs

 

DEFENCE

 

1.     The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 

  

2.     Paragraph 1 is noted. It is accepted I have in the past had agreements with Lloyds TSB. I do not recall the precise details or agreement nor the claimant either, having failed to provide an agreement/account number within its particulars of claim and have therefore sought verification from the claimant.

 

3.     Paragraph 2 is noted but until such time the claimant can clarify the agreement account number any breach has yet to be proven.   

 

4.     I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served by either the Claimant or Lloyds TSB pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

5. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any Notice of default served.

 

6.     It is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of the Agreement/Assignment/Default notice or Termination requested by CPR 31. 14.

  

Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement ; and

b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

c) Show or evidence a Default Notice /Notice of Sums in Arrears,

d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

7.     As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

8.     On the 5th of January 2022 I requested to The Claimants Solicitors, Mortimer Clarke by way of a CPR 31.14 copies of the documents referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for. Mortimer Clarke have failed to fulfil my CPR 31:14 request.

 

9.     On the 5th of January 2022 I made a section 78 legal request to the claimant for a copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement. The claimant has as of 27/01/22 failed to comply.

 

10.  By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

End.

___________________________________

 

I did find this in some defences, but I’m not sure if this ‘PAP’ failed to comply:

'The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC'

 

I read this 3. And it seems they did, so I should leave out?

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/pdf/protocols/debt-pap.pdf

 

Edited by dx100uk
poc added
Link to post
Share on other sites

i've inserted their poc in your above post for easy ref.

 

2.+ 3.... they do state an a/c number in their poc

 

can you scan up what you think might be their PAPLOC only the front page(s) we dont need the full reply pack with the I&C sheet and questionaire, however confirm those were  sent 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is exactly what i got in the post, what i attached in the first post. i don't have any other letters from them. Sadly i never kept what they previously posted me because i thought they were just nuisance letters. However they were 1 page letters 'call us now' type of things. Nothing like this.

 

This is all i ever had from them before this letter/pack 19th November, claim 30 December. It didn't actually say Pre Action Protocol anywhere but i'm not sure if it should.

 

Subsequently i have had a response from Mortlake yesterday saying they have passed on my requests to the claimant blah blah. No other news from the claimant.

 

So i shall remove '/account number' from the defence in that case.

 

Thank you

Letters before court1-compressed (2).pdf

Edited by mikanosuk11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats a letter of claim reply pack.. So you did get one. Though yes i agree no letter headed letter of claim.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Ok so i will submit the above defence minus account reference section tonight, unless any objections/changes?

 

DEFENCE

 

1.     The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 

  

2.     Paragraph 1 is noted. It is accepted I have in the past had agreements with Lloyds TSB. I do not recall the precise details or agreement nor the claimant either, having failed to provide an agreement within its particulars of claim and have therefore sought verification from the claimant.

 

3.     Paragraph 2 is noted but until such time the claimant can clarify the agreement account number any breach has yet to be proven.   

 

4.     I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served by either the Claimant or Lloyds TSB pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

5. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any Notice of default served.

 

6.     It is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of the Agreement/Assignment/Default notice or Termination requested by CPR 31. 14.

  

Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement ; and

b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

c) Show or evidence a Default Notice /Notice of Sums in Arrears,

d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

7.     As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

8.     On the 5th of January 2022 I requested to The Claimants Solicitors, Mortimer Clarke by way of a CPR 31.14 copies of the documents referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for. Mortimer Clarke have failed to fulfil my CPR 31:14 request.

 

9.     On the 5th of January 2022 I made a section 78 legal request to the claimant for a copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement. The claimant has as of 27/01/22 failed to comply.

 

10.  By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks ok to me

past 4pm anyway and its not due till/by 4pm monday 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

2.     Paragraph 1 is noted. It is accepted I have in the past had agreements with Lloyds TSB. I do not recall the precise details or agreement nor the claimant either, having failed to provide an agreement within its particulars of claim and have therefore sought verification from the claimant.

 

3.     Paragraph 2 is noted but until such time the claimant can clarify the agreement account number any breach has yet to be proven.   

 

They have or you have provided the agreement number within the particulars ?

 

Andy.

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey andy good spot...

the typed poc isnt the same as the POC on the actual claimform scan in post 1 (urm why do we repeatedly ask for it exactly in the sticky) 

their is no number!!

 

put those lines back..:pound:

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the claim form upload

 

1. By an agreement between Lloyds TSB and the defendant on or around 24/ 01/ 2005 Lloyds TSB agreed to issue the defendant with a credit card.

 

From the sticky completed by Mikanosuk

 

What is the claim for –

1. By an agreement between Lloyds TSB and the defendant on or around 24/ 01/ 2005 (  ref xxxxxx  this is not on the claim I thought I would add it to help the claimants claim ) Lloyds TSB agreed to issue the defendant with a credit card.

 

:roll:

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thank you

 

On the 4th page of the pap, they have written the card number and titled it agreement number i have just noticed it yes. But i removed that wording from point 2

 

i noticed point 3, so shall i change to:

3.     Paragraph 2 is noted but until such time the claimant can clarify the agreement if any breach has yet to be proven.   

 

or just remove this point 3 as below i have mentioned my request for the agreement?

 

i dont understand about the lines and the poc. but i wrote it exactly as it was in the form in red?

 

Yes i see they have not put what the claim is for, so should i then actually put back about the account number in points 2 and 3?

 

Sorry ive got a bit confused now

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes.

 

the simple answer is that in the court claim poc, they have not stated an A/C number when they should, thus they could rock up later with any old agreement/paperwork as long as its a card aagreement and say its correct as long as it has all the other criteria.

 

sorry my bad

put those lines back...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to apologise! I am extremely grateful for both your help

 

Gosh very good attention to detail going on here :)

 

Great thank you, i will put them back as below

 

Good evening to you

 

DEFENCE

 

1.     The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 

  

2.     Paragraph 1 is noted. It is accepted I have in the past had agreements with Lloyds TSB. I do not recall the precise details or agreement nor the claimant either, having failed to provide an agreement/account number within its particulars of claim and have therefore sought verification from the claimant.

 

3.     Paragraph 2 is noted but until such time the claimant can clarify the agreement account number any breach has yet to be proven.   

 

4.     I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served by either the Claimant or Lloyds TSB pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

5. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any Notice of default served.

 

6.     It is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of the Agreement/Assignment/Default notice or Termination requested by CPR 31. 14.

  

Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement ; and

b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

c) Show or evidence a Default Notice /Notice of Sums in Arrears,

d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

7.     As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

8.     On the 5th of January 2022 I requested to The Claimants Solicitors, Mortimer Clarke by way of a CPR 31.14 copies of the documents referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for. Mortimer Clarke have failed to fulfil my CPR 31:14 request.

 

9.     On the 5th of January 2022 I made a section 78 legal request to the claimant for a copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement. The claimant has as of 27/01/22 failed to comply.

 

10.  By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...