Jump to content

I'm stuck! Please can you help me with allocation questionnaire???!!!

jules is saving

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5529 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Hi everyone


My case is against Barclays for the sum of just over 2K (inc interest). Story so far is I've sent 1st letter and 2nd letter to Barclays who offered partial settlement (less than half!) which I declined. I've completed money claim on line which has been served. Barclays have entered defence and I've received allocation questionnaire. I am now STUCK on G Other Information! What information should I provide in here? Do I need to re-quote the acts I'm using in support of my claim? Do I need to ask the Court to ask Barclays to give proof of their costs? Or something else??? I'm probably being really thick and have worked myself into a panick for nothing, but I really don't know what I should put. Please can you help me??? Also, has anyone actually had to go to court with Barclays? :confused:


Thanks for any help and advice you can give.



Link to post
Share on other sites

Enter the details below:-


I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track.


This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.


However, the continuing problem is, (in common with the 100s of other cases currently being brought by other bank customers), that the banks refuse to reveal the details of their penalty-charging regime. As the banks have a fiduciary duty towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly and in utmost good faith.


Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. This would bring a rapid end, not only to this litigation, but would also likely bring an end to much of the litigation in progress against other high-street banks.



Don't be like the banks - give a little back



:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D


Link to post
Share on other sites



Im no expert everything i write is what i learnt from my own experience and reading through other threads. Click my scales if you wish to!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites


  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...