Jump to content


Nolans/Cabot/Lloyds CC- SPC


Recommended Posts

Have returned from abroad today and got this in the mail recorded delivery from Nolans. 
this was in response to my incidental orders application on 5th October.

they tried to upload this along with their own incidental orders form, rejecting mines, to civil online but the documents were rejected as the clerk said they were not filled in correctly. 
the Sheriff then issued the orders above on 21st October. 

Sat, 23 Oct 2021, 11:26 4.pdf Sat, 23 Oct 2021, 11:26 5.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

missing pages

put everything in one mass pdf

use pdfmerge and pdfreducer websites...read our upload guide carefully

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew nolan s were useless but thats just plain stupidity.

 

Dx

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are Nolans correct in what they are saying on their Response about no DN required? 

Just reading upon requirements for a DN ....

Requirement for a default notice

Section 87 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 necessitates service of a default notice on a debtor or hirer before a creditor or owner may become entitled by reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement to do any of the following:

  • Terminate the agreement;
  • Demand earlier payment of any sum;
  • Recover possession of any goods or land;
  • Treat any right conferred on the debtor or hirer by the agreement as terminated, restricted or deferred; or
  • Enforce any security.
Link to post
Share on other sites

nicked from andyorch sometime:

 

Default notices, litigation and section 127(3) of the Consumer Credit Act July 2010
.
 For a creditor to enforce a credit agreement against the debtor, 
he must serve the latter with a default notice, 
this notice must be served in accordance with section 88 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA).
.
 Generally, the prescribed form of a default notice according section 88 is as follows:
.
 "The default notice must be in the prescribed form and specify
.
 (a) the nature of the alleged breach;
 (b) if the breach is capable of remedy, what action is required to remedy it 
      and the date before which that action is to be taken;
 (c) if the breach is not capable of remedy, the sum (if any) required to be paid as compensation for the breach, 
     and the date before which it is to be paid."
.
 Section 127(3) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974
.
 Should the debtor be sued for the outstanding amount, 
it may be open to the debtor to raise an argument that the agreement is unenforceable 
because it does not comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations.
.
 Agreements executed before 6 April 2007 are subject to sections 127 (3) & (4) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'). 
Agreements entered into after that date are not by operation of the repeal under the Consumer Credit Act 2006.
.
 The effect of sections 127 (3) & (4) truly displays the paternalistic nature of the CCA, in that where a breach of a prescribed term under regulation 6 and schedule 6 to the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 is found, the agreement as a whole will be irredeemably unenforceable.
.
 In other words, the lender cannot enforce the agreement or realise any surety under that agreement; the debt in effect is written off.

 Regards

 Andy
.................

 

im not firing on all cylinders and wont be till well into the new year but from my notes i believe you might find this thread worthy..

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx. Shall I just file another IOA requesting to dismiss,  C2 enter....
The claimant is misleading the Sheriff. There is no such legislation in the annotated version of section 87 of the CCA1974 with regards to requesting arrears or instalments, without the need of service of a default notice. The Claimant must prove and evidence that a default notice was issued to enable the creditor/owner to proceed any litigation to enforce the agreement.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

could do .

 

cant hurt you.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...