Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
    • good you are getting there. Lloyds/TSb...i certainly would not be risking possible off-setting going on if a choice were there, but in all honestly thats obv too late now..., however..you might not never be in that situation so dont worry too much. regardless to being defaulted or not, if any debt that is not paid/used in 6yrs it becomes statute barred. you need to understand a couple of things like 'default' and 'default notice' a default is simply a recorded D in the calendar section/history of a debt, it does not really mean anything. might slightly hit your rating. the important thing here is a default notice , these are issued by the original creditor (OC) under the consumer credit act, it gives you 14 days to settle whatever they are asking, if you don't then they have the option to register a defaulted date on your credit file. that can make getting other credit more difficult. and hits your rating. once that happens, not matter what you do after that, paying it or not or not paid off or not, the whole account vanishes from your credit file on the DN's 6th b'day. though that might not necessarily mean the debt is not still owed - thats down to the SB date above. an OC very rarely does court and only the OWNER of a debt can instigate any court action (Attempted a CCJ) DCA's debt collection agencies - DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's TYPE. an OC make pass a debt to a dca as their client to try and spoof people into paying through legal ignorance of the above statement. an OC may SELL on an old debt to a DCA/debt buyer (approx 10p=£1) and then claim their losses through tax write off and their business insurance, wiping their hands of the debt. the DCA then becomes the debt OWNER. since the late 70's dca's pull all kinds of 'stunts' through threat-o-grams to spoof a debtor into paying them the full value of the debt, when they bought if for a discounted sum (typically 10p=£1). you never pay a dca a penny! if read carefully, NONE of their letters nor those of any other 'trading names' they spoof themselves under making it seem it's going up some kind of legitimate legal 'chain' say WILL anything....just carefully worded letters with all kinds of threats of what could/might/poss happen with other such words as instruct forward pass... well my dog does not sit when instructed too...so... DCA's SOMETIMES will issue a court claim, but in all honesty its simply a speculative claim hoping mugs wet themselves and cough up...oh im going to court... BIG DEAL DCA - show me the enforceable paperwork signed by me...9/10 they dont have it and if your defence is conducted properly, most run away from you . however before they do all that they now have to send a letter of claim, cause the courts got fed up with them issuing +750'000PA speculative claims and jamming up the legal system. so bottom line is two conclusions.... if you cant pay a debt, get a DN issued ASAP (stop paying it!) make sure it gets registered on your file then it stops hurting your file/future credit in 6yrs regardless to what happens (bar of course a later DCA CCJ - fat chance mind!)  once you've a registered DN , then look into restarting payments if the debt is still owed by the OC, if SOLD to a DCA, don't pay - see if they issue a letter of claim (then comeback here!).        
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Certegy Charges - Help !!


Mr_White
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6047 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone - what a fantastic website !!

 

I wonder if anyone could advise me on the following?

 

My girlfriend recently had a cheque dishonoured by her bank RBS and has been contacted by Certegy who I believe are part of the Transak cheque guaranteeing group/system. They are demanding a 'fee' of £45 for the bounced cheque and threatening court action unless paid.

 

Could anyone advise me if this is an unlawful penalty charge and point me to a standard letter telling them where to stick their charge?

 

Thanks in anticipation

 

Mr_White

RBS - £1640 refunded

MBNA - £60 refunded

Barclaycard - Still awaiting statements requested 17/1/07

Lloyds TSB - DPA sent 10/4/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to Certegy asking for a copy of the contract between them and your g/f stating that they can demand £45. If they have such a contract, then

ask them to quantify the costs involved since £45 would appear more

than their liquidated expenses and thus unenforceable in Law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a similar problem with certegy a year ago for the same reason, every letter I received from them i wrote back charging them double the fee they were trying to charge me, I also put a list of my extortionate charges on the bottom of every letter I sent them.( I do not think my charges were very lawfull )

In the end they owed me more than I owed them, actually about ten times more with my regime of fees.

Never heard from them again after about five letters.

IT IS MINE !!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for that I'll let you know how it goes.

 

Cheers

RBS - £1640 refunded

MBNA - £60 refunded

Barclaycard - Still awaiting statements requested 17/1/07

Lloyds TSB - DPA sent 10/4/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Mr White, sorry but I've just found your thread.

 

I received a letter from Certegy demanding £78.50. Needless to say, it was an unlawful penalty charge. I wrote to them informing them of this and they agreed to drop all charges as a gesture of goodwill.

 

Please read my thread here. You will find an example of a letter to send to them.

 

I hope you haven't paid it yet, if so you should be able to claim it back.

Don't let the fatherless chillen get ya! :grin:

 

Barclays - settled in full £4799.38 ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On reflection, I realise that businesses, unlike individuals, are charged by

their bank when a cheque is returned unpaid. Part of what Certegy may be

trying to reclaim is that cost, plus admin, stamps and stationery.

However, first they have to prove a contract exists between them and the customer of the retailer that Transax have an agreement with. Until they

have much more visible notices explaining their role and the conditions under

which they are working [and expect us to accept] their chances are minimal

in Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mr G,

 

I wrote back telling I would'nt be paying as I believed no contract existed and charges where unlawful blah blah and that was the last I heard.

 

Don't expect to hear anything now - Ha !!

 

Cheers

RBS - £1640 refunded

MBNA - £60 refunded

Barclaycard - Still awaiting statements requested 17/1/07

Lloyds TSB - DPA sent 10/4/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi, I'm new on the forum and am a director of my own limited company.

 

Certegy have just refused to guarantee a company cheque I was going to write at Currys. They checked before the cheque was written, so no cheque was written or handed over and I paid for the goods using a personal debit card.

 

They wouldn't tell me, but I believe the problem is that my Company's registered address (i.e. the one with Companies House in England) is different to my personal address (currently in Scotland) where the bank sends the statements.

 

I was asked for the Company Address and gave the registered address. Maybe they check against the latter. Because I work away from the registered address (always on client sites), there is no land line against the company- the company phone number is my mobile.

 

Should I be worried? Should I write and ask them for details of why the cheque was refused and face a long line of correspondence to explain the situation?

 

On the one hand I'm worried that if I do nothing, this will have an adverse affect on my company's credit rating, but on the other I don't want to provoke them into sending out fee charges willy-nilly. They sound like a dodgy bunch of bully boys - and for a company with such power, it seems very odd that they don't appear to have a website. I don't want to deal with them if unnecessary - what do you guys think?

 

Thanks in advance for any advice- much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paddy, I do not know the criteria that Certegy uses before "underwriting" a cheque, nor whether they are more stringent with Company cheques than

personal ones.

However as you would presumably be the only person to present a cheque

for payment requiring a guarantee, their refusal in this instance would not

damage your reputation in the eyes of anyone else.

Your suggestion as to the reason for refusal may well be correct, but it may be an idea to look at your credit files from the three Credit Reference Agencies in case something has appeared on them that was the reason for the refusal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone can anyone help me with my problem? I wrote a cheque at a high street store for £76, it was under my gurantee of £100 so according to you all it shouldnt have even been refferred to transax. Any how there were no signs indicating my contract with transax or leaflets to be handed out, and I am sure of this point because I actually work in this shop!!!!

The cheque was paid when presented second time and I paid my bank charges so why should I pay transax too?

I received a letter saying I had to pay £48, then another saying I had ignored all their previous attempts to resolve the matter(one letter!) then another saying I would be reffered to external debt collecting agency, and now a simple card posted thru my door saying that a d. foster will be visiting me on Tuesday(no date or month) between 9am and 9 pm and a number for me to ring if this not convenient??

 

THEY ARE DOING MY HEAD IN HELP!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gizmo, you should really start your own thread.

Why was the cheque returned unpaid the first time if it was drawn in

accordance with cheque card regulations?

And if it did comply, you should not have had to pay the returned cheque charges since the cheque was under guarantee that it would be paid. Obviously, you would still be liable for the charges for going overdrawn, if that was the reason for the return.

The reason Certegy are chasing you, is that their client would have had to

pay charges imposed by his bank for your returned cheque-companies get

charged for their customers unpaid cheques even though the return was not their fault.

As you say, you have no contract with Certegy so they should not pursue you. And if anyone should be paying Certegy, it should be your bank for not

paying a guaranteed cheque.

Write to Certegy making it quite clear that you have no contract with them,

and you will vigorously defend yourself should they take you to Court and point out

that the cheque should have been paid as it was guaranteed. If they want to

they can try and reclaim their money from your bank as they were the ones who didn't honour their own guarantee.

As for the threat to send someone round-include this with your letter-

Please note that I am only prepared to communicate with you in writing. Should it be your intention as you have warned to arrange a “doorstep call”, please remember that there is only an implied license under English Common Law for certain people to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.).

 

Please therefore take note that, I revoke license under English Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so without my permission, you will then be liable to damages for a tort of trespass. You would also be conspiring in a trespass if you sent someone from a doorstop collection service company to visit me and should it be necessary, I will seek an injunction.'

 

Hopefully they will then give up.

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gizmo, If you, or anyone else for that matter, go back to my thread here, you will find a letter I wrote to Certegy, which had the desired effect. In particular, if the charge was unlawful, then to sell that debt to a debt collection agency, surely must also be unlawful and the DCA must be very stupid to buy debts obtained in this way. I would also take heed of lookinforinfo's advice concerning door visits.

 

I had a little trouble finding this thread, it would have been better to have started your own to make it easier for people to find you and give advice rather than hijacking someone else's thread.

 

Hope this helps.

Don't let the fatherless chillen get ya! :grin:

 

Barclays - settled in full £4799.38 ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...