Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EVRi - lost Parcel (Scotland) - SPC Claim Issued **SETTLED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 872 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I don't think this is particularly different from many of the sorry stories on this site, but will share in case it is of help/interest.

 

I was sending a parcel (ebay sale - a boardgame worth £20) from Scotland to England.  After it not moving for over 3 weeks, raised a support ticket with Hermes.  The next day they said it was lost and pointed me at their claims form.

 

Filled in the claim form (on 28th Sep) and on 27th Oct Hermes updated asking for proof of value etc.  However, they didn't send a notification to me, so I didn't discover this until I logged in on 27/10  to chase them.  

 

Provided the required info, but they now state that as I didn't reply within 14 days, I've broken their T&Cs.

 

As an aside, I do wonder if not sending you a notification email is a deliberate business practice so that they can then invoke their "14 days" rule to try to avoid liability.

 

I replied stating that their 14 day rule was irrelevant and gave them 14 days before I started the small claims (as it's in Scotland, The Simple Procedure).  No reply (in fact, they marked the ticket as resolved - looks like this was done by an automated process).

 

So, I just submitted the SImple Procedure process online.  It was very straightforward and cost £19.  The only tricky bit was there's a statement around interest, but Citizens Advice suggested you could say you want the sheriff to "apply interest at the judicial rate".

 

Thanks for all the advice and stories on this forum - it helped me understand they really are just a bunch of unethical chancers trying to scare you off.

 

I'll provide updates once things have slowly moved forward.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite right that the 14 day rule is a load of nonsense. It's simply another trick that they pull to discourage a huge number of their customers who have legitimate claims.

This is rank dishonesty from Hermes.

When it goes to mediation – as it surely will, stand your ground. Simply tell the mediator that you will go to court and the judge will completely agree with you that this is an unfair term and unenforceable under the consumer rights act. Tell the mediator to tell Hermes that once you get that judgement you will make sure that everybody knows that Hermes are fundamentally dishonest to try and pull this kind of trick on innocent people

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Hermes - lost Parcel (Scotland) - SPC Claim Issued

Incidentally – and for anyone who visits this thread, any of these time limits for making a claim are completely unenforceable. Insurance companies often do it – giving you 28 days or something to make a claim otherwise you lose your rights. Also some retailers do it.

It's disgusting and unenforceable and dishonest and it really should be made illegal because I'm sure lots of people take these companies at their word and simply regret not having begun their claim earlier.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

mediation?...scotland?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never been through the Simple Procedure, so I don't know if mediation is a part of it - the help on the website implied you should try mediation *before* you start the Simple Procedure.

 

The process must have kicked-off as Hermes "legal department" just emailed me with an offer of £26.69 in compensation (the usual "gesture of good will" tosh).  However, there's no mention of my £19 fee for starting the Simple Procedure, so I assume they're hoping I won't realise that isn't included.

 

I also believe the Sherriff's Court would add interest, at about 8%, but truthfully, that's going to be about 40p (though I'm not sure what period it would be applied to).

 

I'm guessing my next step is to get back in touch and say their offer also needs to cover the £19 cost of initiating the Simple Procedure (and maybe also the addition of the interest), so it matches the outcome which the sheriff's court would reach.

 

Edited by Inconvenient
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So, it went like this:

 

I rejected Hermes offer of £26.69 saying:

  • Arguments based on dates in the Hermes contract were unenforceable under UK consumer law
  • I wanted the full value of my claim as per the simple procedure - £26.69 for the game and postage; £19 to cover the costs of simple procedure; interest calculated at the Sherrif Court standard rate
  • Given this was down to the dishonesty and obstructive behaviour from Hermes, I wasn't interested in compromising
  • I wanted confirmation of the payment date, as I expected interest to be paid every day up to that date.

Got a very swift response offering me all that and confirming a payment date a few days later - Interest calculated at 8% per annum (which is what I believe the court standard rate is).

 

I accepted and payment has gone through.

 

So, once again, Hermes will fold if you stick to your guns.  The fact that they try to deter you with their nonsense and make you take them to court is just awful.  Never going to use them again.

 

Interestingly, Hermes say their payment is a "gesture of goodwill" and also ask that I "inform the court that this matter has settled".

 

Looking at the Simple Procedure Advice and the Civilonline system, I can find form 7a, but this seems to be applicable when the respondent (i.e. Hermes) admits the claim.  I'm not sure they have "admitted" anything, so I'm not certain if or how I tell the court I've got my money.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Great result. Well done.

Maybe in Scotland there a bit more sensible than in England.

It would be funny to write back to them and say that as the payment was simply a gesture of goodwill, it was considered to be a free gift and didn't satisfy the judgement.

Other than that, I don't know how you would tell the court that the matter has been settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ring the sheriff's clerk up, they will advise if you need to send a form and which one to discontinue the claim.

Just explain what has happened.

 

They are very good up here in Scotland.

Sx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both - I am amused with the idea of getting back to Hermes.... maybe.

 

They did seem to cave in very quickly - must be simpler in Scotland

 

And I will ring the sherrif's court up - did try earlier, but nobody was around/they were busy on other calls.

 

Thanks for all the advice on this group - it really helped me with the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let us know how you manage it in the end. It's all useful information for other people who visit this forum.

We are very happy to have helped. There is a donation button hanging around here somewhere … 😎

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to EVRi - lost Parcel (Scotland) - SPC Claim Issued **SETTLED**
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...