Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax -non migration of DD details


natsmanc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6273 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

I am experiencing massive problems with City of Salford Council Tax.

The story so far:

2 years ago, after getting made redundant, I made arrangements to pay 100.00 per month off my council tax bill (I was in arrears) by direct debit.

 

However, in September, I recieved a letter from City of Salford stating that I had not been payoing my Council Tax bill and had now accrued more arrears amounting in an overall bill of 1900.00!! I was completely shocked as I thought I was paing by DD!

 

I then checked through all of my bank statements and realised that they had stopped tasking the direct debit for 1 year! I rang City of Salford offices straight away and was informed by a membr of staff that they "had not migrated my direct debit details to their new computer system"!

Admittedly I felt a bit stupid as I had not noticed this on any bank statements.

 

I was then advised by the member of staff to put my complaint in writing with an offer of how much I could pay. I did all of this, then a month later they wrote to me asking for Income & Expenditure details for their records so I could prove I could only afford 100.00 a month.

 

I responded straight away and sent the letter by recorded mail and up until today I heard nothing.

 

I recieved a letter this morning requesting 225.00 per month and threatening court action! My I & E details show that I cannot afford anyhing over 100.00, and I made an agreement in principle with an advisor over the phone!

 

This whole mess was caused by them in the first place and now I'm not sure what to do!

 

Can anybody advise me please?

 

Manby Thanks

Nat

LTSB -claiming back WON!!!

 

Mint credit card - WON!!!

 

Morgan Stanley credit card - WON!!!

 

LTSB credit card - MCOL issued WON!!

 

Barclaycard - MCOL issued for balance of partial refund 200.00

 

Gorvins Solicitors - WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well firstly you cannot hold them solely responsible for this - regardless of the direct debit issue, you didn't make any payments for 12 months, and did not make any efforts to pay by any other method. It would also be your responsibility to ensure the £100 was leaving your account each month and to query it if this did not take place.

 

In the circumstances, I would send a letter along the following lines:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Acc/Ref No XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Thank you for your letter of XXXXXX. I am very disappointed that we seem unable to reach a satisfactory compromise in this case.

 

As I have already explained, I can only afford £100 per month at the present time. This is the only realistic payment proposal bearing in mind the enclosed personal budget sheet.

 

You have stated in correspondence your intention to commence proceedings in the county court against us. The commencement of legal proceedings under such circumstances could be counter to the ‘Overriding Objectives’ of the new Civil Procedure Rules. You will be aware that the Overriding Objectives underpin everything the court does. Moreover, paragraph 4 of the Protocols Practice Direction states that in cases not covered by an approved pre−action protocol, the court will expect the parties “to act reasonably…….. In trying to avoid the necessity for the start of proceedings”.

 

We would suggest that your refusal to accept our offer could be viewed as unreasonable and we would ask the court to consider this matter with reference to the Overriding Objectives.

 

The offer of £100 is of course still open to you to accept.

 

Yours faithfully

  • Haha 1

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Barracad

 

Thanks for the excellent letter template & advice.

 

I understand that I am partly to blame.

I am also annoyed because they never acknowledged my I & E details, and I had also made an agreement to pay 100.00. Apparently they are inundated with complaints from people like myself, one of which is my mother.

 

Since this has come to light I have been using internet banking and checking my statements daily.

 

Thanks again

 

Nat

LTSB -claiming back WON!!!

 

Mint credit card - WON!!!

 

Morgan Stanley credit card - WON!!!

 

LTSB credit card - MCOL issued WON!!

 

Barclaycard - MCOL issued for balance of partial refund 200.00

 

Gorvins Solicitors - WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

God I thoug it was only me that the direct debit issue had happened to. I experienced the same thing with my council which South Lakeland District Coucil.

I was nursing my Grandmother looking after 2 kids and had been into see them to set up the direct debit mandate. After 6 months I was checking my bank statements and thought why hasn't the council tax gone out so I phoned them. They had lost my mandate during processing. I was in arrears of £630.00. A new arrangement was set up to take the money from my bank.

 

I still have arrears on my account after 3 years I can never pay enough just to clear it in full. I work full time and bring up 2 kids but to the council I earn enough money to pay this years and the arrears a £283.00 per month. Yet I know people who owe thousand and pay £1 - £2.00 per week.

 

Yes it was my fault also but why did they wait 6 months before they told me.

 

I have every sympathy with you and hope you can get them to accept a lower payment.

 

All the best.

 

Citi settled =£252 :-)

Monument settled = £253 :-)

Capital 1 settled = £295 :-)

GMAC ERC = £1811.13 :-)

Lloyds Tsb = Moneyclaim form sent for £1343 4th Dec 2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lainynic

 

Good luck with sorting it out with the council today

 

 

Nat

LTSB -claiming back WON!!!

 

Mint credit card - WON!!!

 

Morgan Stanley credit card - WON!!!

 

LTSB credit card - MCOL issued WON!!

 

Barclaycard - MCOL issued for balance of partial refund 200.00

 

Gorvins Solicitors - WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The folk who were jailed were handled in this way because of their refusal to pay the Tax because of some injustice. This is not the case here, and if the Council were collecting the funds then ceased due to their error, there is not only cause for complaint, but justification for a claim of compensation due to the council's error.

 

Clearly there is a responsibility on the tax-payer to pay his taxes, but the council cannot pursue anyone for non paypment if they had the tools to effect payment and did not (through their error) collect it. As council's can usually obtain a warrant of default automatically, it is important to ensure that you advise them you wish to be formally advised of any court dates in order to arrange a defence to be lodged. This way, you can often go straight to a resolution (and compensation) without it being formally called.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Buzby,

 

I was not aware that I would be able to claim compensatiuon! Not sure how I would go about this.

 

Many Thanks

 

Natalie

LTSB -claiming back WON!!!

 

Mint credit card - WON!!!

 

Morgan Stanley credit card - WON!!!

 

LTSB credit card - MCOL issued WON!!

 

Barclaycard - MCOL issued for balance of partial refund 200.00

 

Gorvins Solicitors - WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not a foregone conclusion, but in cases where their incompetence is proved, it is often possible to get a rebate (for example, a single person's allowance for council tax can be 25% or second home discount at 50%). Check what these are and when seeking satisfaction for their error - after all, you DID give them free access to your bank account, they have a responsibility to take these payments correctly and timeously. If I was in your situation, I'd suggest to them that they had the moral responsibility to process your payments timeously. As they did not, you will exceptionally agree to them being paid late, however, as an incentive for them not to put you in this situation again, you request that you receive one of the discounts previously mentioned for the months where the payments were NOT taken. If they don't agree, you will show your offer to a Judge in mitigation of their demand, should they decide to go for legal enforcement!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt very much that they will apply a discount on a property when it doesn't fall into the criteria I would think that they would have to be forced to pay compensation not break the rules for the SPD 2AR or any other exemption.

 

Still make sure that any court fees and/or liability orders you may incur will be refunded as this should not get to a summons stage as you are willing to make some form of payment, in fact if you still haven't made a payment due to them dragging their feet, make one so it looks like you are trying.

 

Direct your letters to the Director of Finance and ask to go through the Income and Expenditure Process failing this your MP failing this the LGO but all the while make your own I&E sheet (you can include such things as other debt, credit card and catalogues repayments along with normal bills, money for clothes, toiletries, travel etc.) and make payments every month of what you are propsing.

  • Haha 1

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cheddar

 

I have done the I&E and have been paying them 100.00 for 3 months now.

I recieved another letter from them yesterday which really wound me up.

They said 100.00 was "unnacceptable" because "Council Tax is a priority debt and more important than loans, credit cards and bills etc" and, they are "prepared to accept a temporary arrangement of 200.00 per month".

 

Surely it is not their right to decide which of my debts are a priority!?

If it wasn't for their new computer system, I would not be in this mess!!

 

I didnt sleep last night because of this

LTSB -claiming back WON!!!

 

Mint credit card - WON!!!

 

Morgan Stanley credit card - WON!!!

 

LTSB credit card - MCOL issued WON!!

 

Barclaycard - MCOL issued for balance of partial refund 200.00

 

Gorvins Solicitors - WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, they have no right to an I&E and I'm surprised you agreed to do this. What you have to remember at all times is you are in this situation because of THEIR error, not yours, therefore you e looking to THEM for a resolution you can work with, not the other way around.

 

It is important that you make payments to account for the current months and battle it out for the arrears. I'd respond by saying to them they owed a duty of care to you - and as you had arranged your affairs to permit them access to the relevant funds, have to accept respoonsibility for their error.

 

As to cheddar's comment - each Council has discretion about how they resolve an issue like this, the point being made that just because it is a 'Property-type A' it does not automatically mean the council receive the stated amount each year, it can and does alter depending on individual circumstances - their previous error being WHOLLY their fault, and the tax payer should not be inconvenienced unduly by their stupidity.

 

In any communications, take the offensive, it was their error that started this, they have no right to dictate terms on a I&E, and you'll refer their incompetence to the Local Government Ombudsman and your MP if you do not receive satisfaction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just phoned them and asked to speak to Mrs Kilner who signed the letter but they wouldnt put me through. The girl I spoke to wouldnt comment on the problem with the direct debit being their fault, I think the telephone staff have been told to keep tight lipped about it. I've been doing my research and this was a massive problem all over Salford for Council Tax customers and it even made it to the front pages of our local paper!

Anyway, the girl told me that they probably wont accept 100.00, but they would probably accept my offer if it is a bit higher. I told her 100.00 was my offer and that is that.

She has put a messgae out for a manager to call me ASAP. I told her that if I dont hear anything today that I will be there first thing in the morning.

I also mentioned that I will be writing to my local MP, lodging a complaint with the ombudsman and I'm seeking legal advice.

I also told her that I will be writing to Salford Advertiser - our local paper.

 

I am seriously annoyed!

LTSB -claiming back WON!!!

 

Mint credit card - WON!!!

 

Morgan Stanley credit card - WON!!!

 

LTSB credit card - MCOL issued WON!!

 

Barclaycard - MCOL issued for balance of partial refund 200.00

 

Gorvins Solicitors - WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the article in the local paper

 

 

The £2.5M council tax black hole

 

THE amount of council tax Salford City Council failed to collect has risen by more than £2.5 million in 12 months.

During the last financial year, Salford left £8,661,000 of council tax uncollected compared to £5,993,000 in 2004/05 - an increase of £2,668,000.

Town hall bosses claim a new computer system is responsible for a figure which places the city at the bottom of a table of the 36 authorities in the north west.

Advertisement

 

 

 

Conservative Councillor Karen Garrido said: "I’m absolutely appalled.

"It’s absolutely awful and we’ve got to start collecting it. We need to start sending out reminders earlier and if people are in difficulty they need to come and talk to the council.

"It’s an absolute disgrace and we need to start getting the money in because it affects everything we do."

Lib Dem Councillor Norman Owen said: "When we’ve got services like children's services in dire need of investment we can’t afford to be falling short in our council tax collections.

"Now I’m on the budget committee I will be keeping a sharper eye on the situation."

A spokesperson for Salford City Council said: "Last year we introduced a new computer-based system to help us improve on council tax collection.

"However, getting used to new ways of working takes time and that did mean a temporary delay in recovering outstanding payments.

"We have made a good start this financial year though and already in the first half of the year we have collected as much in arrears as in the whole of 2005/06.

"We wish to assure residents that we will persist in chasing any remaining outstanding debts."

In Manchester the amount uncollected rose by £1,835,000 and across the north west there was an increase for 23 councils. Across Great Britain the amount uncollected was £738 million compared to £742.7 million in 2004/2005.

Kathryn Ryan

 

First published by the Salford Advertise

LTSB -claiming back WON!!!

 

Mint credit card - WON!!!

 

Morgan Stanley credit card - WON!!!

 

LTSB credit card - MCOL issued WON!!

 

Barclaycard - MCOL issued for balance of partial refund 200.00

 

Gorvins Solicitors - WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's it - just keep on the pressure. If you could be accused of avoiding your civic responsibilities, then there would be an explanation for heavy-handed tactic, but as you weren't, they've got the problem and have to find an amicible work-around. Keep us posted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep going for it, as for what comes in what order it is correct that CT has a high priority the CAB will tell you this but if you can't afford something you can't afford it, and especially when error lies with the LA.

 

Contact your MP here WriteToThem.com - Email or fax your Councillor, MP, MEP, MSP or Welsh, NI, London Assembly Member for free before going through the LGO.

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's some good advice in this thread. In addition, have you considered contacting your local councillor about this? He/she has an obligation to work on behalf of his/her electorate, and given that he/she will be in contact with the officers very regularly it may get things moving along. If your councillor is from the party in power, he or she will be keen for this not to be widely publicised, especially given the previous embarrassment surrounding council tax. If he/she is from the opposition, they'll be keen to make a big fuss about this, which will probably result in a swift solution.

Gruffle Gaw vs Halifax - £1531.50: ***WON - cheque for £1966.78 received 30/09/06***:)

I'm not a legal professional and my advice is given without prejudice or liability.

If you found my post helpful, please click the scales on the left.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gruffle Gaw

 

Thanks for the advice everyone.

Any ideas what I should write to the councillor?

LTSB -claiming back WON!!!

 

Mint credit card - WON!!!

 

Morgan Stanley credit card - WON!!!

 

LTSB credit card - MCOL issued WON!!

 

Barclaycard - MCOL issued for balance of partial refund 200.00

 

Gorvins Solicitors - WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just explain that the council, having been given unrestricted access to your bank account chose not to take the amounts due to them and have made intolerable demands to make up for uncollected payments that were the council's error. Whilst you have no objection whatsoever in paying your taxes as they fell due, the council - despite its maladministration of your Council Tax account, is seeking payments far in excess of what you can afford to make up the difference. With the council being unsympathetic to your plight, you hope your councillor's intervention will make the Finance Department see sense, and acknowledge it shortcomings - and take its responsibilities ro residents seriously.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Buzby thats great

LTSB -claiming back WON!!!

 

Mint credit card - WON!!!

 

Morgan Stanley credit card - WON!!!

 

LTSB credit card - MCOL issued WON!!

 

Barclaycard - MCOL issued for balance of partial refund 200.00

 

Gorvins Solicitors - WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gruffle Gaw

 

Thanks for the advice everyone.

Any ideas what I should write to the councillor?

 

You can either write (what buzby suggested should do the trick) or just give the councillor a ring. Here's a list of your councillors, broken down by ward: Councillors by ward

 

Just choose the one that represents the ward closest to where you live and click on his or her name. Contact details, including an address and telephone number, will come up. I'm sure they'll be happy to help - that's what they're elected to do.

  • Haha 1

Gruffle Gaw vs Halifax - £1531.50: ***WON - cheque for £1966.78 received 30/09/06***:)

I'm not a legal professional and my advice is given without prejudice or liability.

If you found my post helpful, please click the scales on the left.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've contacted my councillor through the write to your MP/councillor link suggested earlier in the thread and he told me it's better to contact them directly because it takes less time to get the email that way.

 

Also, I think it would be worth mentioning that you know others, like your mother, have had the same problems - if he thinks the issue is affecting a lot of his electorate that will be even more reason to act.

Gruffle Gaw vs Halifax - £1531.50: ***WON - cheque for £1966.78 received 30/09/06***:)

I'm not a legal professional and my advice is given without prejudice or liability.

If you found my post helpful, please click the scales on the left.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...