Jump to content


VCS/ELMS PCN PAPLOC now claimform - No Stopping - John Lennon Liverpool Airport


Recommended Posts

Hi again, 

 

with the CPR31:14 request, for my case would it just be 3 things I’m requesting?

1. Contract between vcs and landowner 

2. proof of planning permission for signage

3. Copies of NTD/NTK & other correspondence 

 

thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

send it as is

they never reply anyway.

 

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

scan everything yo one mass PDF please 

read our upload guide carefully

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive removed lots of duplicates in the pdf

check its all there please.

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

a long way ahead

if you look at JLA no stopping claimform threads that are at the WS stage, you will see that contract has been ripped apart already.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

std 3-5 line generic non give away defence ......post it here 1st.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence :

 

1. No keeper liability as this is not “relevant land” under the POFA 2012 and I the defendant puts it to strict proof that VCS show as to who was the driver at the time.

2. No contract was ever offered by VCS, land is subject to own byelaws and signage is prohibitive so there can be no monies due as a result of either a contractual charge or as a result of a breach of contract.


 

is that enough?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No!

 

Not because what you've written is wrong - it isn't - but because it's best to keep Simple Simon in the dark about how you are going to bat off his claim.

 

Look at

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/393251-received-a-court-claim-from-a-private-parking-speculative-invoice-how-to-deal-with-it-hereupdated-jun-2021/

 

and then scroll down to

 

Q2) How should I defend?

 

Adapt the defence there.

 

The more you read up on VCS "no stopping" airport threads here the more you'll educate yourself on what needs to be done.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.  It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of xxxxxxx

 

2.   As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.  The proper claimant is the landowner

 

3.  It is denied that the Defendant breached any terms and conditions set on private land.

 

4.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant, or broke any such contract.

 

5.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.

 

do I need to be more specific about the PoC or leave that for WS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fine Flamjam.

 

Well done on reading up and understanding the legal arguments against Simon (post 39).  That will stand you in good stead later on when you prepare your WS.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi again all, 

 

quick update..

 

last week I received the N180 directions questionnaire forms to be completed by 23rd December.. 

Also today I received a letter from VCS advising me that ELMS Legal are no longer acting on their behalf, also offering me a chance to settle for £185 within 14 days

 

1. Do I complete the forms and send via email or post?

2. What do I do with the letter from VCS? 
Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

in 2 weeks youve not even bothered too nor have been self helping?....You only need read just about any other pcn claimform thread....

 

On 30/11/2021 at 00:48, FTMDave said:

 

The more you read up on VCS "no stopping" airport threads here the more you'll educate yourself on what needs to be done.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi again all, 

 

quick update.

received letter today stating my claim hearing will be on 11 May 2022 at 10:00am. Partied shall by 4pm on the 23 February 2022 file at court and serve on each other. Claimant has until 4pm on 13 April 2022 to pay trial fee.

 

I’ll get my WS drafted and uploaded shortly

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm at work at the moment but promise to have a look over it late this evening.

 

Have you checked if Simple Simon has paid the hearing fee?  If not, give the court a quick ring.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you've written is great, you've researched excellently.

 

Personally I would tweak it and put headings for the various sections so the judge will see instantly the legal arguments you're making.  That can be done a bit later.

 

What I think is more of a problem is that you jump from one legal argument to another and back again.  The arguments should be grouped

 

1-4 , leave as they are

5, concerns keeper liability

5.1, 5.2, 6, concerns prohibition

5.3, concerns bye-laws

7, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, concern locus standi

From 8 to the end is fine.

 

Please do some of this moving around and then we can tweak further.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes rearranging as per FTMDaves suggestion is logical, it stops the Judge having to go backwards and forwards through the WS like a grasshopper, puts it all nice and linear.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...