Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
    • Isnt there some indication in there of at least intent to inform arbuthnot? IF he wasn't then it would seem to be Vennells decision to keep him 'uninformed .. Although seems to me if arbuthnot was unaware - he was either incompetent or should have very detailed records of denials. Seems vennells is constantly at the core of all the lying about all these issues though.
    • Paywalled/subscribe HB I'm unaware of the details on this HB but why is it a potential taxpayer burden? Hasn't a judge already ruled port has rights of access - so shouldn't costs be on the private company (South Tees Development Corporation) trying to change established access?     LIVE: High Court updates as CEO gives evidence in access rights row between STDC and PD Ports - Teesside Live WWW.GAZETTELIVE.CO.UK The face-off between the Teesport operator and Mayor Ben Houchen's South Tees Development Corporation continues in the High Court  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Idem now Hoist Finance pursuing an old Halifax credit card debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 838 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I had a credit card from the Halifax which after I lost my job,

I was paying £20 per month after discussing a lower payment.

This then went to Blair Oliver Scott and I kept paying.

 

After it went to Idem in May this year I stopped paying as I didn't think they had a right to collect.

 

They hassled me by phone ringing every day sometimes twice a day and I ignored them, partly because I am deaf and couldn't hear my phone.

 

now I have Westcot chasing me.

Can you please give me some advice?

Do I now have to pay Westcot?

Are they likely to take me to court?

Or shall I ignore them as well?

 

I don't know who will pursue me for this next maybe Kentucky Fried Chicken!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wetcloths dont buy debts only chase for their client who is the only one that can do court..the owner of the debt.

 

You should never ever talk on the phone about your debts

A dca is not a bailiff

And have ZERO legal powers

 

When did you take this out?

Ever sent a cca request?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who will be chasing me Idem?

 

Do I have to start to pay them?

And are they likely to take me to court?

 

Sorry I think I CCA'd Idem and they sent the £1 back.

The card was taken out on 2001

Link to post
Share on other sites

when did you CCA them?

 

you've been here for +10yrs

you've won several court claims yet you seen to fall down on doing the basics to protect yourself from these fleecers.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I CCA'd Idem in March they sent the postal order back and said that they would get the information I required, pestered me to death and now enter Westcot.

 

Yes you're right I have been intermittently on here for a long period of time and I have followed the advice given. I am not a regular visitor as I am currently sick and still receiving treatment after several operations.

 

I'm sorry if I have offended or annoyed you. I have managed to win a couple of claims thanks to this site yes, but each one involved different players Idem and Westcot are totally new to me and I can't keep pace with these clowns if I don't know who they are and what their powers are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you wont annoy me non at all I enjoy getting people out of the powerless DCA milking parlour

and even more preventing them from getting their hands on peoples money when they have zero legal right it.

all they do is use it to pay for staff holidays and free drinks allround

as well as things like this

 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/boss-of-a-debt-chasing-firm-link-financial-790005

 

http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/property-news/news/millionaire-debt-collector-digs-deep-south-kensington

 

as to what their powers are ZERO!!

A DCA is not a bailiff

And have ZERO legal powers

 

Just ignore wetcloths

they are not the owner

only the owner can do court and they do not have the agreement.

do not fall for their harassment and give in ever!!

 

being ill is the worst time for these things to happen

but really have go zero to worry about here

 

 

end off

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hello,

I have received letters from Hoist Finance about an old Halifax card.

 

I last paid anything in 2018 to a credit company, before it was claimed by so many debt companies, I didn't know if KFC had considered buying it.

 

Then up pops Hoist. I said the account was in dispute and to send me something linking it to me ie with my name.

 

Saturday I received a letter saying they had halted any action.

 

This morning I received a letter showing all transactions and my signature dated 2005. I am a pensioner with very little income now, so any payment needed would be minimal.

 

Nothing is showing on my credit account and I have rebuilt my credit score.

 

Do I have to interact with Hoist?

Can they take it to court?

 

Please advice me as to how I should carry on with this.

 

Thanking you in advance

Edited by dx100uk
Format
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless or until they send a letter of clam ignore them

If the do

Come back here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Idem now Hoist Finance pursuing an old Halifax credit card debt

I didn't know Idem was now Hoist. It's the same old circus then.

 

Should say they threatened to send someone round to my house but stopped action when I disputed the claim.

I am afraid they will send someone to my house as I am nearly housebound I'm in all the time and I can't face these people off.

 

Sorry to be a nuisance, my memory is not as good as it once was, but what is the reason this "debt" doesn't show on my credit report?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i haven't said idem are hoist?

hoist have purchased quite a few portfolios of very old debts from idem as idem got fined by the authorities awhile back and went very quiet for a long while as they were misleading debtors on many fronts even in court cases.

 

as for the debt not showing, it won't , the original creditors default notice has obviously exceeded it's 6th birthday. when that happens a debt is removed from your file.

 

The Information Commissioners Office says:
.
All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years 
has passed from date of default, whether paid off, paying now or not. 
.
{the WHOLE ACCOUNT WILL VANISH, never to return}.
.
{however, this does not mean the debt itself is not still owed
consider a CCA request.}
.
This is so that someone who continues paying something 
- even after 6 years from default 
- should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default 
and ends up with a clean file after 6 years. 
.
NOTE: {the bracketed text is not Information Commissioners Office guideline but my advise]
 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, bolly1 said:

This morning I received a letter showing all transactions and my signature dated 2005. I am a pensioner with very little income now, so any payment needed would be minimal.

 

 

any chance you can scan up all they sent to one mass PDF?

 

read our upload guide carefully.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bolly1 said:

Should say they threatened to send someone round to my house but stopped action when I disputed the claim.

I am afraid they will send someone to my house as I am nearly housebound I'm in all the time and I can't face these people off.

 

NO DCA nor their doorstepping mates are BAILIFFS and never ever can be.

 

a DCa is NOT a bailiff

and have

ZERO legal powers on ANY debt, no matter what it's type.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will upload the stuff today. The first page is a photocopy of my Personal details from Halifax. Page 2 is terms and conditions with my signature dated 26/01/2006 and the rest are statements not on Halifax paper, ie no logo just type,  dated from 02/02/2006-02/12/2008. The statements are not worth sending them all but will send one to show you what I mean.

 

Thanks so much for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Right,  sent CCA and now uploading what they sent me. the half page report was just my name and address at the top, which I removed. The others are a page with my signature and  my personal details. Would love to hear your views. Thank you so much, I do appreciate your help.

 

Name showing in para 1 of the agreement upload unapproved.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

is that all they sent..😉

 

there are several pages missing as well as the T&C which must have your correct address for the time of take out on them.

 

pers as long as hoist have your correct and current address (if you have moved since taking that out and not informed HBOS or Idem in writing of the move) then simply ignore them until/unless you get a letter of claim.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's all they sent after I requested that they show proof that they have  a right to pursue me. There were several pages of transactions from very early on  but that's it. I will wait and see what the CCA throws up. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you sent a new CCA request?

if not don't - never kick pram wheels after a phishing letter.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

today I received a letter from Hoist, all they sent was pages  1and 3 of the PDF I already uploaded with this letter. (Dated 7/12/2021 which I received today the 11/12/2021) 

 

Dear XXXX, Further to your request for a copy agreement for the above account, please find enclosed the relevant documentation for your attention.

 

Please note if an original agreement was not available, under the Consumer Credit Act a reconstituted copy may be provided.

 

If you are not already making payments towards your account, please forward your affordable payment proposals to us. We have placed your account on hold for the next 14 days, after which time collection activity will resume on the account.

Should you have any queries or concerns during this time, please do not hesitate to contact is on 03452668876 or alternatively you can email us.

 

Thanks

The Hoist Team.

 

I would be grateful for your thoughts on this and what my next step should be.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 24/11/2021 at 17:16, dx100uk said:

pers as long as hoist have your correct and current address (if you have moved since taking that out and not informed HBOS or Idem in writing of the move) then simply ignore them until/unless you get a letter of claim.

they now have your correct and current address from the CCa request and have written back, so backdoor CCJ prevented.

 

simply follow the above .

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like 99% of debts that mugs blindly give free money to dca's for.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...