Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Directions Hearing Leeds


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the replies, funnily enough i've just had a missed call from barclays, could be that they've realised my hubbies wage is no longer going in or it could be something more interesting, customer services couldnt tell me who's phoned and why, the message said they'll try again later. fingers crossed xx i'll keep you posted.

Jenny;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 314
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, Still no word from barclays....has anyone started their pack for the hearing yet? If so can you let me know what to put together???

 

thanks in advance

 

Jenny:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Have you all seen bankfodders message saying that with the multitrack claims the litigate in person can claim costs @ 9.25per hour (cpr 48) am i right in thinking if barclays are settling we can claim this too?

Jenny:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, My list only goes up to 35 and a few of those have settled, I didnt know they could keep adding to the list..but its a hearing for bank charges so they probably are aware that most of us will not get to court.

Stansfield, how many on your list have settled now?

 

Jenny:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget this is a Directions Hearing so my guess is they are going to be considering how to deal with this type of claim generally, so they can keep adding to the list. I don't know that they will necessarily deal with the claims themselves on the day, although you need to be prepared for that just in case the banks don't all settle. (I know it's unlikely).

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW

 

Although not mercantile court, my local cc has been hearing multiple bank claims (sorry i meant at AQ/Directions hearings) in the full knowledge that the banks are likely to settle prior to the hearing date.

 

So it seems to me that although it seems to have taken time the courts are resolving the bank problem in their own ways, mercantile being one, striking the defence out is another, ordering standard disclosure, and maybe others.

 

So for all those in the mercantile court, hang in there and keep waiting, its the banks turn to sweat now.

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I am trying to fill in my case management sheet but i dont understand most of it.

The basics i can do, but i dont understand what "advocates for trial" is or all the section about disclosure. Also is there anything i should put as the substance of the case. I'm getting more worried about this and do not want to fail near the last hurdle...sorry in advance if this is a really simple thing...but i am really not sure about the sheet.:confused:

 

Jenny:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can add one more to the settled list. My claim against IKANO was settled last month.

Suppose I should let the court know.... :)

Going to do my CMC/court bundle at end of the month. No point in doing it any sooner since could be a waste of time. Have tax return to do before then anyway :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess the list is extending; I'm number 50 on it, and everyone above is on my list too. Do we have any idea how many times there have been attempts to go Mercantile court, only to have all the cases settle before then? On my list of 50 cases, 2 are already listed as settled. The accompanying letter acknowledges that "some of these cases may have recently been settled and if yours is one it would be appreciated if you could write and confirm this".

Is there any point in sorting out this CMI sheet, or should I expect a settlement offer well before needing to?

 

Regards,

 

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stansfield,

I'm glad I'm not the only one confused by the sheet...far too technical for me!!! I'd give the court a ring if i were you, they had told me about the hearing before i'd got the official letter.

 

Good Luck

 

Jenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jonm.. It says in the letter to send the sheet at least 7 days before the hearing, so it would have to go in the next few weeks, I am trying to put mine together just incase, but i am hoping I wont need to rely on it. They could let it go to court, i want to be prepared if they do.

 

Jenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK J.barton that PDF document you posted up for CMC has me a tad anxious.

Are there any peeps out there that have compiled all this stuff and put it into plain english?

i'm sure we'd all be very grateful.

Its the middle sections especialyy Disclosure that are double speak.

Any templates or copies of previous submissions available?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I agree CrispDust, we need help here, I was'nt sure if i was me, i'm "glad" were all stuck.lol.

If anyone can help with this, weve got less than 2 weeks to get this in.

Thanks in advanceXX:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

 

Jenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a letter last week saying we were transferred to Mercantile Leeds.Rang court today and they said our case v Yorks bank will be heard by judge Kay on the 7/2/02 and he will be hearing the cases one after the other on this date. they said some letters giving date of hearing are still to be sent out.

;) If this helps please click the scales bottom left
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I found a completed cmsheet on the thread in this group by Haydn who's cmc was 13th Oct...I hope its ok to use it...We can amend it to fit our individual cases but hopefully this is the right one..please say if it is'nt!!LOL

 

Jenny

 

 

 

Case Management Information Sheet

Before His Honour Judge Havelock-Allan QC

 

 

 

 

 

Part Filing: Claimants

Solicitors Acting: Claimants in Person

Date

 

 

Substance of case.

1. The Claimant seeks repayment of unfair & unlawful bank charges and interest.

Parties

2. Yes

3. No, although Taunton County Court may link other claims.

Statements of Case

4. No

5. Yes. We believe CPR 18 may only become necessary if the Court directs other than to a Small Claim. However, the Defendant has insisted the Claimant complies with the Defendants CPR Part 18, the Claimant therefore seeks the Court to order full disclosure and breakdown of the administrative cost incurred in applying the said charges.

Disclosure

6. Within 7 days of being requested by the Court.

7. No

8. Yes: List of charges made to claimants accounts and in respect of every charge, a breakdown specifying the amount of actual cost to the defendant and the amount of profit added, resulting in the total charge made to the claimant in each and every charge.

9. Yes:

10. (i) Within 7 days of Courts directions

(ii) Within 7 days of Courts directions

Admissions

11. No

Preliminary issues

12. No

 

Witnesses of fact

13. One

14. Claimant

15. Claimant

16. Within 7 days of Courts directions

17. No

 

Expert Evidence

18. No

19. No

20. No

21. None

22. N/A

23. No

24. None

25. N/A

Trial

26. 1 hour

27. Within 4 weeks of Case Management Conference

28. Bristol County Court

29. No

A.D.R.

30. No

31. No. The banks have so far refused to attend hearings being content to take

the full period of the process before settling at the last minute.

32.No

33.No

Other applications

34 None.

 

Costs

35. Claimant in Person costs £9.25 per hour 18 hours research & preparation £166.50

plus £16.00 sundries expense.

36. Attendance in Bristol for Case Management and subsequent hearing total 200 miles

at standard mileage and car park rate. Further costs say 4 hours at hearings plus 4

hours travelling. Plus 10 hours additional research and preparation. Plus £4.00

sundry expense.

 

 

 

Signed Claimant

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...