Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Group Nexus ANPR PCN - Westside Retail Park, Guiseley Leeds LS20 9NE ***Cancelled by Retail Park***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 876 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter received a letter yesterday regarding an overstay at a local retail park. He had taken her disabled Grandma shopping & for Lunch in Costa, so they have receipts etc.

Is it out of time as she only received it in the post yesterday? 

What is the best thing to do now with it?

Thank You

 

 

2021-11-08 Group Nexus PCN for Incident 2021-10-29.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Date of the infringement 29/10/2021

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 08/11/2021

3 Date received 17/11/2021

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] I will check when i get home, didn't bring letter to work

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A

7 Who is the parking company? Group Nexus

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Westside Retail Park, Guiseley Leeds LS20 9NE

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Group Nexus ANPR PCN - Westside Retail Park, Guiseley Leeds LS20 9NE

There isn’t a drop down for incorrect details so would have to put other 

also would you put keeper name in the appeal as it does ask for name & email address

 

i have put the following in the text box for the appeal 

 

PCN contains incorrect details

This is an appeal by the keeper. No driver details will be given.  Please dont try the usual group nexus trick of asking for driver details(as your way of trying to get round a non Pofa notice). This wont work and will be ignored.

Notice to keeper is non pofa so no keeper liability

This is an auto win at POPLA.

Please cancel or issue a Popla code where you will auto withdraw.

End

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...