Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barker Stonehouse/V12 retail finance. altering signed credit agreement


marke32
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 822 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone 

 

We've bought a sofa and bed two months ago and paid £750 deposit. We've just signed the credit agreement and returned it, after going through the figures with their sales office and have them in writing. 

 

We have just had a call now saying they've made a mistake and they want to change the agreement. 

 

Can they do that? 

Marke32

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone 

 

We've bought a sofa and bed two months ago and paid £750 deposit. We've just signed the credit agreement and returned it, after going through the figures with their sales office and have them in writing. 

 

We have just had a call now saying they've made a mistake and they want to change the agreement. 

 

I have read the agreement and there is nothing that says they have the right to alter or amend 

 

Can they do that? 

Marke32

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they say what part they wanted to change ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the part where we have to pay more money. They've basically worked out the finance wrong, despite going over it with us. Now we've signed the agreement they want to change it so it cost us more 

Marke32

Link to post
Share on other sites

who''s the company and whose the finance with, actually? you might find they are not the same lot, but a large bank/finance house etc in the small print anyway.

 

i would like to think as you've signed it and so have they its now binding, just think if you wanted to change anything like the amount paid £pcm, would they allow you....i bet not!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company is Barker Stonehouse and the finance is V12 retail finance. 

 

We have an email saying the finance agreement has been signed by both parties and is complete. 

 

Barker Stonehouse are now saying they made an error and calculated it wrong so we have to sign a new credit agreement. 

Marke32

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone 

 

Sorry if this is a bit long winded 

My partner and I purchased a sofa and bed from Barker & Stonehouse. We paid a deposit and signed the invoice. However we didn't sign the credit agreement until 2 wks before delivery. 

 

When they sent the credit agreement through my partner questioned it 3 times and they said it was correct so it was signed by both partied. 

 

Then a wk later they phoned and said they've made a mistake and were changing it. We questioned if they could do this as its legally binding. They said it was it their terms and conditions that they could change it before delivery. Basically if we didn't sign it we wouldn't receive our goods. This was just before Xmas and we'd moved into a new build with no furniture. 

 

Subsequently it turns out it is not in their terms and they've said because we signed it we agreed to it. 

 

We disputed this because they lied and basically blackmailed us into signing it. 

 

We said we would complain to the ombudsman and all they've done is send us the invoice signed by us which matches the revised agreement. 

 

My question is should they honour the original credit agreement? 

Marke32

Link to post
Share on other sites

Need some dates please and what is your issue with the new compared with the old?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Three rhreads merged on same issue

please keep to one thread

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

when did you received the goods

what date did you sign the new agreement.

 

how has this extra £750 been calculated?

 

show the diff between the 2 agreements please 

maybe scan them to PDF after redaction.

read our upload guide carefully.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we received the goods on 16th Dec and signed the revised credit agreement a week earlier. 

 

I'm at work at moment so don't have the credit agreements with me. 

 

But from what we can see they took off our initial deposit of £750 twice from the balance 

Marke32

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah good so might be an easy sorted answer.

get the scans done and then we've proof.

just hide all your pers details and ref numbers but leave all dates/figures intact.

 

thanks.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked my partner to give me the original contract.

 

Unfortunately they were accessed via a link.

 

Barker & Stonehouse have now removed the original contract and its just linked to the amended one.

 

I guess there's nothing we can do now 

Edited by dx100uk
spacing

Marke32

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Barker Stonehouse/V12 retail finance. altering signed credit agreement

if they deducted your £750 deposit twice we dont need the old one?

if this is true, then i can't see an argument for you, it was a human admin mistake?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My point is we signed a legally binding contract. We asked them 3 times to check it, was told it was correct so signed as they did. 

 

They then said it was wrong and changed it. What is the point in having a contract if a company can change it whenever they please? 

Edited by marke32

Marke32

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not as they please, it's an admin error that would quite easily be explained and believed in a court of law.

they wrongly added your deposit twice.

 

look at it the otherway, you would have been quite happy if they'd got it right 1st time around and if the boot had been on the other foot and they hadn't deducted your deposit at all, you'd soon be on their case.

 

i can't see you've got anywhere to go IMHO.

 

sorry

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 They would probably turn round as say what we're saying though, and that it was our responsibility to check the agreement. But yes I hear what you're saying. Thanks for your input and help it's much appreciated 

Marke32

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...