Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wellington court financial services ltd not paying out on FOS final decision RE: +£58k Pension- help enforcing & using form N322A - court claim issued


Simmonds7

Recommended Posts

I won my claim through FOS which went to Ombudsman for final decision. 

 

They were given 28 days to pay which runs out this Friday 19th November 2021.  I am getting ready to file N322A form to courts so I can enforce the order.

 

  It has already been 2 years to get this far and I'm sick of being messed about so am going for it.  I will drop dead with shock if they actually pay on Friday.

 

  The question I have is how do I work out how much they owe me?  This is for a FA Company transferring a pension into a sipp.

 

  I put in a claim originally for £130,000 when I started the claim with fOS, using what the pension would of been worth if left where it was, interest and compensation.

 

  I have no idea how to work out what the amount is that the FOS have awarded using their formula.

 

  Help please.

Edited by dx100uk
added A few blank lines only..dx
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

I am trying to work out what the Amount awarded is.

 

invested was £52,800.  Pension was valued at £92,000 by previous pension before moving into sipp. 

 

Fos award states...

The Orbis SIPP.........for half the
investment: FTSE UK Private Investors Income
Total Return Index; for the other half: average rate from fixed rate bonds.


From date of investment to date of my final decision


8% simple per year on any loss from the end date to the date of settlement

 

I work it out as follows...

£77,908.84 owed (used https://www.pensionclaims.co/pension-redress-calculators)
£44 Court fee
£1,478.95 sipp fees for 5 years (295.79 pa)
£300 compensation
£28075.13 interest from 2015 to today (on original £52,800)
Total = £107,806.92
£8,624.55 8% fee for late payment
Owes total £116,431.47

 

Would this be correct?  I don't want to put the wrong amount owed on Court form and give them am excuse to challenge the CCJ or get myself into trouble.

 

Thank you for all the help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Help Enforcing FOS final decision using form N322A - FA Company transferring a pension into a sipp.

The award states...

That for half the
investment: FTSE UK Private Investors Income Total Return Index;

for the other half: average rate from fixed rate bonds.

 

From date of investment to date of my final decision

 

Amount originally invested was £52,800

 

8% simple per year on any loss from the end date to the date of settlement

 

Had no communication from company that I have won against.

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Wellington court financial services ltd not coughing up on FOS final decision RE: +£58k Pension- help enforcing & using form N322A

I have finally had an email from Wellington court financial services ltd. 

 

Here it is, I'm am lost for words on their stupidity....

 

"Please kindly ask yourself the following basic principles of any enquiry/redress which should be based on the facts; “ what, why, when, how, where and who”, The Six Honest Men.


We repeat you have not been a client of Wellington Court Financial Services Ltd.

 

You have not received advice from Wellington Court Financial Services Ltd. There is no evidence that you have been a client of Wellington Court Financial Services Ltd for example; basic due diligence documentation, copy of ID or passport, copy of your utility bill, Know-Your-Client, Terms of Business, Suitability Reports, etc. Have you provided and obtained those documents from Mr John Picket of JCP Direct or any other third party?


Any redress should be forwarded to:
• Guinness Mahon Trust Corporation/Orbis SIPP, Hartley Pensions Ltd who acquired the pension assets of Guinness Mahon Trust Corporation and the trustee Hartley Pensions Trustees Ltd,
• and/or the person who advised you and/or you were speaking and instructing directly,
• and/or your unnamed accountant,
• and/or Mr John Picket of JCP Direct as confirmed by you who you were dealing with.


Please cease and desist from making an unwarranted claim and threats. Wellington Court Financial Services Ltd reserve the right to protect its interests and good name with the utmost vigour of the law.


Yours sincerely,
Wellington Court Financial Services Ltd"

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the information I will have a read.

 

I have informed FCA already and they have noted it.  I will contact them again Monday to give them the update on their last email.

 

I have phoned my case worker at FOS twice and no call back yet. I have forwarded their emails to her though.

 

I know of 200 that are after Wellington court financial services ltd in regards to Guiness Mahon alone.

 

I will look into the Irish Ombudsman too.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My accountant introduced me to a guy that was an introducer but not FCA registered so couldn't do the transfer etc so gave our details to Wellington court financial services ltd who phoned us and dealt with everything and advised us to go with dolphin 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I reported them to financial regulator in Ireland and here in UK for non compliance of FOS final decision.  Got a reply from them.....

 

Thank you for your emails dated 21.11.2021 and 22.11.2021.

 

We understand that you are a very angry man as you have been badly let down by Guinness Mahon and Dolphin Capital.

 

Please note:

 

You know that you did not have any dealings with Wellington Court Financial a Service Ltd (Wellington) and did not receive advice from Wellington.

 

You clearly instructed and dealt with third parties unknown to us.

 

You gave transfer instructions directly to your pension plan providers to transfer your pension/s to Guinness Mahon who invested in an unregulated fund in Germany, Dolphin Capital.

 

You have lodged an unwarranted complaint against Wellington with the FOS.

 

You appear to have entered into a conspiracy to defraud Wellington for your commercial benefit.

 

The decision from FOS is based on a mammoth cover up and fraudulent documentation that has been produced as evidence.

 

As previously stated your claim against Wellington Court Financial Services Ltd is fraudulent.

 

Please refer to Fraud Act 2016, (Fraud by false representation {Section 2}, Fraud by failure to disclose information when there is a legal duty to do so {Section 3}, Obtaining services dishonestly {Section11})

 

The FCA is fully aware of the Guinness Mahon matter, involvement of third parties and their clients making fraudulent claims since 2016.

 

Any liability is denied as it is a fraudulent claim.

 

We value our regulatory status and we do not deal with unregulated products. We have not had any dealings or connection with Dolphin Capital in the UK, Ireland or abroad.

 

We reserve the right to file a counterclaim into the court for your fraudulent claim and damages to our good name and standing.

 

With respect you are “barking up the wrong tree”.

 

By sending us threatening and blackmailing emails you will not achieve your goals and may get yourself involved into unforeseen problems.

 

Therefore in your own interests you should put this matter into “balanced hands” and appoint a solicitor to deal with these issues before they get out of hand.

 

Please feel free to forward our email to the FOS if you wish.

 

Should you wish to discus the content of this email please do not hesitate to contact us or let us know the best time and we will telephone you.

 

Our solicitors will contact you shortly.

 

Wellington Court Financial Services Ltd reserves the right to protect its interests and its good name with the utmost vigour of the law.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No personal name was given just Wellington court at the end. 

Have phoned FOS 3 times and left messages, no return call received yet. 

 

Have forwarded all emails onto FOS but no reply yet. 

Have sent 3 emails asking them to advise etc and again no reply. 

 

Am emailing my MP Monday if still no reply from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure first one was...

"Today is day 28 since the legally binding final decision from the Financial Ombudsman Service was given and accepted by myself.  I have not had a reply to previous email or any correspondence from your company.  


Can you confirm payment will be made today? or a date when it will be paid.  


I want to hear from you by close of business today. 


As of Tomorrow 8% interest will be added for late payment and the form N322A will be filed at court on Monday.  This is just a formality so I can enforced payment with High Court Sheriffs.  The court costs and High Court sheriffs costs will be added to the amount owed.  


It is in the company's best interest to pay the amount owed and Communicate with myself as I am sure you do not want a CCJ on file against your company and high court sheriffs at your door. "


THEN SECOND EMAIL SENT WAS.....


"I have reported you to FCA for non compliance of FOS legally binding final decision.  I have also reported you to your other financial regulator at Central Bank of Ireland.  Both do not look favourable on non compliance of an FOS final decision.


I request that you reply to my response of your email sent Friday by end of today and confirm receipt of this email.


I am trying to assist your company by letting you know of the additional costs that will be incurred from high court sheriffs not threaten, I have won my case against you and i do intend to enforce it."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got a reply from fOS

 

I’m sorry to hear that Wellington Court Financial Services Limited hasn’t complied with the ombudsman’s decision.

 

Unfortunately, there is little more that the Financial Ombudsman Service can now do.

We have let the regulator (the FCA) know about this issue.

 

But that might not be enough to change Wellington Court’s mind so you may need to consider taking legal advice for the best way to enforce the decision.

I’m sorry this isn’t the answer you were looking for. But we don’t have the power to enforce decisions – ultimately only the courts can do that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...