Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
    • Hi DX - quick question, what is the bank likely to do when they get my letter of change of address ? also what is the worst they can do? thanks J1L
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/Overdales - PAPLOC Now Claimform - 2x Old Shop Direct Isme/Very Cat debts


finaldj
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well its not for you to decide, but the judge if/when its pointed out in your witness statement

IF IF IF the claim ever gets that far..............

 

just get the N180's off.

 

your local court is not the 2nd option, its the only one, but via a telephone hearing..as you said the fleecers requested one and you agree?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I haven't agreed to anything yet I am just about to start filling the N180 form out so I am looking at -

 

1) small claim mediation (yes)

 

2) small claims track (yes)

 

3) it asks which CC hearing do you want this to take place - they have put telephone hearing which the claimant will endeavour to arrange

I am assuming I would be filling this in saying I agree to a telephone hearing? if not what would I put in place?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

I am assuming I would be filling this in saying I agree to a telephone hearing?

 

Yes if you are also happy....if not state local county court with name. The court may decide it will be a telephone hearing irrespective due to back log workload so the decision is then made for you.

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont give the fleecers your email/sig/phone on their copy of the N180.

do NOT use email to send them/court

 

royal mail only

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't got copies of the default notices yet for both accounts from the original creditor by which Overdales wrote to me on the 3rd February to say they were asking for them.

 

In this instance do I still agree to mediation or refuse because all the paper work isn't here? form has to be in by the 14th March so need to get it posted by Friday at the latest

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 06/02/2022 at 01:30, dx100uk said:

you dont talk to them during mediation..the mediator does

 

if they have not sent you enough information to make an informed decision to even enter mediation then you'll be saying no to the mediation service when they call. till then you agree to mediation on the N180 IF one comes from the court.

 

there is ZERO requirement for a claimant to supply any documentation until the disclosures stage much later in the claim IF it ever goes that far.

should they fail then, you'll obviously win. and even if they do, who says its enforceable!  

 

i really do wish you'd bother to read at least your own thread to date before posting sometimes...

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what bit did you do? :noidea:

you agree to mediation on the n180

you continue to do so right until the very day the actual telephone mediation call takes place.

 

when it does, the same n180 question is asked...

have you enough information etc etc.

. it's THEN when, if you have not received something that is important to your decision, like say no DN's comes into play...

so you then refuse mediation by saying no, ....i do not have enough information to make an informed decision to enter into mediation.

 

the idea is you are seen to enter into 'the spirit' of mediation by giving the claimant as much time as possible to give you what is needed....

that will bode well for you later on.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Further update,

 

The Mediation company have set a date for 27th April. However overdales haven't sent me copies of the original default notice from the original lenders as they said they would in a letter I got from them sometime ago.

 

There is also the 2 credit agreements they sent me one is right the other is blank so as per your advice in the past posts I will be emailing the mediation company with the provided address they gave me to let them know that Overdales haven't sent the required paperwork for mediation to take place.

 

If it goes as far as a court case and a date is set. Is it possible to change the date around my work e.g days off?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would wait until the day of the actual call as it says above.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll need to set another date with them then as I can't make the 27th anyway. They called me today asking to call them or email them to confirm the date or not. I'll email them and give them some dates I am available

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wondering I've emailed the mediation service with some dates I can do but then got an automatic reply back saying date changes need to be called through so will need to do that next week.

Having read through the letter they sent.

 

one of the 3 questions asks me - I have enough information about the claim to enter into negotiations and do not require any further evidence from the other party before starting mediation

 

Well this isn't true there are documents still missing and some not correct. While you say take the call and say on the day mediation won't work for ABC reasons the application is asking me this information before we start mediation.

I would effectively be telling porkies saying I do when I don't?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/03/2022 at 00:07, dx100uk said:

the idea is you are seen to enter into 'the spirit' of mediation by giving the claimant as much time as possible to give you what is needed....

that will bode well for you later on.

 

 

 

already answered.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would await the actual mediation call 

Then 

On 10/03/2022 at 00:07, dx100uk said:

what bit did you do? :noidea:

you agree to mediation on the n180

you continue to do so right until the very day the actual telephone mediation call takes place.

 

when it does, the same n180 question is asked...

have you enough information etc etc.

. it's THEN when, if you have not received something that is important to your decision, like say no DN's comes into play...

so you then refuse mediation by saying no, ....i do not have enough information to make an informed decision to enter into mediation.

 

the idea is you are seen to enter into 'the spirit' of mediation by giving the claimant as much time as possible to give you what is needed....

that will bode well for you later on.

 

 

 

Re Read your thread, ......

 

again this question has already been answered.....like the last one 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX,

 

They left me a voicemail last week asking me if I want the 27th April call to go ahead as spaces are limited and to call if I need a new date. They went on further to say that there are 3 questions on the form they sent me and if I can't answer yes to all 3 then mediation can't take place.

 

I had missed the 3 questions on the form the first time having got back home and looked at the forms again. question 2 as stated already - I have enough information about the claim to enter into negotiations and do not require any further evidence from the other party before starting mediation

 

I would effectively be lying to the mediation service agreeing for it to take place based on the question they asked me about having all the information when signing the form and agreeing for talks to take place.

 

I don't have all the information, there are parts missing they haven't sent me, what do I do if I sign the form agree I have them then on the day say actually I don't have all the information so it can't take place. all I have done is mess the service about that other people could have used it might make me look bad then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, dx100uk said:

the idea is you are seen to enter into 'the spirit' of mediation by giving the claimant as much time as possible to give you what is needed....

that will bode well for you later on.

missed the three questions... you come here asking questions and help

but everytime, somewhere along the road, you just dont read things and make schoolboy error after schoolboy error, and that leads to your continued misunderstanding of situations.

 

we on CAG take the time and trouble to help people.

we expect that time and trouble to atleast be reciprocated by reading the free non paid advice we at CAG give.

 

you are not lying to the mediation service, you are as the quote above.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not perfect, I have read links in the posts you've replied to over and over again and I'll be honest I find some of it complex.

 

I've always appreciated the advice you give and wouldn't have gone it alone myself in dealing with DCA's hadn't it been for the advice on here.

 

I've managed it well upto the point of the whole court process which is where I have struggled. I've got some of it right so far it's the mediation bit I've struggled with.

 

For you this stuff is probably easier now you've answered so many people this is my first time I've no doubt should I end up down this route again in the near future It will be easier to do.

 

I've called the Mediation service today as they don't accept date changes via emails.

 

The Lady was pretty nice on the phone, I explained about the dates, I mentioned about question 2 refering to the CCA request and lack of information and would this cause issue as this has been my defence throughout the case leading upto you. I mentioned about the default notices that they were getting from the original creditor and haven't heard anything from them for at least 3/4 months and that despite contacting them 4 times one of the contracts they sent still remains blank, no signiture, no APR ratings and no credit limit and no mention of what that T&C relates to.

 

I said that if a new date was set for say a few weeks time, Overdales are no longer contacting me now would it make a difference as I can't answer yes to question 2. She said well the whole point would be to have this information at hand and given that this could have taken place next week it's unlikley then that anything will change. She said in this instance it would be best to refer the matter back to the court rather than set a new date.

 

She said it would be upto the courts what to do next interms of what information you both currently have.

 

Lets see what happens next.

 

How long does this usually take for the courts to get involved? would it be upto Overdales at this stage now to take the next steps?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just to update this further.

 

Since it was past back to the courts in early April because mediation didn't go ahead. I've heard nothing since then from Overdales or the courts till I checked my junk folder and they sent me an email 2 weeks ago about reducing the debt or may take court action if they hear nothing back

 

Is there a time frame they have to abide by or will it stay in limbo from now on till they decide to take it to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is the status of the claim on MCOL?

 

looks like its now stayed and it will cost them £275 to lift the stay.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Says this on the MCOL page

 

A claim was issued against you on 31/12/2021

Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 09/01/2022 at 23:22:28

Your acknowledgment of service was received on 10/01/2022 at 08:05:12

Your defence was received on 28/01/2022

DQ sent to you on 24/02/2022

DQ filed by claimant on 24/02/2022

You filed a DQ on 04/04/2022

Your claim was transferred to LEEDS on 29/04/2022

 

Does this mean it's just waiting for a hearing date then? I know there can be a backlog.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably yes 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

DQ sent to you on 24/02/2022

DQ filed by claimant on 24/02/2022

You filed a DQ on 04/04/2022

 

Why did you file your DQ seven weeks after receipt ? 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...