Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That’s brilliant thanks for all the info, enjoy your evening.   Yeah, that makes a lot of sense about the F&F, definitely something worth considering to lower the amount of communications to deal with.   It’s good to know that newer debts can also be missing the documents needed, sounds more hopeful.   Thank you    
    • You are receiving what you bargained for / accepted, for both contracts (site access & tent). Did you book the tent for 4 nights, knowing you could only use 3. if the tent had been available for 3 nights only: you could have contracted for that. if it wasn’t, and your choice was “pay for 4 nights, get 3 nights use” or “don’t book” - you made your choice, and agreed a contract.   They are now offering others more, but provided you are receiving what you contracted for and no less, you don’t have a cause of action.   If you might get the extra tent night free, but only if you pay the access fee : you are still no worse off!   if you want to get “more value” from the tent contract : consider paying the site’s early access fee. If you choose not to you’ll still get what you originally contracted for so aren’t actually worse off, even if you feel slighted.
    • Hi,    I'm not sure if this is the correct forum for the following, and am looking for a general consensus or thoughts on whether i have cause to take action or not?  It's long winded but I've tried to be as concise as possible with the facts of the matter.    We booked a festival ticket for an event running from Friday to Monday, in addition we booked via a separate 3rd party company a luxury tent in that companies camp site within the festival. This was at a considerable cost.    Sometime after the purchase of the festival ticket, the organisers announced acts for the Thursday night and an early entry ticket for that night at a reduced cost.     We are not in a position to purchase an early access ticket, as we're unable to change our plans.  On the festival forum those who had purchased an early access ticket for Thursday entry questioned whether they would be able to have an extra night in the luxury tents, otherwise what would they do? The festival organisers said they would be able to. However when we queried the 3rd party they explicitly stated their site was not available on Thursday and would only be open Friday to Monday.  A number of other people reported the same response.   It was on that understanding that we did not actively try to make arrangements that would have allowed us to purchase an early access ticket.    Then all of a sudden the 3rd party changed its position and an email was received to say anyone booked into the 3rd party site would have a free night on Thursday if they had paid the festival organisers the small amount for the early access ticket.    It doesn't seem at all fair some can benefit from this, and some cannot, and I've no problem with anyone who does benefit.    I've messaged the 3rd party and they maintain the terms and conditions haven't changed, they've just added an extra free night that anyone with an early access ticket can take advantage of. This was not the case at the point of sale, because if it was we would have made arrangements to take advantage, instead we were only made aware after they changed their minds to permit this, and we're now not in a position to benefit.    I believe the terms and conditions have changed, and as a consequence I'm paying for a 4 night luxury Tent, and only receiving 3 nights.     I believe it is reasonable to receive either a refund for one night based on the cost now covering 4 nights, or a free night, and a refund of the cost of one night based on the original total of the 3 night contract.    Am i right or being stupid?   Thank you. 
    • Scotland - I know there are some differences when compared with England around statute barred, there may be others I'm not aware of so hopefully someone else is keeping and eye and will correct anything that is said.   I've plans this evening with the fam, so this may be rushed and I might miss something. Given you have so many accounts in different stages, it will be difficult to dig into each individually but the same will apply for all and we will get there   Priority debts are essentially anything that keeps a roof over your head. Anything consumer credit (CC, loan, store cards etc) are NOT priority debts.   Yes, that's what I meant, but really I just mean you will have choices with some saved in the bank. It makes sense on smaller accounts that you offer F&F to clear them IF they aren't already defaulted as it will just lower the amount of communications you will start getting - BUT defaulted debts will show on your credit record and affect you whether you pay them off or not, 6 years from the default, then they will disappear (could be 5 in Scotland, not sure)   You're quite correct that the older the debt, the more likely the paperwork is missing, but some of mine were very new (2020/21 also) and they couldn't provide the documentation..   Lets start here:   -  lower the pro rata on all to £1 (don't provide any income & expenditure info) -  CCA Request to each company that has bought the debt from OC (the last letter from OC will state they've been sold to xxxx) -  get access to credit file -  Forget your morals, they have none   For those debts already showing in default on your credit file and have been sold, you can stop paying entirely until you receive a complete CCA from them   I'll be back later   BT
    • Just a question out of curiosity. What will happen when the 6 years pass since all this began. By this I mean my moving out of the property and all that has followed? From what I can remember I definitely moved out either May or Jun 2016, as my dob is May and I moved out soon after celebrating it. So what will happen when 6 years pass, could someone please explain? Thank you 😊   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

Perch/TM Claimform - sons old Lending Stream PDL


merlin100
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 101 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, yes Im back again with another problem from my wayward son!

 

Hes just got a claim form (Northampton).

Claimant is Perch Capital LTD, and address for sending documents or payments is T M Legal Services. 

 

Its an old loan that he cant remember when he had it and thinks it might be Lending Stream.

Its possible it may be SB but not sure yet.

 

What Im asking is in relation to the Particulars of Claim.

It seems to me to be very vague, no dates of loan etc, in fact hardly any way of identifying anything.

 

This is the exact wording - 

 

"The claimant claims this amount in respect of an unpaid loan, regulated by The Consumer Credit Act 1974.

The loan was funded by GAIN Credit LLC.

The Defendant has failed to make payments in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement.

The credit agreement was assigned to the Claimant, upon which a Notice of Assignment was sent to the Defendant.

The Defendant has either failed to respond to the Claimant or has failed to make regular payments.

The Claimant has issued a Letter of Claim, providing the Defendant with a further opportunity to arrange repayment of the outstanding balance to no avail"

 

And thats it.

can you tell me if this is enough information to put before a court?

It seems very vague to me?

I have 4 days left before I have to acknowledge on MCOL to get the 28 days extension. 

 

CCA request will be posted to T M Legal in the morning (30th).

Is there anything else I can do?

 

Should also add that unusually, they are not claiming interest

 

Thanks all.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to legals

 

lots of like claims here exactly your players

 

please complete this and we'll get you moving.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Perch/TM Claimform - old Lending Stream PDL

Claimant - Perch Capital LTD

sols TM Legal

 

Issue date 19.11.2021

 

date for defence  - 21st December.

 

Exact wording of Particulars of claim -

 

1.The claimant claims this amount in respect of an unpaid loan, regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The loan was funded by GAIN Credit LLC.

 

2.The defendant has failed to make payments in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement.

 

3.The credit agreement was assigned to the claimant, upon which a Notice of Assignment was sent to the defendant.

 

4.The defendant has either failed to respond to the claimant or has failed to make regular payments.

 

5.The claimant has issued a letter of claim, providing the defendant with a further opportunity to arrange repayment of the outstanding balance to no avail.

 

What is the total value of the claim? £1668.00 + £115.00 court fee + £80.00 legal rep fee. Total £1863.00

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to Paragraph 3 of the PAPDC? Not known

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No.

 

Is the claim for a bank account (overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Loan.

 

When did you enter into the original agreement, before or after 2007? After 2007

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement? Online.

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files? 5 separate entries for Perch -

1. Opened 3.3.2018. Opening balance £150. Current balance £270. Updated Aug 2021. No data.

2. Opened 3.4.2018. Opening balance £250. Current balance £458. Updated Aug 2021. No data.

3. Opened 4.4.2018. Opening balance £170. Current balance £312. Updated Aug 2021. No data.

4. Opened 29.3.2018. Opening balance £350. Current balance £627. Updated Aug 2021. No data.

5. Opened 24.2.2018. Opening balance £400. Current balance £324. Updated Nov 2021. No data.

 

**No matter how I try, I cannot get any of these to add up to the claimed amount**

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the debt purchaser who has issued the claim  (Perch) 

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned - did you receive Notice of assignment? He doesnt know, all correspondence sent to a previous address.

 

Did you receive a default notice from the original creditor? Again, any correspondence sent to previous address.

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed "Notice of sum in Arrears" or "Notice of Arrears" at least once a year? Again, maybe sent to previous address.

 

Why did you cease payments? Never made any. 

 

What was the date of your last payment? None made.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No.

Edited by dx100uk
merged data and formatted
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Perch/TM Claimform - sons old Lending Stream PDL

sorry i see you put the poc in post 1...

 

are there any agreement numbers in the POC?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing whatsoever dx, thats why its very hard to chase it up.. Thought it might be deliberate which also makes me wonder why. I wondered if they were hoping for a default judgement with it because if thats all they have surely they have no case in a court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thata good for him then.

we've seen perch or someone try this before.

should be a walk in the park win.

 

ill post later with a guide for doing aos,cca and cpr bit.thats next.

out with sheep all day poss

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

I have 4 days left before I have to acknowledge on MCOL to get the 28 days extension. 

 

CCA request will be posted to T M Legal in the morning (30th).

Is there anything else I can do?

 

You have until Tues 7th to complete your acknowledgement of service but there's no reason not to do this today.

Everything else you seem to have in order so there's very little to do except prepare your CPR 31.14 and read other topics start looking at draft defences.

 

Andy

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
Go to HMRC's login page.
Click the GREEN sign in button.
Click “Create sign in details”
Enter your email address where asked.
You will now be emailed a confirmation code. ...
You will now be issued with a User ID for your government gateway account.
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 then log in to the MCOL Website
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
[BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ]
click thru to the end
confirm and exit MCOL.
..
get a CCA Request running to the claimant

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/

..

Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed

.

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
...
.[use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt]
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/

.

on BOTH type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork 
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

..............


 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what about the CPR request to TM legal?

yes we have defences along those lines.

 

there are also numerous threads here already on perch claimform, get reading as many as you can in the time before your defence is due.

 

use our enhanced google search box on most of our pages.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 30/11/2021 at 23:23, merlin100 said:

Claimant - Perch Capital LTD

sols TM Legal

 

Issue date 19.11.2021

 

date for defence  - 21st December.

plenty of threads here to read and understand what to put in your defence

use our enhanced google search box

 

perch/tm claimform

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi guys, bit of an update.

Got a reply from Northhampton acknowledging my defence. Letter is dated 22nd Dec and gives the claimant 28 days to contact the court if they wish to proceed otherwise the claim will be stayed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep std letter.

 

might be an idea to start reading up here now 

a few 10's of court claim threads so you know what might be next, how to react and what to do as the claim progresses through its stages.

 

use our enhanced google search box

 

perch claimform PDL

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all, bit of an update.

Now got forms from the court for mediation but Im not sure why?

Is this the court or the creditor instigating this?

And what would be the point bearing in mind that Perch never replied to the CCA Request and nor did T M Legal reply to the CPR Request?

Surely they must have an idea that we are simply going to say that we have no memory of this debt because of the lack of response from the creditor?

Or is there something I dont know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean N180 DQ?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of the process the claimant wishes to proceed.

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andyorch.

Yes Ive read all that.

What I dont understand what is the point of it.

 

Although it states that this usually happens when the creditor wishes to continue with the claim through mediation, the creditor, and their legal firm have not complied with the CCA Request and the CPR31.14 request. Consider that with a requirement of the Small Claims Mediation Service " the Parties or representatives should be familiar with the details of the dispute and be able to answer any queries raised"

 

Considering I have already stated that my son does not recognise this particular debt or the amount, and we have had no replies to our legitimate requests for information, we could not possibly satisfy that requirement.

 

I would not want to waste the time of the mediator, but as far as I can see all I could do is challenge the creditor on their failings to provide any proof or further information of the debt as requested. And should they turn up with any of that information, object to it being relied on.

Not sure what I would say here.

 

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mediation and allocation of the claim is just the next step.....you agree to mediation then when they contact you to arrange appointment inform them you are not in a position to mediate as the claimant has not complied with your requests and you dont have a clue what the debt is.

 

Then the claim proceeds to allocation alone......then they will have to disclose the documents...or discontinue the claim.

 

From your post above its obvious that you have not read any other threads of the same otherwise you would understand it and already know the process.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure how many times we need to state:

 

On 29/11/2021 at 23:35, dx100uk said:

lots of like claims here exactly your players

 

On 01/12/2021 at 22:59, dx100uk said:

there are also numerous threads here already on perch claimform, get reading as many as you can in the time before your defence is due.

 

use our enhanced google search box on most of our pages.

 

dx

 

On 18/12/2021 at 23:00, dx100uk said:

plenty of threads here to read and understand what to put in your defence

use our enhanced google search box

 

perch/tm claimform

 

On 04/01/2022 at 23:16, dx100uk said:

might be an idea to start reading up here now 

a few 10's of court claim threads so you know what might be next, how to react and what to do as the claim progresses through its stages.

 

use our enhanced google search box

 

perch claimform PDL

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read up on this guys and I do understand the procedure, maybe I should have made myself more clear.

 

Why would a creditor, and indeed the Mediation Service both waste their time when they only have to read the defence I submitted which subsequently was enough to get the claim stayed?

 

It simply seems to me to be a complete waste of time. Without further evidence it cannot proceed.

 

Im now beginning to see it along these lines - this is nothing more than a weak attempt by the creditor, perhaps with the help of the mediation service to get the little man to admit to all, or maybe part of the claim so the big man, even though he's screwed up with the paperwork, makes a few quid with the help of the machine and everyone, except the little man goes home happy!

 

That about it?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

It simply seems to me to be a complete waste of time. Without further evidence it cannot proceed.

 

Your not at the stage were they have to disclose their evidence yet...and its precisely what they hope you will think and throw in the towel.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Andy, this is the bit I wasnt sure of because as far as I am concerned, surely the evidence stage was passed when they didnt comply with the CCA and CPR Requests. 

Blame it on me being a naturally suspicious individual who maybe thinks too deeply into situations sometimes. Anyway, I will follow the advice of yourself and dx. Play the game, let it run its course and then get on with life. Thank you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...