Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Thesis SLC Loan - now Link saying i've defaulted


Loan stress
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 841 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received notice of arrears letters from Thesis regarding my student loans

 

I contacted them as the account is in deferment accepted by SLC, they informed me they cancelled the deferment and have defaulted my account and passed this to Link Outsourcing who are now demanding £8660 for a 25 year old debt that I have never earned above threshold to make any payments.

 

I have e-mailed Link as I am not prepared to talk to them over the phone, Thesis were bad enough! To tell them I dispute this and to find out what my options are as I can not afford this debt.

 

I have tried to research this as they are saying any arrears on the account mean the loan is not wiped after the 25year period and as I missed deferring for 4 years of the loan period I now owe this huge debt.

 

Any advice would be hugely appreciated as to what my next steps should be as I am afraid they will take me to court.

 

 

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

So what years did you take out student loans ?

 

Have you always deferred since you graduated ?

 

If you did not defer for a period, why did you not defer ?

 

Did you get notice from SLC that they sold the loan debts ?  If so when did this happen and who bought the debt ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes how many years did you miss deferring please?

 

thesis are LINK in sheeps clothing.

 

NEVER EVER believe a word they say and most certainly do not speak on the phone EVER well done

pers i wouldn't use email either

 

get the true data and comeback to us please

for now go radio silent.

 

pop up on the SLC portal on their website, log in, and get the TRUTH about what has actually happened.

 

they wont do court thesis loans never do, but they will most certainly try and scam you into paying.

the arrears are most probably bogus data anyway simple used as an excuse to you thinking you can't now write them off as 25yrs have expired.

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Thesis SLC Loan - now Link saying i've defaulted

Hi

There are 4 student loans altogether 95,96,97 and 1998.

 

I have evidence of deferments from 1998 through to 2016; when I went through a messy divorce and multiple house moves.  Thesis contacted me at my new address, I spoke to them and set up a deferment for 2020- 2021, then another for 2021-2022 (to expire 14th March) with SLC. I have never paid anything.

 

I received a letter from Thesis 27/10/2021 serving a default notice under section 87(1) of the consumer credit act, I spoke to them and that’s when they told me they had cancelled my deferment and arrears were accruing for missed payments. I called them and they said I had 3 months to pay the £8000+ which I said I couldn’t pay.

 

They said they would file the default and I had to wait for the debt collectors to be in touch, hence this request for help/advice.

 

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh god so you have spoken on the phone several times to thesis/link (same lot differing desks nearer the bog) ......

well you now know they LIE and will do so to continue their tissue of lies to extort money out of you.

 

now, you state you were deferring to SLC earlier, then you state above thesis. 

which was it please? and to whom for what years...

 

but be safe to know thesis/link cannot arbitrarily just cancel a deferment. Because they later discover you missed a few but they didn't check back then.

 

pers i'd simply ignore them.

there is seriously little they can do to you.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont and should not have been using thesis deferment packs.

 

use the old slc one thats in this forum, but thats immaterial now.

 

have you in writing like by email stated to. Link etc that you did not defer for these 4 yrs, and they are not stating they are chasing arrears from that period too? 

 

they are only chasing arrears created by their recent deferment cancellation?

 

Please Just remember a dca is not a BAILIFF

and have

ZERO legal powers on ANY debt...no matter what its type.

 

dont complain pointless.

 

it is unusual for all loans to be sold to thesis/honours. Are you sure thesis were sold all of them?

 

DX

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The deferment letter I have received is from SLC stating Thesis servicing administers the account. The deferment period is from 15thMarch 2021 - 14th March 2022 and lists all 4 of the loans years 1993, 1994, 1995 and 1996 , (apologies I stated a year older in my previous message) 

 

the letter states the account will continue to accrue interest during the deferment period, any direct debits will be suspended ( I don’t have any set up)

 

it also states I can make voluntary repayments to the loan accounts at any time by contacting the relevant loan administrator.

 

Thesis were appointed to the accounts on 1st October 2008.

 

Thesis default letter was chasing total arrears of £4631.69 and Link are chasing outstanding balance under all agreements including arrears, default interest and unpaid default sums total of £8638.84

 

I have another letter dated 14th November 2021 stating arrears were £3622.93 on 16th May 2021 and on 14th November they are £4631.69 with no understanding of how these arrears are made up. The statements only show the monthly interest of around £15

 

I really do not understand the figures they are showing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sort of making more sense now.

 

SLC still hold the overall administration role.

 

pers i would totally ignore the other interlopers even if they were sold the loans in 2008.

 

you'll see lots of threads in the SLC forum i've moved you too. bottom line ignore.

 

if you want to WRITE to anyone then do so to SLC directly, do not mention anything about the interlopers stating arrears etc, simply enquire as the loans have reached 25yrs, should they not now be written off? 

 

lets see what they say.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...