Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bristow & Sutor Bailiffs & CTAX Debt - had NOE+Visit - now threat to remove goods? can they take a car worth 10x more than the debt?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 842 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

have council tax from previous yrs owed at 500 ish.....

question being   

what is situation regarding so called agents bailiffs ,  bristow and sutor..

.whatever they like

to label their action man suit with due to being afraid of real work and the need to wear a pretend uniform!!! 

and attempts to intimidate single mothers and old folks!! 

question is...

can they clamp and threaten to take a vehicle 10 x the value of  council tax owed   ??? 

when the amount owed is much smaller than the value of said vehicle,  vehicle used to get to work...

many thanks,

and keep up the  professional advice on hear  ...

... power in no s/...........

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ,

had a letter usual first letter,  owed 500 ish c tax...

.then a visit dropped of letter second stage i believe this is , 

 then third letter in post

usual procedure with their so called hard work costs involved and  added..... 

i know they target vehicles,  nothing occurred yet  ,,

all council tax related  from unknown figures around 2019   

my interest being on the value of car being more than is owed  .

can they take it and sell it .

what is the law on this matter...

and what happens to all the extra money from sale after the owed  amount is taken / assuming a vehicle can be taken...?

  again,

many thanks to you all, salt of the earth.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

short answer is if its your asset they could yes they could clamp it.

so keep it off the public highway... better still in a locked garage.

 

however, thats not the typical way things go if you deal with this properly

sadly you have come here with predetermined stereo types of who the bailiffs are and p'haps how to deal with this matter , and most probably ignored numerous letter from the council prior to the bailiffs turning up? like do you know when the liability order was attained by the council?

 

so you've had the notice of enforcement @£75 and you've also had a visit @£235, so you've all the fees now levied that they can on a CTAX debt £310?

 

is this correct please?

 

have you contacted the relevant council at all since leaving the property that the CTAX debt is all about?

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Bristow & Sutor Bailiffs & CTAX Debt - had NOE+Visit - now threat to remove goods? can they take a car worth 10x more than the debt?

so  can they take it away,?   said vehicle that is ,...even though value is is more than said owed amount  and can they sell the vehicle or would it be impounded 

 

sadly the predetermined stereo types come from experience....i will be contacting the council 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bailiffs typically clamp it till you pay.

can you please answer my questions?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have twice, they can clamp it if they can. but thats very rare where CTAX is involved nowadays

 

this is only a CTAX debt, its not like a magistrates court fine etc, whereby you might have had dealings with the seizure of a car before?

dont get confused.

 

is your car vulnerable? best to hide it a few streets away or lock it up.

 

busted and stupid can rather arm wave but if the car is safe from them, there is not a lot they can do bar hand the debt back to the council

there is no right of entry on a CTAX LO. once the fees are all charged thats just about as far as they normally go. it is only £500, or is it +£800 now with their fees added.

 

hence the letter rather than another time wasting visit whereby they cant extract any more money nor charge more fees.

 

whats the history please,

you ran away from an old CTAX debt from elsewhere ?

or this is past CTAX at your present home?

2yrs is a bit late for your current council to catch up on a historic 2019 LO

a bit of history can help us advise the correct way to approach the council concerned,

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

c tax is at present home   ..   ill try to reword my question ,

can they officially put it on a lorry to take away if they so decided,

,again i understand they ll clamp to intimidate payment..  ? 

i do usually when behind catch up with monthly c tax as explained to the council in previous letters to them, struggling to see where its owed but council sent letter saying owed 2019/ 2020   ,

what is the law regards taking a vehicle worth more than c /tax bill ?   

ive asked council for breakdown of where amount is owed by letter  ,

they replied with the c t /year,

im looking at wc scenario here thats all, .... 

do they often sell vehicles when ?

if taken and compounded etc     .........how common is it for vehicles to be taken and will it cost them.......

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

i will say again

they could clamp, but for ctax thats rare.

there are no examples of vehicles being towed, loaded on to flatbeds and impounded here over a CTAX debt, other debts like magistrate court fines and motoring offences yes. but not for a CTAX debt. so please can we move on and resolve the debt itself and find out if its legit.

is the debt £500 now total or with bailiff fees sits at £800ish ? as its very rare for a council to issue an LO for a £200 CTAX bill.

you say you've questioned the debt and the council have replied stating for 2019/20 period without a breakdown?

is this action something new and never before come up?

or you've had a running dispute since then about it?

if not this sounds like they have a historic debt section and are chasing old debts whereby the LO date could be interesting here if the current enforcement is outside of 12mts from the LO and enforcement has not been renewed....

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To save DX repeating his expert advice a fourth time the answer is yes, if they clamp your car to try and enforce payment they will eventually take it away. It does not matter that it's worth more than the debt to them.

 

Follow the advice you have been given and deal with this before it gets to that stage.

Edited by Homer67
typo
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

it started at 500 owed yes ,then went to around 800 after added bailiff costs ,

 

it is a new action yes, as far as i was aware id payed previous years and its and not come up before ,accept letter from council recently couple mths before these actions, at the moment about an previous yrs amount being owed.. i e the  said amount as above   ..

 

should i ask for the liability order date from  council ?

 

 

what are the usual procedures when vehicles "are" taken then  vary rarely  in those circumstances just trying to paint a picture here,

 

 

avatar    ....i am dealing with it ,this is why im here !    my arcs are covered,  i have  very genuine interests as the procedures here i e /clamping and removal of vehicles including values of goods taken by bailiffs that are more than the value of actual c.tax bill with added costs,and the afterwards usual procedure  by bailiffs regards c /tax issues after impounding a car and  what happens next usually...as i have no knowledge here and didnt think they could take goods more than the total value of owed amount ...

 

.if it is actually owed that is.

 

 

thanks very much all

Edited by The roadwarrior
Link to post
Share on other sites

there are no examples here of a car ever being clamped, then seized and impounded on a CTAX debt whereby its on private land or i'e a driveway. it could happen on a public road.

 

i would be writing to the council yes asking the date of the LO as you should have been informed the court case was happening, with a chance to resolve it 1st.

 

you might also wish to use this:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No bother.do that breathing space

 

Use the 60 days wisely and plan your attack carefully and properly, if you do this right then you could possibly get bailiffs fees removed.

 

The other thing to check is that the enforcement is current and has been renewed if the lo was more than 12mts ago. Many times youll find enforcement is has not been re requested.. Wink wink.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify the position regarding the question as to whether a bailiff is legally permitted to seize a vehicle that is far in excess of the amount of debt requested.

 

In this case, the council tax debt at the time of the Notice of Enforcement was £500. Unfortunately, instead of contacting the company to enter into a payment arrangement,  the matter was left and had resulted in a bailiff making a personal visit and the debt has now increased to around £750. From your initial post, your car could be worth approx £5,000. 

 

Vehicles are of course a preferred asset to seize. However, the legal position is that if the bailiff is able to gain 'peaceful entry' into your home and by doing so, is able to seize sufficient goods to clear the debt and bailiff fees, then he should not touch the car. If however, he is unable to gain entry....OR....there are not sufficient goods in the property to cover the debt.....then he is legally permitted to remove (and sell the vehicle). 

 

You need to be aware that a £5,000 car would likely raise significantly less than this when sold. Enforcement agents sales are generally auction sales (usually online). Because it would not be likely that the vehicle is sold with a V5C (Log Book) or service history, this would affect its sales price. From any sale, the enforcement company would need to deduct approx 14 days of storage fees (this could be up to £40 PER DAY). Auctioneers fees would also be deducted. 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

i do not and will not enter any payment arrangement with a bailiff company ....

especially for an amount from the council  that may not be valid yet !

i will not communicate with these types of people  

the hard  work and suffering involved .dropping an envelope through a letterbox .. for said fees  well !!      no comment  on that  

if everyone stopped blindly paying dca s tommorow..............................

thanks for advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

a bailiff is NOT a DCA.

a DCA can NEVER be a BAILIFF.

stop confusing the rules and powers for each or lumping them in the same barrel.

a bailiff does have powers to demand fees and if letters and visits were correct, then you will have to pay the fees

Even if you pay the council directly, bailiff fees are added to their balance and , if legitimate, will be taken first before any CTAX balance gets paid.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its best to request this information from the council. 

If the council have instructed the enforcement company to council a specific amount, then the bailiff is legally within his right to collect that sum...and add their fees as outlined in legislation (£75 Compliance Fee and £235 Enforcement fee). 

Until the council instruct their agent to cease enforcement, then your vehicle is at risk. 

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Scan the letter up to pdf read upload guide

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont need one, as i said read our upload guide

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...