Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
    • At a key lecture in the City of London, the shadow chancellor will also vow to reform the Treasury.View the full article
    • Despite controversy China's Temu is becoming a global online shopping force.View the full article
    • The retailer has come under fire for an advert showing motorcyclists wearing trainers and doing wheelies.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Daughter called into meeting questioned about 2nd job why she not made employer aware/conflict of interest Employer asking for email when 2nd job started hours etc and access to her phone


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 908 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughters manager called her into meeting and told her they have been made aware/brought to their attention my daughter has a 2nd job (outside of work hours) and  this is a conflict of interest because her contract states she must tell the employer of any 2nd employment she has. My daughter confirmed to the employer she has a 2nd job.

He employer is now wanting my daughter to send an email to include the following

 

1. Name of employer

2. When she started work and how many hours a week she is working

3. Why she started the 2nd job(outside of work hours and due to debt)

4. Why she never told the employer (my daughter said she was not aware/did not throroughly read the contract given over 10 years)

 

My daughter is working a few hours here and there for uber so all data on her phone

 

The employer is asking to go through my daughters phone to check the start date of employment, how much she is getting paid etc, can her employer do this?

My daughter needs to send her employer an email by tommorow, what does she need to add to the email?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they need to check that over the two jobs she isn't breaching the working time directive. Also that she has no conflict of interest between the employers.

 

I cant see a reason for needing the pay rate.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Homer67 said:

As we are no longer EU members I don't believe the EWTD has to apply.

 

The government disagrees with you

 

WWW.GOV.UK

Working time directive and maximum weekly working hours including how to calculate your weekly working hours and working time limits if you're a...

 

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Emmzzi said:

 

The government disagrees with you

 

WWW.GOV.UK

Working time directive and maximum weekly working hours including how to calculate your weekly working hours and working time limits if you're a...

 

No it doesn't: You can choose to work more by opting out of the 48-hour week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP does not state an opt out has been signed. It therefore seems more likely that it has not, and the regulations apply retrospectively, so they need to check for breaches.

 

See also ACAS

 

WWW.ACAS.ORG.UK

How many hours an employee can work each week.

 

If an employer finds out their employee has another job

The employer must make sure their employee is not working more than an average 48 hours a week in total across both jobs.

Example

Tracey works an average of 30 hours a week in a factory. This week, she tells the factory manager that she has also started working 20 hours a week in a cafe.

The manager tells Tracey she risks working more hours than the legal limit. Therefore Tracey must either reduce her total working hours to below 48, or agree to opt out of the weekly limit. 

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A second job is 99% of the time reportable to main employers, because there are so many potential issues.

 

Not just a conflict of interest in some cases.

 

But could also present a health & safety issue for some jobs.  If someone was regularly driving for Uber at night and operating machinery the next day, the H&S risk would need to be considered.

 

Covid risk - Carrying passengers in a car for journeys and then going into an office the next day.   This would need to be considered by an employers, as  having many strangers in a car for periods of time and then coming into an office, is probably something the employers would not be happy with, if they had been told.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Daughters employer has sent an email stating....now youve confirmed your working for a courier company, please provide

 

1. Name of courier company

2. when work commenced with company?

3. How many hours a week you have/intend to work with them?  (no fixed hours/self employed)

4. What are your working hours with the company? (no fixed hours/self employed)

 

Is my daughters reply in bold for questions 3 and 4 o..k? as the nature of her 2nd job means the courier company does not provided fixed working hours or days a week. You get what hours given and upto you if you decide to take the work or not

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think she needs to tell them week by week how many hours she has done so they can check for that 48hour max. She's being too vague for them to be able to agree the work is ok. Being reticent won't help the situation; honest and open is the way to go.

 

Is there any driving involved in her main employment?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

week by week hours vary so she can't give an approx figure.

her work have said they want to make sure she is not working too many hours and it doesn;t effect her own work.

 

no driving in her main job

Edited by linzie
Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't need an approximate figure for past hours worked. They need an actual. She will know what she has worked in the past, surely?

 

And for the future hours per week, the answer needs to be a number which adds up with her first job hours to under 48! She needs to say something like "I do about 10 hours a week for them."

 

Vague answers are the surest way to ensure permission is withheld,  and make them want to investigate this breach of contract. Specific, open and honest....

Edited by Emmzzi

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, linzie said:

can her work place ask to see phone with the driving app she works for?

 

They can ask, she can refuse, and they can choose to draw their own conclusions from that. If they have a reasonable belief she's doing an unsafe amount of hours elsewhere they could go down a dismissal route.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

"3. How many hours a week you have/intend to work with them?" has a past tense in it to my eye.

 

Anyway - that's the best legal advice I have at this point. Good luck to her and let us know how she gets on.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...