Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, do the section 75 chargeback to your credit card provider.
    • See what dx thinks but it seems to me that sending a photo of your own pass isn't relevant to what happened. Let's wait and see what he says. HB
    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bailiffs visit for old lodgers ctax debt - no longer lives here!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 850 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, don't even know if I've posted in the right group. Apologies if it's the wrong one.

 

I own my own property and have a lodger who comes and goes as he has a girlfriend so maybe see him twice a week.

Bailiff has visited today for him for an old council tax debt.

My question is can he still gain entry to my property. 

And how can I stop them from coming to my house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no rights to force entry.

 

You need to speak to your lodger and ask them to contact the council or bailiffs chasing this debt.  This debt won't got away and the sooner the lodger contacts them the better. 

 

If your lodger has been traced to your address, they will continue to hassle you, until the lodger makes contact with them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

no there is no right of forced entry on ctax debt

either ignore them totally or tell them to go away as he moved out xxx date.

 

nothing they can do.

 

if you really want to nail it shut

file a statutory declaration and send it to the council ctax unit.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My lodger contacted them and they demanded full payment to be made by 12pm tomorrow. Or they will come back out apparently.

 

He has spoken to Step Change and they have mentioned something about 60 days 

 

What is a statutory declaration?

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

The enforcement officers (bailffs) can attend an address where the debtor is believed to live, where the debtor may have goods that they can seize that can be sold at auction to cover the debt.

 

The statutory declaration is a sworn declaration that you can make at a local Solicitors saying the debtor does not reside at your address xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and there are no goods belonging to the debtor at your private address xxxxxxxxxx.  The Solcitiors will charge a small fee for doing this.

 

If the debtor does still occasionally live at your address and still has any belongings there, then obviously you cannot make a declation that is false.

 

If your lodger is having problems paying, they should contact the Council and complete a form with their financial information, providing copies of bank statements, plus any wage slips or self employment earnings information.    Even though the Council have passed to Enforcement, they are still responsible for looking into any financial hardship or welfare issues. Your lodger may be entitled to have a backdated Council Tax Benefit claim to be considered.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

we ll they can come all they like , they cant do a thing

if you wish to engage with them do so go outside and lock you door behind you 

film them on your phone telling them you old lodger has not lived there since xyz date, if you have prof of end of tenancy all the better. they also cant do anything to cars that are not his so lookout your v5c if you wish.

99% of what bailiffs state with regard to ctax is all bluff and bluster too!!

who are the bailiff company not ruddy burstow and sutor is it (we call them busted and stupid)

 

a statutory declaration can be made by you at any County court for free, its simply a witness document that state nothing in the property is owned by the old tenant and is all yours. 

 

tell him stop wasting time going to the likes of step change or NDL etc , total waste of time.

he ideally needs to set up a payment arrangement with them, then get the relevant council on board

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Bailiffs visit for old lodgers ctax debt - no longer lives here!

I once assisted a friend's mother by attending her house as Bailiffs were inside.

 

They were seeking payment for a debt of the grand daughter who had lived in a room upstairs.

 

These nasty barstewards were busy taking away items from the Grandmother's living room including a flat screen TV and other valuable furniture, clearly goods not owned by the grand daughter.

 

So yes defo do not let them in.  I believe that if they attend a couple of times and can't get anywhere they return the debt to the Council stating they are unable to enforce.  the council then has to take the next steps whatever they may be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 13/10/2021 at 18:14, indistress said:

 

 

My question is can he still gain entry to my property. 

And how can I stop them from coming to my house.

As you have said in another post, the lodger does live at your property and you see him maybe twice a week. There is therefore no point at all in lying by saying that he has moved out. 

 

Yes, the bailiff may gain entry into your premises BUT can only so so by what is called 'peaceful' means. This usually means by gaining entry through an unlocked door or being invited in.  He is unable to legally force entry. 

 

IF, the bailiff is able to gain 'peaceful' entry, then he may remove goods BELONGING TO THE DEBTOR. The problem is, that he would want to establish which items actually belong to him. 

 

Almost certainly, he should engage with the bailiff. I am unsure what is meant by the reference of 60 days with Stepchange. I would expect that it refers to a period of time before they can assist him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 13/10/2021 at 18:14, indistress said:

I own my own property and have a lodger who comes and goes as he has a girlfriend so maybe see him twice a week.

opps well spotted BA

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Urm... 1st I've ever heard of that one from stepchange..

 

I'm not sure that's correct?

 

Is he saying SC contact ed the bailiff or the council on his behalf and arranged this 60 days?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a similar problem.

It is upto your tennant to sort this. Does he have a mobile number, he really cannot permits bailifs to bang on your door for a debt you don't owe. Tough talk with him is required.

 

 

 

 

 

 

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope wrong.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

i could be but witch part am i wrong on ? 

as them that knock on for tv licence arnt even bailiffs they dont have any powers even when they say im guna causion "anything you do can & will be used lol The warrants they contact police  INCASE THE PERSON KICKS OFF but its a dirty trick , 

 

RECORD IF YOU ANWER THE DOOR HIT RECORD

 

On 15/10/2021 at 09:43, Bailiff Advice said:

As you have said in another post, the lodger does live at your property and you see him maybe twice a week. There is therefore no point at all in lying by saying that he has moved out. 

 

Yes, the bailiff may gain entry into your premises BUT can only so so by what is called 'peaceful' means. This usually means by gaining entry through an unlocked door or being invited in.  He is unable to legally force entry. 

 

IF, the bailiff is able to gain 'peaceful' entry, then he may remove goods BELONGING TO THE DEBTOR. The problem is, that he would want to establish which items actually belong to him. 

 

Almost certainly, he should engage with the bailiff. I am unsure what is meant by the reference of 60 days with Stepchange. I would expect that it refers to a period of time before they can assist him. 

Sorry can i ask if you no the company name or wot the 'Alleged' debt is for ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please use english not text speak.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

STEPCHARGE wots that if you no iv herd of a charge that goes to the victims it made no sence to me lol

 

On 24/10/2021 at 10:25, misschic said:

THATS ONLY IF ITS A HIGH COURT FRIT NOT LIKE THEYL DO IT FOR COUCIAL TAX

Check on Gov.uk/ 

alot of help advice so they say , or if its a C.Tax theres some ways on first choice about debt paying or cant i can give the link if would help , But its only the high court rits its whos name on it

Link to post
Share on other sites

why are you answering your own questions you asked months ago now??

you are talking to yourself??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 23/12/2021 at 12:27, misschic said:

@comebackjimmy If its  council tax owed if he earned a so/so pay or doesn't work , No longer in the property dwp wont pay same with rent if claims benefit at the time , Also worth looking as councils / data protection act would stop some bailiffs asking 

Nonsense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:crazy:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ misschic

 

Can you please stop interfering in the OPs thread.

 

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...