Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Applying for CCJ removal - Parking eye


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 995 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, 

 

Back in 2019 parking eye issued a CCJ against me, I paid this off in 2020 and it is now showing as satisfied on my credit file - I am guessing after reading over this forum it will remain there until 2025 once the 6 years have passed. 

 

I have been working over the past year to gather information to present to the courts to have the CCJ removed, to cut a very long story short ( 2017 - 2020 to be exact) I tried to set up a repayment plan with parking to pay the £100 fine for the ticket, they refused this on 3 occasions and in emails stated that in order to set up a repayment plan I would need to submit a claim form which they will review and come to a decision. 

They sent numerous emails saying that they refuse to communicate with me further, they allegedly posted the court forms which I never received and I asked for a copy via email - this request was ignored by them and the CCJ was issued. 

 

I paid the £197 to them in 2020 to cover the fine and the charges for the court fees - the happily set up a repayment plan for this via email.

 

I recently sent them a complaint via letter and with this I asked for all copies of letters and emails to be sent to me, the have ignored my complaint but issued the requested paperwork, amongst this is 3 letters agreeing the initial repayment plan that I tried to set up back in 2017 - considering all communication was done via email and I have emails from them stating that all repayment plans must be submitted by claim form I am confused as to where these 3 letters have come from, they were never sent via post. What is even more confusing is they sent an email agreeing the £197 repayment and not letter - surely they would be consistent with the way they send information? 

 

Has anyone been successful with having a CCJ removed? what information should I present to the courts? 

 

I do feel with the lack of consistency on their part and the fact I never received the court forms I could stand a chance with the courts agreeing and it being removed but I am unsure. 

 

Any help is greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are mandatory reasons why a set-aside should be granted, but the situation you describe doesn’t fall within those.

 

So, you’d have to ask for a discretionary set-aside.

a) these need to be applied for ‘promptly’

b) if you paid it off, rather than applying for a set-aside, you’d be hard pushed to persuade the court you didn’t owe it.

 

This late, and having paid it off rather than asking for the set-aside previously, you have 2 hopes. “Bob Hope and no hope. Further, Bob Hope is deceased”

 

You’d have to pay an application fee (if not fee exempt), and I think it’d be a waste of time, for the reasons stated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply. 

 

I have read some information on applying to have a ccj set-aside and one of the reasons you could potentially have it set aside is because you did not receive the original paperwork which I have emails dating back to 2018 which state I never received the paperwork and I did ask parking eye for another copy to be issued so I could appeal to POPLA. I never received the paperwork from the court, I had to contact the courts directly to query the CCJ, again I have an email thread showing this. 

 

I have never disputed the amount that is owed as I did park for 12 minutes without a ticket, this was at 4am and I thought the carpark was owned by Manchester City Council who provide free parking between 8pm and 8am - I was wrong. 

 

What information would I need to provide to the courts to have the CCJ set aside based on the fact that I did not receive the original paperwork. 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, if you disagree with my assessment: are you applying for

a) a mandatory set-aside under CPR 13.2, or

b) a discretionary set-aside under CPR 13.3?


if a) which of the reasons for a mandatory set aside apply?

if b), how are you going to persuade the court it is

i) reasonable, and

 ii) ‘prompt’, given it has been years, and you’ve already paid it off (when, if you really felt it should have been opposed you should have made the application then, instead of paying it off)

 

The courts don’t like endless litigation / re-litigation, and you had the option to seek a set-aside before instead of (not seeking the set-aside and paying it off).

 

Your opportunity to say “should be set aside and the case heard” (and / or to seek a set-aside by consent, and a Tomlin order to avoid a CCJ)  was back when you first found out about the CCJ.

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Where can I find the information for points a & b? 

I do appreciate the help but I find you throwing points around with little information as to what CPR 13.2 & CPR 13.3 very unhelpful. 

 

I did not know I had the option to set a CCJ aside until recently when I was looking into something else and I found this information on the direct gov website which is why I paid the balance of £197 to parking eye in June 2022 and only now I am querying the possibility to have it set aside

 

Information regarding CCJs is limited online unless I want to pay a solicitors to have it removed for me which is why I have come on here to seek some advice. I would also like to point out that in no way did I "disagree with your assessment" I am unsure as to where you picked that up from,  I followed on from your message with information I had read online that you hadn't included in your original reply, this was not a disagreement it was me asking a further question based on other information. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

since the initial issuance of the speculative invoice (it is NOT A FINE) have you moved or was the car registered at a different address than what was on the V5C for that time.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

since the initial issuance of the speculative invoice (it is NOT A FINE) have you moved or was the car registered at a different address than what was on the V5C for that time.

 

 

The car was registered to my address, at the time I was unofficially living at my boyfriends due a relationship breakdown in the home.

I know not being able to provide any evidence for this will not help as the court paper work could have arrived at my home address eaa but I never received it. 

45 minutes ago, Andyorch said:

Thank you for this, I will have a read over it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the fault of you not getting paperwork was because it went to an address you were not then at??. Not the claimant nor the court are at fault then??

 

be very care here. If the above is true then that doesn't meet one of the important set aside reasons.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the claimant have since sent letters with information I have requested that were never originally sent, I know this as they do not match the information sent via emails at the same time so my trust with the claimant (parking eye) is on a very thin thread. 

 

I never received the paperwork sent from the courts, this could have been sent and I just never received it. 

 

If i cannot have it set aside then it's not a huge issue, I do not plan on taking anything out on credit for a while as I am saving for a house deposit so this just gives me a longer period of time to save until it drops off. 

 

All the information online is confusing which is why I came here in the hope someone would know what they were talking about and "dumb it down" for me 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pixie2017 said:

I do appreciate the help but I find you throwing points around with little information as to what CPR 13.2 & CPR 13.3 very unhelpful. 

 

. I would also like to point out that in no way did I "disagree with your assessment" I am unsure as to where you picked that up from,  I followed on from your message with information I had read online that you hadn't included in your original reply, this was not a disagreement it was me asking a further question based on other information

 


Well, I’ve said why I think it is a non-starter.

You then reply asking what info you need to give the court….. so that suggests you don’t think it is a non-starter…..

 

Since you weren’t (& apparently still aren’t) accepting my assessment by continuing to ask what you need in your application:

I assumed you were making that decision knowing what you were doing, hence me mentioning CPR 13.

I didn’t know that you didn’t even appreciate the “mandatory” and “discretionary” grounds (even though I mentioned them in my first post…)

 

Sorry that I am “unhelpful”

https://lmgtfy.app/?q=cpr+13+set+aside
is that any better?

(It is a self help site. You could have asked me to explain, but you chose to just carry on asking without giving any indication of why you needed clarification of my assessment …..). Nor (apparently) did you Google CPR 13 

 

If they had sent the papers to an incorrect address they knew was wrong you would (on becoming aware of the CCJ) have a good chance of a set-aside at/close to that time.

 

Even if they had sent it knowingly to an incorrect address, to pay it off and then, years later decide you want a set-aside: not going to happen.

To say “I’ve only just found out about set-asides” is unlikely to fly. You could (and should?) have taken advice at the time, and I still believe your chances of a set-aside, years later, having paid it, are minimal to non-existent.

 

If they sent it to “last known address” and it is your fault, not the court or claimant’s fault: even more reason it is a hopeless case.

 

So, sorry if you think I’m unhelpful.

I have to decide who I can help and who is beyond that …. So (having given my reasons!)

I’m out.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a settled ccj is not too bad. Its not good granted but its a lot better than a bucket full of defaults.

 

just also remember that a default judgement now trumps any 'paperwork wriggles' that might have been useful had you defended .

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...