Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

VCS/ELMS PCN PAPLOC now claimform - No Stopping - John Lennon Liverpool Airport


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 179 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, 

 

I received this letter after ignoring all previous letters. Firstly they wanted payment before the date on the letter itself. 
I have requested SAR from VCS and I’m in process of emailing ELMS to deny the debt. 
what else do I need to do please, I’ve read a few posts that mention bylaws ? But I’m not sure which bylaws apply

Any advice would be appreciated. 
thanks 

10,01,2021-11:15:34:am.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Date of the infringement

16/03/2018
 

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]

Unsure awaiting SAR 
 

[scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide]

please do not put JPG Picture files into your post

 

3 Date received

Unknown 
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]

Unsure 

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

Yes, it was a spy car I believe 
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]

no
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

N/A
 

7 Who is the parking company?

VCS

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

LIVERPOOL JLA
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

Unsure 

 

Answered best I could without having any documents to hand 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to VCS/ELMS PCN PAPLOC - John Lennon Liverpool Airport
  • dx100uk changed the title to VCS/ELMS PCN PAPLOC - No Stopping - John Lennon Liverpool Airport
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi
sorry for lack of replies/updates. I’ve been on holiday since 5/10 and only due back home tomorrow 26/10.

I didn’t send the snotty letter before I went on holiday, I’m guessing it’s too late to do when I get back? If so what are my options now?

apologies once again for not following advice given

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to VCS/ELMS PCN PAPLOC now claimform - No Stopping - John Lennon Liverpool Airport

Name of the Claimant :VCS

 

Claimants Solicitors: ELMS LEGAL

 

Date of issue – 3rd Nov 2021

 

Date for AOS - 22 Nov 2021

 

Date to submit Defence - 3 December 2021

 

 

 

What is the claim for – 

 

1.breach of contract for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land.

 

2.Defendants vehicle was identified in Liverpool John Lennon Airport on 16/03/2018 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited .

 

3.At all material times the defendant was the registered keeper and/or the driver. The terms and conditions upon entering private lane were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct.

 

4.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply, namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability.

 

5.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice , contractual costs and interest

 

 

 

What is the value of the claim?

 

 

Amount Claimed £160

court fees £35

legal rep fees £50

Total Amount  £245

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again, 

 

with the CPR31:14 request, for my case would it just be 3 things I’m requesting?

1. Contract between vcs and landowner 

2. proof of planning permission for signage

3. Copies of NTD/NTK & other correspondence 

 

thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Defence :

 

1. No keeper liability as this is not “relevant land” under the POFA 2012 and I the defendant puts it to strict proof that VCS show as to who was the driver at the time.

2. No contract was ever offered by VCS, land is subject to own byelaws and signage is prohibitive so there can be no monies due as a result of either a contractual charge or as a result of a breach of contract.


 

is that enough?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.  It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of xxxxxxx

 

2.   As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.  The proper claimant is the landowner

 

3.  It is denied that the Defendant breached any terms and conditions set on private land.

 

4.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant, or broke any such contract.

 

5.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.

 

do I need to be more specific about the PoC or leave that for WS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi again all, 

 

quick update..

 

last week I received the N180 directions questionnaire forms to be completed by 23rd December.. 

Also today I received a letter from VCS advising me that ELMS Legal are no longer acting on their behalf, also offering me a chance to settle for £185 within 14 days

 

1. Do I complete the forms and send via email or post?

2. What do I do with the letter from VCS? 
Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi again all, 

 

quick update.

received letter today stating my claim hearing will be on 11 May 2022 at 10:00am. Partied shall by 4pm on the 23 February 2022 file at court and serve on each other. Claimant has until 4pm on 13 April 2022 to pay trial fee.

 

I’ll get my WS drafted and uploaded shortly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again all, 

 

Received a letter yesterday, offering me final chance to settle for £192.50 payable in 14 days, if I don’t they will seek further costs of £220 for a local solicitor…

 

also received their WS today, I’ll get that uploaded later before I make the advised changes to my WS 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, lookinforinfo said:

 

 

 

WWW.LIVERPOOLAIRPORT.COM

Welcome to the official Liverpool John Lennon Airport website - connecting Liverpool and the North West with the world.

 

Should I include this in my WS, bearing in mind Ancala made the purchase after my PCN was issued ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...