Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCJ and student visa application


richie2020
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 960 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I defaulted a loan repayment and unfortunately, a court case was filed a week before I got in contact with the bank to re-negotiate for a new payment plan and amount for which I have been adhering for the past 4 months.

 

Recently I received a letter from the court in relation to the loan. My problem is, I'm about to apply for a student visa for my wife and I want to go with her as a dependant.

 

Will the letter from the court on my part affect the visa application? I fear if I declare it will rather raise a red flag as I see loan default as not a criminal offense but a civil one and if I don't will the UK home office find out? Your suggestions will be highly appreciated. Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
Format
Link to post
Share on other sites

Who gor the ccj why did you bot defend it?!?!

 

Immaterial to a visa totally. Debt is not a crime in the uk but the scammer dca that took you to court is the criminal here

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just type no need to keep hitting quote

 

CCJ's are nothing serious to do with visa applications, debt in the UK is NOT a CRIMINAL MATTER, its a civil matter and the forms mention nothing about civil court matters nor debt.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for the response. The application is confusing because the question asks "At any time have you ever had any of the following, in the UK or any other country?" and one of the bullet point was a civil court judgement, for example, non-payment of debt. So I should answer no then?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you contacted the claimant and sorted this out before judgement was granted time, they should have discontinued the case.

who was the claimant/the bank you owed the money too?

did they make you sign one of forms from the court you got?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made contact with them (ie bank) to explain to them my reason for the default  but unfortunately they had already filled a court case against me.

 

I was able to re-negotiate a new payment plan with them for which i have been paying for the past 4 months now and this month will be the 5th month.

 

I even paid 3 times the agreed amount in the first month to reduce the debt and also show my commitment and also asked them if they can do something about the court case and they told me as long as i fulfill my part of the obligation I should not worry

 

  but I still received a letter from the court relating to the loan a few weeks ago even though I already have an agreement with them. I checked my criminal records and everything is clean so far

1. who was the claimant/the bank you owed the money too? Mbank in Czech Republic

2. did they make you sign one of forms from the court you got? No forms was signed.

 

Edited by dx100uk
added A few blank lines only..dx
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ccjs are not criminal wont show there

go get your credit file

 

credit karma etc

 

see if it shows please

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...