Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other!
    • Six months of conflict have also taken a heavy economic toll.View the full article
    • the Town and Country [advertisments ] Regulations 2007 are not easy to understand. Most Council planing officials don't so it's good that you found one who knows. Although he may not have been right if the rogues have not been "controlling" in the car park for that long. The time only starts when the ANPR signs go up, not how long the area has been used as a car park.   Sadly I have checked Highview out and they have been there since at least 2014 . I have looked at the BPA Code of Practice version 8 which covers 2023 and that states Re Consideration and Grace Periods 13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN. It then goes on to explain a bit more further down 13.5 You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is. 13.6 Neither a consideration period or a grace period are periods of free parking and there is no requirement for you to offer an additional allowance on top of a consideration or grace period. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________So you have  now only overstayed 5 minutes maximum since BPA quote a minimum of 10 minutes. And it may be that the Riverside does have a longer period perhaps because of the size of the car park? So it becomes even more incumbent on you to remember where the extra 5 minutes could be.  Were you travelling as a family with children or a disabled person where getting them in and out of the car would take longer. Was there difficulty finding a space, or having to queue to get out of the car park . Or anything else that could account for another 5 minutes  without having to claim the difference between the ANPR times and the actual times.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

mackenzie hall


sonnab
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6346 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hiya ive just recieved 3 red postcards through the door from mackenzie hall for 3 different account from one catalogue J D WILLIAMS ive jut spokes to a les hume who has said that they have no further details about these account only that they are for an address that i havent lived at for 19mths ive asked if i could set up a payment plan and she advised me that they do not make payment arrangements they are here to collect the debt in full she said that she would hold the account untill the 12th of december then i should ring up again and make payment ive told her that i only get £179 a week child tax credit because they dont want to know about my husbands wage but she never asked about it so what do i now do i cant pay it in full the 3 accounts come to a totall of £420.18 which i am willing to pay but i just cant pay it in full on tuesday are they likely to whack a load of charges onto these debts ive never had any dealings with mackenzie hall i dont know how they work if they are like any other dca i can see me paying through the nose just to get them off my back

any responses would be gratefully received

:mad:

:psonnab :p
Link to post
Share on other sites

First off how old are these debts? If its over 6 years and you haven't acknowledged them they become stature barred. Check this first.

 

In any case don't worry, work out what you can afford and offer them that. There was a budget planner in this forum but the link seems to be dead. But it's fairly easy, take your income, subtract the essentials (rent/mortage, bills, food, clothes etc) and offer them the remainder, even if its only £1/week. Don't give them any more than you that that or you're more likely to miss a payment at some point and end up with them giving you more hassle. Do it in writing, it's harder for them to bully you into paying more plus you have a record of everything. You can insist they stop phoning you and if they continue, report them for harrassment.

 

As for charges I don't know if they will try and add them on. Even if they do odds are they will be unlawful. Same goes for any charges the catalogue company may have applied to you accounts. You should ask for a full statement of account so you know where you stand, for the catalogue company though you will probably have to send a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) as with bank charges.

 

There are plenty of other threads in this forum relating to this company (eg http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-bailiffs-advice/2039-mackenzie-hall-do-any.html) so have a read through them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don#t offer them anything until they proved this debt. You would tell a mugger to get lost if he demanded money in the street so why should you accept the word of a company that have been shown time and time again on this forum to be shady characters.

 

Write to them, don't ever phone them, and tell them you do not acknowledge any debt to them or any company they may represent. Send them the CCA letter which will require them to send you the appropriate documents - a signed, true copy of the agreement they claim exists, a deed of assignment (their right to collect) and a statement of account. Send it recorded delivery so you have proof it was sent and proof it was received.

 

They have 12 working days to comply. After that they cannot take any action until they come up with the proof, and even then they would need the permission of a judge. If their failure to comply with your requests lasts for a month after the 12-day time scale is up they commit a criminal offence. They wouldstill need a court order to take action but they wouldn't be so foolish as to place their heads in the firing line and allow a judge to have a go at them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the replies the debts are under six years so i cant do the barred thingy,but ive printed out ready to post tomorrow a cca to mackenzie hall and an SRA to jdwilliams the catalogue that the debts come from but as far as i can see ive only got 2 accounts with jdwilliams but MH are saying that there is 3 debts from them but hopefully i will see where the other comes from with the SAR alo ive drafted this quick letter to MH as follows

 

Dear sirs

 

accounts xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx

 

After speaking to one of your call centre personell today,i have written to jd williams asking for information under the data protection act,and as this debt is in dispute,you are not permitted to contact me again to pursue this debt untill the situation is settled,if however you do i will have no option but to report you to the office of fair trading

 

yours faithfully

 

 

misses peed off with underhand tactics

 

 

 

 

hopefully this will keep them of my back for a couple of weeks but i doubt it

 

is this draft ok if it is ill send that one aswell tomorrow

:psonnab :p
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
its the one in scottland

 

Only looking on companies house website I noticed that they are exempt from issuing full accounts which I beleive is for turnover under 100k the reason I asked is because the MH in london hasn't filed any accounts for nearly 2 years and if you look at the Mercers thread a few threads down a little bit of investigation has proved that some of these DCA's are not above board.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...