Jump to content


CCJ Set aside - Drydens/Arrow


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 916 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm challenging a CCJ issued by Arrow Global/Drydens in 2018.

The CCJ was issued whilst i was working overseas and was unable to challenge.

I found out about the CCJ last year when i applied for a property to rent and was obviously rejected and lost the deposit.

The debt is statute barred due to age.

The court date for hearing is this week 1st Sept.

I've now received a message from Drydens saying they will not be contesting. The form they want me to sign has a "No order as to costs" element.

 

The questions I have are:

1) Should i pursue for costs?

2) Should i have itemised those costs when i made the application to set aside? and if so, will the court ignore any requests for costs?

 

Thank you all in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But you paid the fee? £100 or£ 255? 

 

so the debt was already statute barred when the claimform was issued if so guarantee d win for you

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What form do they wish you to sign .....a Tomlin Order ? 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be vary wary with Drydens, as a Tomlin still means you pay the original SB debt

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its a Tomlin Order to set a side by consent...then there is no judgment to pay...the CCJ is set a side BN

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy, was looking at wrong context where it keeps a judgment at bay if an agreed amount paid

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the comments so far.

 

Just to clarify - in 2018 when the case was heard, the debt was already statute barred by 2 years. As i was unable to challenge, the ccj was issued by default.

Now that i am challenging, I think they've realised they have a very weak case and have decided not to challenge.

The form they want me to sign is a "Consent Order" (to save as to costs).

 

In peoples opinion (and yes im aware the courts can go in any direction), would costs be awarded to me for recovery of filing charges (£255) and loss of rental deposit (£300)?

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

In peoples opinion (and yes im aware the courts can go in any direction), would costs be awarded to me for recovery of filing charges (£255) and loss of rental deposit (£300)?

 

What connection has that to the claim and default judgment by Arrow Global/Drydens in 2018 ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not costs...but losses...you would have to issue your own claim against Arrow Global/Drydens for the losses incurred.

They would probably defend and state that you failed to advise them you had moved abroad and informed them of your current address ?

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...