Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
    • Hi DX - quick question, what is the bank likely to do when they get my letter of change of address ? also what is the worst they can do? thanks J1L
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

V's MBNA, Abbey Credit Card


ehstevie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6310 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I've received my statements after my SAR on 11/11/06. With my statements was a covering letter from Abbey Credit Card stating that they value my business (although account closed 2004, paid in full) and attached a cheque for £380 as a goodwill gesture ''on the basis that this is in full and final settlement of your complaint''. My charges total £930, so I have written back twice since, rejecting their offer, stating that I will only accept the cheque as partial payment, and on the basis that I will pursue the remainder via court, although there has not been any response to my letters. I still haven't cashed the cheque, but I could do with the cash. I am due to issue my MCOL against MBNA Monday 11 December 06.

Can I cash this and still issue MCOL for remainder?

Thanks

RBoS:(£570): *** WON *** £570 settled in full - HERE

Lloyds TSB: ** WON **

Abbey: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, 14/11/06 statements rec'd & partial offer (30%), declined, LBA sent 26/11/06

Studio Catalogue: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, Prelim sent 21/11/06, won £94.95 refunded.

Capital 1: S.A.R 02/10/06, off’d diff between £20 and £12, declined 21/11/06

A&L: S.A.R -02/10/06, prelim sent 21/11/06, rejected, LBA sent 26/11/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bump, help please.

RBoS:(£570): *** WON *** £570 settled in full - HERE

Lloyds TSB: ** WON **

Abbey: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, 14/11/06 statements rec'd & partial offer (30%), declined, LBA sent 26/11/06

Studio Catalogue: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, Prelim sent 21/11/06, won £94.95 refunded.

Capital 1: S.A.R 02/10/06, off’d diff between £20 and £12, declined 21/11/06

A&L: S.A.R -02/10/06, prelim sent 21/11/06, rejected, LBA sent 26/11/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone??

RBoS:(£570): *** WON *** £570 settled in full - HERE

Lloyds TSB: ** WON **

Abbey: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, 14/11/06 statements rec'd & partial offer (30%), declined, LBA sent 26/11/06

Studio Catalogue: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, Prelim sent 21/11/06, won £94.95 refunded.

Capital 1: S.A.R 02/10/06, off’d diff between £20 and £12, declined 21/11/06

A&L: S.A.R -02/10/06, prelim sent 21/11/06, rejected, LBA sent 26/11/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes cash the cheque. Stevie before you start you mcol have u added contractual interest? If not this may be worth doing as this will probably double your claim as the APR will be around 24.9%.

 

Rob

HALIFAX

12/09/06 Halifax settled in full £8500:D

MBNA

28/11/06 MBNA Settled in full £2300:D

 

Capital one

Putting together n1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks rob14973

 

I will be submitting MCOL on 21/12/06.

 

My claim will be £930 Plus £302.39 interest (plus courts costs), this was calculated at 8% from when the charges were levied. Then I'm claiming Judicial Interest at 8% until settlement/Judgement.

 

Are you saying I can claim 24.9% from the date the charges were levied to the account until date of service, then 8% judicial interest thereon in?

 

thanks

RBoS:(£570): *** WON *** £570 settled in full - HERE

Lloyds TSB: ** WON **

Abbey: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, 14/11/06 statements rec'd & partial offer (30%), declined, LBA sent 26/11/06

Studio Catalogue: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, Prelim sent 21/11/06, won £94.95 refunded.

Capital 1: S.A.R 02/10/06, off’d diff between £20 and £12, declined 21/11/06

A&L: S.A.R -02/10/06, prelim sent 21/11/06, rejected, LBA sent 26/11/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stevie

 

If you claim contractual interest. you cannot claim the 8% at the mcol stage.

 

The best way to work out the contractual interest daily at 24.9% APR is to use a spreadsheet from vampiress chambers(search vampiress) using the spreadsheet and the highest rate paid(Ring custome service to find out) on your card will probably double your claim.

 

Good example is myself claimed for £900 and with contractual interest at 24.9 highest rate. my final claim £2300

 

If you decide to go down this route you will have to re start your claim.

 

rob

HALIFAX

12/09/06 Halifax settled in full £8500:D

MBNA

28/11/06 MBNA Settled in full £2300:D

 

Capital one

Putting together n1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rob, just to clarify, I haven't started my MCOL as yet, will be doing so on the 21/12/06 though.

I still don’t really understand the contractual interest, I know where the 24.9% comes from, but between what stages can I claim this?

From date when charges were levied to service date? Then 8% from service date to settlement?

Your help much appreciated in the matter.

thanks Rob.

RBoS:(£570): *** WON *** £570 settled in full - HERE

Lloyds TSB: ** WON **

Abbey: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, 14/11/06 statements rec'd & partial offer (30%), declined, LBA sent 26/11/06

Studio Catalogue: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, Prelim sent 21/11/06, won £94.95 refunded.

Capital 1: S.A.R 02/10/06, off’d diff between £20 and £12, declined 21/11/06

A&L: S.A.R -02/10/06, prelim sent 21/11/06, rejected, LBA sent 26/11/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You can claim contractual interest right from the start of your claim. The s.69 8% interest can only be claimed when submitting a court claim. But you cannot claim both.

 

you claim the interest on charges from the the day they were levied. As i posted earlier if u use one of vampiress spreadsheets from her chambers it will work the 24.9% at a dialy rate for u.

HALIFAX

12/09/06 Halifax settled in full £8500:D

MBNA

28/11/06 MBNA Settled in full £2300:D

 

Capital one

Putting together n1

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, lol, just to clarify. My understanding is this:

 

My claim is for £930, interest to this date is approx £931, calculated at 24.9% APR (I have the spreedsheet). Total claim £1,861.

 

Now, when I submit MCOL, I claim for total amount of £1,861 + s69 judicial interest @ 8% on £1,861 from date of service to date of settlement.

 

Hope I have it right, please correct me if not.

RBoS:(£570): *** WON *** £570 settled in full - HERE

Lloyds TSB: ** WON **

Abbey: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, 14/11/06 statements rec'd & partial offer (30%), declined, LBA sent 26/11/06

Studio Catalogue: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, Prelim sent 21/11/06, won £94.95 refunded.

Capital 1: S.A.R 02/10/06, off’d diff between £20 and £12, declined 21/11/06

A&L: S.A.R -02/10/06, prelim sent 21/11/06, rejected, LBA sent 26/11/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do I find out what the contractual interest rate is/was? Also, what is contracual Interest?

RBoS:(£570): *** WON *** £570 settled in full - HERE

Lloyds TSB: ** WON **

Abbey: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, 14/11/06 statements rec'd & partial offer (30%), declined, LBA sent 26/11/06

Studio Catalogue: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, Prelim sent 21/11/06, won £94.95 refunded.

Capital 1: S.A.R 02/10/06, off’d diff between £20 and £12, declined 21/11/06

A&L: S.A.R -02/10/06, prelim sent 21/11/06, rejected, LBA sent 26/11/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the contractual rate of interest will be on your statements, but i think you are better off going at 24.9 % unless your statements give a better figure. i worked out contractual at 27.9% purely because one month the interest level was at over 30%. The bottom of your statements should be where MBNA disclose their interest rates.

Thanks

 

 

 

23/11/06 HSBC **SETTLED**

30/12/06 - GE Capital - **SETTLED**

30/12/06 - MBNA - charges and interest **SETTLED**

 

30/12/06 - Welcome Finance - Prelim sent for mis-sold PPI

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ps. your spreadsheet worked out the contractual interest for you, contractual interest is the interest rate in which you are contracted to under your T&Cs with MBNA eg 16.9 percent variable (ie. they whack it up for cash advances :p)

Thanks

 

 

 

23/11/06 HSBC **SETTLED**

30/12/06 - GE Capital - **SETTLED**

30/12/06 - MBNA - charges and interest **SETTLED**

 

30/12/06 - Welcome Finance - Prelim sent for mis-sold PPI

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, lol. getting there.

 

Not sure how i word my POC for interest at 24.9%. I have looked at the templates but they refer to the judicial rate of 8%. Can someone who has claimed contractual interest rate via MCOL please post the POC used.

 

Many thanks

RBoS:(£570): *** WON *** £570 settled in full - HERE

Lloyds TSB: ** WON **

Abbey: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, 14/11/06 statements rec'd & partial offer (30%), declined, LBA sent 26/11/06

Studio Catalogue: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, Prelim sent 21/11/06, won £94.95 refunded.

Capital 1: S.A.R 02/10/06, off’d diff between £20 and £12, declined 21/11/06

A&L: S.A.R -02/10/06, prelim sent 21/11/06, rejected, LBA sent 26/11/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...