Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

G24 ANPR PCN - Matalan, Heathcote Rd, Longton, Stoke-on-Trent ST3 2NU ***Cancelled after MP intervention***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 767 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just received a parking notice from these utter villains. I've been going to this Matalan since I was about 17 and never had an issue. Now I've been given a parking charge notice. 

 

I've been going this place for years without incident. At some point during the pandemic, ANPRs went up. I assume it's recent because I actually went tail end of last year.

 

I spent over £100 in store, was parked for 19 mins, received the parking charge notice today. 

 

I've spoken to Matalan who claim they have no authority to reverse the charge. I've threatened to take all the stuff back, which I might do anyway out of principal.

 

The notice has photographic evidence. I've not appealed. I phoned the company and had a row with them but they just said appeal. 

 

Please advise :(

 

What is the current approach here?

 

I've just threatened to take all the stuff back and Matalan are adamant that they can't reverse it and it's up to the company.

 

Help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Date of the infringement 9th July
 

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 14th July

 

3 Date received 16th July.
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up No
 

7 Who is the parking company? G24

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Matalan in Longton, Stoke.


 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Waiting for missus send me a scan.

 

Attached PDF.

 

 

Appeals body is IAS.

convert-jpg-to-pdf.net_2021-07-16_13-24-09.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to G24 ANPR PCN - Matalan, Heathcote Rd, Longton, Stoke-on-Trent ST3 2NU
  • 2 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
2 minutes ago, FTMDave said:

Not very confident, are they?  No news is good news.

 

They have sent a Letter Before Action to two of "the six of you", been told to get lost and do their worst, and so far haven't had the gonads to take anyone to court.

 

BTW, did you get on to Matalan's CEO?

I did. Ignored.

 

Shock horror.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The woman who I did speak to at Matalan said it was owned by Sports Direct. I'm quite keen at this point for them to come at me and fight back. These greasy charlatans get away with it because people don't fight back.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

OK. We have a letter.

 

From Trace debt recovery: Your case has been passed to TRACE Debt Recovery UK Limited because you have an outstanding matter with our client G24 Limited and are demanding payment within 14 days from date of letter (30Nov). Total Payment Due £160.

 

There is a Note at the bottom of the page, "it is too late to appeal the original parking ticket".

 

Any suggestions for my next move?

Edited by OkYeah
Link to post
Share on other sites

What's unicorn food tax 🤣?

 

We were planning to reply with the evidence by princess roxy regarding no planning permission + the original receipt from our visit and demand no further contact. Is this futile? I'm guessing so.

 

I'm sure I read that others in this situation have placed a price on receipt of each letter, i.e. "for every letter received, there will be a charge of £1" or some nonsense. No idea if that works, probably not :D

 

These are utter clowns though. I wont' be paying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So it looks like they're still chasing us. I'm in hospital and my partner has received a letter at home and is naturally fretting. She has phoned them up, explained we have a receipt and has been told to fill in a form which she's now doing online. I have no idea if this is going to put us at a disadvantage or not but as I'm not there, I can't stop it unfortunately :( I was quite happy to keep ignoring.

 

Here's the letter anyway:

N0gzk3M_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&

Link to post
Share on other sites

*head in my hands*

 

And no surprise, they've come back this morning and rejected the appeal, so I guess that's the form they made her fill in while I wasn't here. Shock of the century. My missus has gone fully off her block on this one, has just phoned them up again ranting and raving. They've told her to send a letter to somewhere, no email, or phone number. Only a letter is allowed. 

 

I've told her to bloody calm down and wait until I've posted on here to get some sensible guidance.

 

Can we still play the ignorance game now, I.e. Ignoring the letters? I believe she provided a screenshot of the receipt we got from Matalan so they know full well we've acknowledged their letters and are were the drivers of the vehicle.

 

Remember people, don't go to bloody hospital. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The form is a submission page so I don't have a copy of the specific details that was entered.

 

She has told me that she said 'what happened' and stated she wasn't the driver, simply the registered keeper of the car, which is correct, I was driving. We're not married, don't know if that makes it easier or not. It would appear the page alone is purely about acquiring information and not about giving anyone with a fair appeal the chance to resolve this. Shock.

 

She has emailed Jack Brereton this morning, explaining the situation and asking if he can help. 


Unfortunately, her reaction is exactly what the scam artists wanted. Partner in hospital (me), she at home with a newborn child and feeling vulnerable and intimidated and scared of people knocking on the door. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

No letter of claim if if if one ever comes.

 

1 of 7 here i think. 2 did get one..norhing since

read that thread i pointed too earlier

send her its link.

 

Dx

Will do. I think she just panicked while I was away. Forgivable. Mistakes do happen. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Some cracking news. 

 

MP Jack Brereton forwarded our details to Jonathan Gullis who happens to be our local MP. He got in contact with G24 who have agreed as a goodwill gesture (behave) to write this off as there are extenuating circumstances. What? You mean because we actually used the car park as a legitimate customer? Pfft.

 

Anyway great bit of news and two MPs actually serving their local community. Refreshing change from donkeys years of absolutely nothing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • FTMDave changed the title to G24 ANPR PCN - Matalan, Heathcote Rd, Longton, Stoke-on-Trent ST3 2NU ***Cancelled after MP intervention***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...